User talk:Domer48: Difference between revisions

; Archives
	Archive 1 - February 2007 to December 2007; Archive 2 - Jan 2008 to December 2008; Archive 3 - Jan 2009 to December 2009; Archive 4;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:16, 10 November 2009

If you object to anything you read on this page, then the correct solution is to click here. Domer48 (talk) 16:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pádraig, Rest In Peace a chara - sorely missed - not to be forgotten.

-- Trolls will be removed with Extreme prejudice!

This editor is a
**Veteran Editor II**
and is entitled to display this
**Bronze Editor Star**.

This editor is a **Grand Tutnum** and is entitled to display this **Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain**.

Today is 8 September 2024

Diff

[1]

Page ban at Peter Hart

I did tell you that you would be banned from editing Peter Hart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) if you restored the coat-rack criticism and questionable sources. You did so here. You are now banned from editing the Peter Hart article for the next three months. I have of course reverted your edit. Please do not add similar questionably sourced criticism of Hart to any other article. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so! No Troubles remedy gives you the authority to ban Domer from that page, I suggest you read them. There is an ArbCom case that would give you the authority to ban someone from a page, but as you haven't followed the correct procedure required by the remedy from that case that can't apply either. That said, and without having had time to investigate the merits of the edits in question, I would advise Domer in the strongest possible terms not to add the disputed material in question or any other possibly controversial material without clear consensus on the talk page. This should forestall the need for any petty and vindictive blocks, and unless Domer says he is going to restore the material any block that is attempted is not a preventative one and therefore against policy. I would caution anyone even thinking about using tools right now to investigate recent ArbCom cases involving page bans issued without authority and use of tools to enforce them. 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 12:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I knew the Ban was BS! It will be ignored and your advice taken on board. --Domer48_'fenian' 12:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You won't be surprised to learn that you're blocked for a week. Next time it'll be a month. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:55, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Domer, I've unblocked you, because I believe that your edit was not in violation of the ban (which I do believe to be valid, per WP:BLPBAN).--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Post a link to the remedy that gives you the authority to issue a page ban. --Domer48_'fenian' 16:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 :You won't be surprised to learn that you're blocked for a week. Next time it'll be a month. [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]]  [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 15:55, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
+::Domer, I've unblocked you, because I believe that your edit was not in violation of the ban (which I do believe to be valid, per [[WP:BLPBAN]]).--[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] ([[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|talk]]) 16:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 Post a link to the remedy that gives you the authority to issue a page ban. --<font face="Celtic">[[User:Domer48|<span style="color:#009900"><strong>Domer48</strong></span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Domer48|<span style="color:#006600">'fenian'</span>]]''</sub></font> 16:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:16, 10 November 2009

Useful links

Useful Noticeboard

Template messages

Diff

Page ban at Peter Hart