User talk:Domer48: Difference between revisions
→Troubles Case: com |
Please keep comments at an article talkpage, focused on the article, thanks |
||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
There is a whole host of comments on that section, but only one that gets removed. I had to smile when I seen the edit summary "section is for logged actions, not comments." Elonka please don't accuse me of edit-warring again! --<font face="Celtic">[[User:Domer48|<span style="color:#009900"><strong>Domer48</strong></span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Domer48|<span style="color:#006600">'fenian'</span>]]''</sub></font> 17:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC) |
There is a whole host of comments on that section, but only one that gets removed. I had to smile when I seen the edit summary "section is for logged actions, not comments." Elonka please don't accuse me of edit-warring again! --<font face="Celtic">[[User:Domer48|<span style="color:#009900"><strong>Domer48</strong></span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Domer48|<span style="color:#006600">'fenian'</span>]]''</sub></font> 17:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Sinn Fein== |
|||
Please refactor your comments about other editors' perceived delusions, thanks. Just keep comments at the article talkpage focused on the article. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 22:08, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:08, 6 November 2009
If you object to anything you read on this page, then the correct solution is to click here. Domer48 (talk) 16:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC) |
- Pádraig, Rest In Peace a chara - sorely missed - not to be forgotten.
-- Trolls will be removed with Extreme prejudice!
|
Archives |
---|
Useful links
Irish Manual of Style~
Policy ~
Assume good faith ~
Citing sources ~
Civility ~
Consensus ~
Dispute resolution ~
Etiquette ~
No original research ~
What Wikipedia is not ~
No personal attacks ~
Neutral point of view ~
POINT ~
Reliable sources ~
Verifiability ~
WP:Attribution ~
WP:Synthesis ~
tools ~
WP:Avoid peacock terms ~
Wikipedia:Avoid weasel terms
Useful Noticeboard
3RR~ WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ~ Third opinion Noticeboard ~ Wikipedia:No original research/noticeboard
Template messages
Warning templates ~ Template messages/Sources of articles ~ Template messages/Cleanup ~ Template messages/Disputes
Diff
Troubles Case
Domer48, edit-warring on an arbitration case page is extremely unwise.[2] This kind of behavior could lead to being placed on probation, so please don't do it again. Instead, just focus on the articles? You've been doing good work there, that's the best use of your time and attention. --Elonka 15:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Isn't it you that is edit warring Elonka? Threats of placing someone on "probation" are extremely unwise and only likely to enflame the situation further.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Completely agree VK, admin bad blocks me, and then edit wars about a clarification of the bad block. BigDunc 15:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
There is a whole host of comments on that section, but only one that gets removed. I had to smile when I seen the edit summary "section is for logged actions, not comments." Elonka please don't accuse me of edit-warring again! --Domer48'fenian' 17:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Sinn Fein
Please refactor your comments about other editors' perceived delusions, thanks. Just keep comments at the article talkpage focused on the article. --Elonka 22:08, 6 November 2009 (UTC)