User talk:Ekucha belrima: Difference between revisions

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keshav Tyohar (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keshav Tyohar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Keshav Tyohar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Ekucha belrima! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Hello. Your recent edit to Delhi Public School, Patna appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. LiberatorG (talk) 19:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Keshav Tyohar

Hello, Ekucha belrima. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Keshav Tyohar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 19:53, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Keshav Tyohar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Keshav Tyohar was changed by Ekucha belrima (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862141 on 2020-07-02T07:14:35+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Single focussed editing

Hi there, I can't help but notice that you seem to be entirely focussed on Keshav Tyohar[1][2][3][4][5][6]. To other members of the community, such as myself, this tends to look like you're here to do promotion. Also, if you happen to know this person, you probably have a conflict of interest and you are strongly discouraged from editing articles related to this person. This would be a significant ethical concern, as people who have conflicts of interest have difficulty writing objectively about the subject. You should also declare any conflict that you might have, both on your user page, as well as on the talk pages you intend to edit. If the problematic behaviour continues, you are likely to have your editing privileges interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sadak 2; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)