User talk:Daveswagon: Difference between revisions

Ron Paul

How can you say with a straight face that Paul is not STRONGLY Pro-Life.

Defining LIFE to begin at conception would effectively outlaw this despicable killing nationwide.

Stop trying to make Paul into a libertarian first and a Chistian Conservative second. He is a honest man who has himself stated that these moral principle come before his views as a libertarian.

Ron Paul's Darfur policy

I question your use of the word "non-interventionist" with respect to Paul's opposition to humanitarian aid for Darfur. I also question your motives with respect to equating this opposition, which took the form of Paul working against a Darfur aid bill in Congress, with an off-the-cuff answer to a question about military action in a hypothetical war over Taiwan. Your answer to my questioning this dubious equation is simple: remove from the main article all references to Paul's actions with respect to Darfur. You apparently would prefer that the facts on this issue not appear there. Why else would you have thrown the Taiwan "issue" into the article before removing the Darfur reference entirely. You see, a pattern to your edits emerges. You don't want Paul's true record on this issue in the main article, because you know that it is unpopular. So you first misstate it, then you delete it.

And if you really believe this issue doesn't merit attention, why did you believe that the Taiwan "issue" DID? Remember, on Darfur, Paul took actions in Congress on a real, and extremely important, issue. On Taiwan, a reporter happened to ask Paul a hypothetical question on a TV show. I believe that the Taiwan thing which you added DOESN'T merit inclusion, whereas the Darfur issue does.

Adam Holland 20:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

OK, but I'm just trying to figure out why the Taiwan thing got added in the first place. Ideas???

OK. Why do I believe Paul's Darfur policy is important enough for inclusion? Precisely for the issues that were fudged by your comparison to Taiwan: 1) The issue of "non interventionism" is central to Paul's campaign. Paul's actions with respect to Darfur go to his definition of "intervention" including humanitarian aid. This broad definition is interesting to those trying to parse out "non-interventionism" as opposed to isolationism and does not appear elsewhere in the article. 2) This deals with real world acts by Paul that could have prevented aid to millions of people in Sudan, were he successful. 3) The issue of Darfur, although under the radar now, would likely arise as a major issue should Paul be nominated, and WILL likely be an issue regardless (partially because of #4). AND 4) Senator Clinton played a huge role on the bill that Paul opposed, and is the front-runner for the Democratic nomination, as you must know. So this is an instance where they have already debated, as it were.

Enough reasons for inclusion? Is the fact that I'm not neutral about Darfur a disqualification from editing on the subject? That would be a sad distortion of objectivity, and would exclude most sentient beings who know about the subject. What's happening there is terrible, not "allegedly" terrible as you would have it. How can one be indifferent to such an important issue?

Adam Holland 21:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

In response to the above, you state that Paul opposes ALL foreign aid, and ask, why should Darfur merit special attention in the main article? I think that four answers to that question are posted above. What didn't you see there that you're looking for? You are avoiding my arguments for inclusion. Maybe we should move this discussion to the talk page for the article. I feel like I'm talking to myself here.

Adam Holland 22:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Please address this issue on the talk page of the Paul article. By the way, I don't really want to debate in this forum the issue of Darfur aid, I just want Paul's opposition mentioned.

AfD nomination of Ron Paul controversies

Ron Paul controversies, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Ron Paul controversies satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Paul controversies and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Ron Paul controversies during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Coren ^(talk) 02:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Ron Paul controversies

I'm sorry, I thought Anappealtoheaven created that article. Let me think about this and see what the supporters do. BenB4 04:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Ron Paul

Oh, no problem. I appreciate that you contacted me instead of reverting again. I just wanted to organize the article. I also noticed that Wikipedia had the main page for his political views and a forked page for his views in more detail (which was basically the same for the main issues). If you want to follow the example of other candidates' pages and give a brief summary for Ron Paul's main page and then direct to the political position page I don't mind. Please just dont change the other stuff I did.

thanks,

75.37.206.111 07:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Ron Paul#Poltical positions

I'm okay with it being collapsed to a single paragraph, since there is a much longer main article. I'm kind of neutral about that; I don't think it is really too long as-is. Either way is fine with me. BenB4 20:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Automatic weapons

Please review Paul's Q&A session at Google, at time 14:40-16:00, where he was asked about machine guns, and clearly said, "automatic," not semiautomatic. ←Ben^B4 19:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that edit. What do you see when you click on automatic weapon? ←Ben^B4 23:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

The questioner asked about whether people should be allowed to own "machine guns." ←Ben^B4 23:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Current version of article lead-in

Do you have any opinion on the inclusion of "he voted against gay adoption" and other such unsupported statements in the lead of the Ron Paul article? I reverted it twice and BenB4 has accused me of campaigning rather than simply including important information and excluding unsupported statements. (I don't think any political positins should appear in those paragraphs, but if they do, I think only important ones where he has unequivocally stated what his position is and which can be supported by reliable sources should be included.)--Gloriamarie 22:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Newsletter remarks

I have started to summarize and condense the newsletter remarks section on the Ron Paul talk page. Would you mind weighing in with your thoughts. Thanks. Turtlescrubber 15:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Beijing_National_Stadium.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beijing_National_Stadium.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ArcticSun01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ArcticSun01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

List of crossings of the Upper Mississippi River

Just a quick but hearty "thanks" for correcting the format of my date. KevinWho 02:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Solucient. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Camann•TALK 16:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Solucient. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Camann•TALK 18:47, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

While you shouldn't have done it, the page looks fine as a stub now so I won't add it back. Camann•TALK 18:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bigstoryronpaul.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bigstoryronpaul.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

recent edit

I would also like to apologize for my reaction as I should have assumed you had better intentions. I have had no problems with any of your edits or comments thus far. I just had a nasty run in with another editor and the nastiness rubbed off on me. So, my apologies. Turtlescrubber 01:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Centracarehealthsystemlogo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Centracarehealthsystemlogo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Quick reminder

Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (re:St. Cloud, Minnesota)--Appraiser 18:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem; I was just surprised to see your name there. Happy editing.--Appraiser 18:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Internet censorship in the United States

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Internet censorship in the United States, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Gudeldar 00:25, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

not sure where to put this but...

lets work on adding more stuff to the tech high school page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xinpig (talk • contribs) 14:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Conflation of indoor arena and stadium in Hangzhou

Hi there. It looks like with the naming of this image and its description, Image:Hangzhou-yellow-dragon-stad.jpg, and your creation and information you put in Yellow Dragon Stadium, you conflated two different objects, and this confusion has propagated now to other articles. According to these sources: [1] and [2], there is a 2003-built indoor arena for 8,000 people called Yellow Dragon Stadium (黄龙体育中心, Address: Shuguang Rd./Huanglong Rd. 曙光路/黄龙路), as well as a 2000-built outdoor football (soccer) stadium for 60,000 people called Hangzhou Stadium (杭州市体育馆, Address: Hangzhou Stadium, Tiyuchang Road 体育场路杭州市体育馆（浙江日报社旁边), both part of a Hangzhou Dragon Sports Centre.

Your article Yellow Dragon Stadium conflates financial information and seating capacity (until someone else's recent edit of seating capacity) for both stadia and uses your image of the outdoor stadium. The FIFA.com page about the venue of the ongoing FIFA Women's World Cup 2007 in soccer [3] calls it "Hangzhou Dragon Stadium" and depicts the object you named Yellow Dragon Stadium - this is where the date 2000 appears.

Finally, the indoor arena named Yellow Dragon Stadium is pictured here on its openning day in November 2003: [4]. You used this link as a reference in Yellow Dragon Stadium for the quoted cost figure. It pictures a clearly different structure than the one whose picture you uploaded, and the description mentions its use for ice skating. Perhaps the name used here is a mistake?

Frankly, I'm not sure what the best way to fix this is, because while tracking this down I uncovered a lot of mentions of Yellow Dragon Stadium in the context of the football venue, and a dearth of mentions of the indoor venue, save for the two references quoted above. Perhaps we should create separate articles for the football stadium and the indoor arena, or at least unconflate the information in the present article and mention the indoor arena along with the outdoor stadium. Best Wishes, --Mareklug ^talk 20:32, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

P.s. I found this recent (28 July 2007) blog entry, where the author mentions Yellow Dragon Stadium and Yellow Dragon Gymnasium next door: [5]. Also, the gymnasium is marked as object no. 2 on this map of the Dragon Sports Centre made when the Centre was proposed, and in the description, the gymansium is described as seating 7,000 people and being intended among others for figure ice skating competitions: [6]. I supposed the actually built arena was made to seat 8,000. Therefore, perhaps the article for the indoor arena should be called Yellow Dragon Gymnasium? And that's where the reference link for the cost (with the picture of the indoor arena opening) should go, as well as the info about seating 8,000 people and being opened in 2003? Also, this hotel page describes the nearby "Zhejiang Provincial Yellow Dragon Gym, both a physical centre and cultural centre where art and literary activities are held.": [7]. --Mareklug ^talk 21:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Meetup RSVP

---

Minnesota Meetup

Sunday, 2007-10-07, 1:00 p.m. (13:00)
Pracna on Main
117 Main SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Map

Please pass this on! RSVP here.

---

Spam delivered by--Appraiser 15:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Finalfantasyvlogocropped.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Finalfantasyvlogocropped.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Ron Paul

Welcome back! I wondered where you had gone off to. :) Did you see that our pal Ben turned out to be a sockpuppet?--Gloriamarie 02:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

List of documentary films about the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of documentary films about the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Fayenatic (talk) 20:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

List of documentary films about Chinese topics

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of documentary films about Chinese topics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Fayenatic (talk) 21:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

New Sauk Rapids Bridge

Hi, I made a few changed to New Sauk Rapids Bridge. I added in the costs of the bridge itself ($20.46 million), and I added a paragraph on the scope of the project. Being a road construction buff, I had saved newspaper articles regarding the bridge project since it began.

In the paragraph I added, I tried paraphrasing an article from when the project was just starting that stated: The project is believed to be the first transportation-induced relocation of its scale in the nation. State and federal officials are watching. If all goes well, it may set a precedent for how major downtown transportation projects are handled.

You can fix it around if I what I've added is relevant to the article, since I'm relatively new to editing Wikipedia articles.

SpaceJunkie 02:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Versosartellmill.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Versosartellmill.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Straphaelshospitalfire.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Straphaelshospitalfire.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Unsinkable aircraft carrier

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Unsinkable aircraft carrier, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Unsinkable aircraft carrier. Mbisanz (talk) 11:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Generals three gorges dam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Generals three gorges dam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Ronpaulsignature.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Ronpaulsignature.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 18:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Foreignpolicyofpeacebook.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Foreignpolicyofpeacebook.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Schsurgery.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Schsurgery.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Lifelinkiiisch.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Lifelinkiiisch.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Farmaidmanhattan.png

An image that you uploaded, Image:Farmaidmanhattan.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. WikiWikiPhil (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Farmaidmanhattan.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Farmaidmanhattan.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VegitaU (talk) 19:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to [[::Image:Farmaidmanhattan.png]]. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Don't upload copyrighted images under free-use or public-domain tags. VegitaU (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

About the message

Hey, this IP address: 218.103.131.92 has never done anything of such, is this a mistake? I never contribute these pages!