Editing User talk:34pin6
Appearance
This is a talk page. Please respect the talk page guidelines. |
Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unblock reviewed|1=In response to, Thanks for doing the necessary work with Gnosis. The "Wikipedia Writing" page you found really scared me. I will keep my eye out for these sorts of editors/articles in the future. To know that Wikipedia now has PR firms explicitly and openly trying to subvert WP's goals (for cash, no less!) is galling, but i guess not really that surprising. Thanks for the help!)<br /><br /> :Wow! I had no idea I'd butted up against such an individual. Did you read some of the rants? A lot of anger there. Can't wait for his/her next for-profit foray into this world he/she hates so much. The Signpost should do an article on this outfit. Scary. [[User:Theinterior|The Interior]] )<br /><br /> ::"the pansy version of the SS or Gestapo of WWII" Woo hoo! <br /><br /> What are you talking about? I am not a paid editor, nor do I have any connection to SM Kovalinsky. I happen to admire the firm for its charitable work and simply thought they should have any entry. You people have got to be the most presumptuous bunch I've ever seen. And the funny thing is, the more people attack you, the more fundamentalist and legalistic you become. I just can't understand the world you folks live in. I really can't. <br /><br /> Just because the firm does Wikipedia writing, doesn't mean they are not notable!! You people don't even follow your OWN rules! Where in the notability requirements does it say that a firm is disqualified from an article because they provide a service we don't like? Just so you know, their firm showed me how to edit wiki articles free of charge. So, I figured it would be nice to write one on them. From that, you all go way over to the other side of presumption, like you can read people's minds or something. I don't get. <br /><br /> What happened to assume good faith?|decline=First of all, please do not blame [[WP:NOTTHEM|other editors]] in your unblock request. It won't do anything to help your case. Secondly, you're at least two other people, one of whom has been blocked as a suspected sockpuppet of Smkovalinsky. [[User:Tnxman307|< |
{{unblock reviewed|1=In response to, Thanks for doing the necessary work with Gnosis. The "Wikipedia Writing" page you found really scared me. I will keep my eye out for these sorts of editors/articles in the future. To know that Wikipedia now has PR firms explicitly and openly trying to subvert WP's goals (for cash, no less!) is galling, but i guess not really that surprising. Thanks for the help!)<br /><br /> :Wow! I had no idea I'd butted up against such an individual. Did you read some of the rants? A lot of anger there. Can't wait for his/her next for-profit foray into this world he/she hates so much. The Signpost should do an article on this outfit. Scary. [[User:Theinterior|The Interior]] )<br /><br /> ::"the pansy version of the SS or Gestapo of WWII" Woo hoo! <br /><br /> What are you talking about? I am not a paid editor, nor do I have any connection to SM Kovalinsky. I happen to admire the firm for its charitable work and simply thought they should have any entry. You people have got to be the most presumptuous bunch I've ever seen. And the funny thing is, the more people attack you, the more fundamentalist and legalistic you become. I just can't understand the world you folks live in. I really can't. <br /><br /> Just because the firm does Wikipedia writing, doesn't mean they are not notable!! You people don't even follow your OWN rules! Where in the notability requirements does it say that a firm is disqualified from an article because they provide a service we don't like? Just so you know, their firm showed me how to edit wiki articles free of charge. So, I figured it would be nice to write one on them. From that, you all go way over to the other side of presumption, like you can read people's minds or something. I don't get. <br /><br /> What happened to assume good faith?|decline=First of all, please do not blame [[WP:NOTTHEM|other editors]] in your unblock request. It won't do anything to help your case. Secondly, you're at least two other people, one of whom has been blocked as a suspected sockpuppet of Smkovalinsky. <font color="darkorange">[[User:Tnxman307|TN]]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>[[User talk:Tnxman307|X]]</big></font></b><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Tnxman307|Man]]</font> 00:11, 14 September 2010 (UTC)}} |
||
Your claim of having no connection to Gnosis Arts is not credible. On their website they brag that they created the Wikipedia article on {{la|AA Auto Protection}}.[http://www.webcitation.org/5simXouKK] This account created that article. There are other indicators that this is the same editor as banned user {{user|Petrosianii}}, but those are best kept confidential. <b>[[User:Will Beback|<span style="color:#595454;">Will Beback</span>]] [[User talk:Will Beback|<span style="color:#C0C0C0;">talk</span>]] </b> 00:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC) |
Your claim of having no connection to Gnosis Arts is not credible. On their website they brag that they created the Wikipedia article on {{la|AA Auto Protection}}.[http://www.webcitation.org/5simXouKK] This account created that article. There are other indicators that this is the same editor as banned user {{user|Petrosianii}}, but those are best kept confidential. <b>[[User:Will Beback|<span style="color:#595454;">Will Beback</span>]] [[User talk:Will Beback|<span style="color:#C0C0C0;">talk</span>]] </b> 00:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC) |