[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:94.168.204.89: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Caution: Defamation not specifically directed on ReCAPTCHA. (TW)
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Libel|defamatory]] content to Wikipedia, as you did to [[:ReCAPTCHA]], especially if it involves [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|living persons]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-defamatory2 --> [[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal|talk]]) 18:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Libel|defamatory]] content to Wikipedia, as you did to [[:ReCAPTCHA]], especially if it involves [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|living persons]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-defamatory2 --> [[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal|talk]]) 18:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
:''If this is a [[closed proxy|shared IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->
:''If this is a [[closed proxy|shared IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->

{{uw-3RR}}[[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö|talk]]) 19:31, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:31, 9 October 2011

October 2011

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to ReCAPTCHA, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 18:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Sjö (talk) 19:31, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]