User talk:Srobodao84: Difference between revisions

AfC notification: Draft:Body image disturbance has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Body image disturbance. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Body image disturbance has been accepted

Body image disturbance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 23:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Body dissatisfaction

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Body dissatisfaction has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://nedc.com.au/eating-disorders/eating-disorders-explained/body-image/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 12:51, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

I also found some copyright text in Body dysmorphic disorder. Please don't add copyright content to Wikipedia.— Diannaa (talk) 12:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

I don't think you can find copyrighted text on the body dysmorphic disorder page. Not added by me anyway. For the article quoted, I used the sentence structure, but I would have improved the text and collaborated with others. Therefore, I would ask you to get that text back in the draft to make the necessary changes.@Diannaa Srobodao84 (talk) 13:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

I removed the DSM-5 criteria, which is copyright. Additionally, the publishers have specifically asked us not to copy DSM criteria to Wikipedia. So no, I will not be restoring it.— Diannaa (talk) 13:06, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

A diagnostic criteria is not copyrighted by law. OMG .... no doubt ... this point of view is completely nonsense. @Diannaa Srobodao84 (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

it's a fact! It correctly cited....its a quote....OMG....really nonsense policy Srobodao84 (talk) 13:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

The publishers of the DSM have specifically asked us to never publish their criteria, not even when framed as a quotation. We are not even allowed to publish lists of DSN codes. Sorry,— Diannaa (talk) 13:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

The Wikimedia Foundation received a complaint from the publisher about widespread copying in 2010 – see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 March 9#DSM Complaint (Ticket:2010030910040817). This was even referred to our legal advisor. All DSM content was removed at that time and we are definitely not allowed to add it. — Diannaa (talk) 13:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

thank you for ur clarification. Is it possible to describe the diagnostic criteria, perhaps verbalizing them in another way? @Diannaa Srobodao84 (talk) 14:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Body dissatisfaction moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Body dissatisfaction, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, medical, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kleuske (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

thank you@Kleuske Srobodao84 (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Body dissatisfaction, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Riteboke (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)