[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:Domer48: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Domer48 (talk | contribs)
Please keep comments at an article talkpage, focused on the article, thanks
Line 89: Line 89:


There is a whole host of comments on that section, but only one that gets removed. I had to smile when I seen the edit summary "section is for logged actions, not comments." Elonka please don't accuse me of edit-warring again! --<font face="Celtic">[[User:Domer48|<span style="color:#009900"><strong>Domer48</strong></span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Domer48|<span style="color:#006600">'fenian'</span>]]''</sub></font> 17:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
There is a whole host of comments on that section, but only one that gets removed. I had to smile when I seen the edit summary "section is for logged actions, not comments." Elonka please don't accuse me of edit-warring again! --<font face="Celtic">[[User:Domer48|<span style="color:#009900"><strong>Domer48</strong></span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Domer48|<span style="color:#006600">'fenian'</span>]]''</sub></font> 17:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

==Sinn Fein==
Please refactor your comments about other editors' perceived delusions, thanks. Just keep comments at the article talkpage focused on the article. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 22:08, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:08, 6 November 2009

  • Pádraig, Rest In Peace a chara - sorely missed - not to be forgotten.


-- Trolls will be removed with Extreme prejudice!

This editor is a
Veteran Editor II
and is entitled to display this
Bronze Editor Star.
This editor is a Grand Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain.
Today is 8 September 2024


Archive
Archives
  1. Archive 1 - February 2007 to December 2007
  2. Archive 2 - Jan 2008 to December 2008
  3. Archive 3 - Jan 2009 to December 2009
  4. Archive 4


Useful Noticeboard


Template messages


Diff

[1]

Troubles Case

Domer48, edit-warring on an arbitration case page is extremely unwise.[2] This kind of behavior could lead to being placed on probation, so please don't do it again. Instead, just focus on the articles? You've been doing good work there, that's the best use of your time and attention. --Elonka 15:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it you that is edit warring Elonka? Threats of placing someone on "probation" are extremely unwise and only likely to enflame the situation further.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Completely agree VK, admin bad blocks me, and then edit wars about a clarification of the bad block. BigDunc 15:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a whole host of comments on that section, but only one that gets removed. I had to smile when I seen the edit summary "section is for logged actions, not comments." Elonka please don't accuse me of edit-warring again! --Domer48'fenian' 17:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sinn Fein

Please refactor your comments about other editors' perceived delusions, thanks. Just keep comments at the article talkpage focused on the article. --Elonka 22:08, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]