[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:65HCA7: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Prawny007 (talk | contribs)
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Prawny007 - "→‎Chelsea: "
Line 36: Line 36:
{{yo|Prawny007|prefix=}} I was trying to take care of the vandalism spree too (which has now ended), but your edit reinstated a fairly obvious test/vandalism, which I reverted, thus making your edit nonconstructive, hence my v2 warning on your talk page. I appreciate your other edits to that page, which were indeed partial or full vandal reverts, but this edit was indeed nonconstructive; if this was just a mistake, please let me know. [[User:65HCA7|<span style="color:#0000FF;">65</span>]][[User talk:65HCA7|<span style="color:#FF0000;">HC</span>]][[Special:Contributions/65HCA7|<span style="color:#00FF00;">A7</span>]] 14:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
{{yo|Prawny007|prefix=}} I was trying to take care of the vandalism spree too (which has now ended), but your edit reinstated a fairly obvious test/vandalism, which I reverted, thus making your edit nonconstructive, hence my v2 warning on your talk page. I appreciate your other edits to that page, which were indeed partial or full vandal reverts, but this edit was indeed nonconstructive; if this was just a mistake, please let me know. [[User:65HCA7|<span style="color:#0000FF;">65</span>]][[User talk:65HCA7|<span style="color:#FF0000;">HC</span>]][[Special:Contributions/65HCA7|<span style="color:#00FF00;">A7</span>]] 14:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)


Yes, I reverted an edit which was in turn another revert of a unproductive addition to the page. This was indeed a mistake and I'm glad it was corrected. Thank you
Yes, I reverted an edit which was in turn another revert of a unproductive addition to the page. This was indeed a mistake and I'm glad it was corrected. Thank you <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Prawny007|Prawny007]] ([[User talk:Prawny007#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Prawny007|contribs]]) 14:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 14:23, 31 August 2017

Archives

2015

2016

Whoops!

Hi YITYNR. Thanks for reverting my accidental rollback on Organ (anatomy). I clicked "rollback" accidentally while scrolling through my watchlist and you beat me to fixing the error. I appreciate it, and sorry for making extra work for you! Ry's the Guy (talk|contribs) 21:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rystheguy: No worries - everyone makes mistakes sometimes! I've done it too; it's kind of embarrassing. :D
Have a great day! YITYNR My workWhat's wrong? 21:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you too! Ry's the Guy (talk|contribs) 21:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

File:New Zealand TW-17.svg Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC) [reply]
Cullen328: You're welcome, and I'm confident you'll make a great administrator :) 65HCA7 11:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Cullen328

I easily fully accept that you did not perceive "mafia-like..., fully inappropriate" verbiage at all. I do not even assume this were intended by Cullen328, but I perceived the verbiage this way, especially the advice to "take care", and Cullen328 did not comment any further to his reply, which I still consider to be remarkably beyond of saying "I'm good with that". In spite of opposing to all the PC-derived crap of urbanity, civility, safety of spaces, I still try to adhere to a higher level of sensitivity, more fully de rigeur, than you seem to expect from an admin to be. Purgy (talk) 10:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Purgy Purgatorio: But it's obvious that the sentiment was "I'm okay with your vote, and I hope people don't give you crap for it." It is fully appropriate for people to say that, even the second half of it, considering people can gang up on each other around here and Vertium, the guy who voted neutral, himself expressed discomfort with said ganging-up. Your vote comes across, as K6ka said, as an oppose vote for being civil. And I don't know where you're from or what it means to you, but where I'm from "take care" is a polite thing to say, along the lines of "Okay, have a good one!"
Either way, I fail to see how Cullen's comment was the least bit inappropriate, uncivil, or offensive. 65HCA7 11:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea

Hey mate, I'm just trying to keep the vandals off the page Davide Zappacosta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prawny007 (talkcontribs) 14:09, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prawny007: I was trying to take care of the vandalism spree too (which has now ended), but your edit reinstated a fairly obvious test/vandalism, which I reverted, thus making your edit nonconstructive, hence my v2 warning on your talk page. I appreciate your other edits to that page, which were indeed partial or full vandal reverts, but this edit was indeed nonconstructive; if this was just a mistake, please let me know. 65HCA7 14:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I reverted an edit which was in turn another revert of a unproductive addition to the page. This was indeed a mistake and I'm glad it was corrected. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prawny007 (talkcontribs) 14:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]