User talk:Futuristicediting: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{unblock reviewed|reason=First of all few editors here revert just anything even without reading it. There is no freedom of speech here. Many articles which were needed to be moved were moved. For example Albany in New York must be written Albany, NY then why not the places in Delhi. Many of the articles which I created and I moved it were reverted, which was my right because I created it. I added references as well but some people keep on reverting the articles and blocking people. I invested my time and energy here and what I got is block. I heard many stories on the internet like mine that people were bullied here.[[User:Futuristicediting|Futuristicediting]] ([[User talk:Futuristicediting#top|talk]]) 16:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)|decline=This does not address your disruptive edits, including 85 edits to this very request, mostly one character at a time. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)}} |
{{unblock reviewed|reason=First of all few editors here revert just anything even without reading it. There is no freedom of speech here. Many articles which were needed to be moved were moved. For example Albany in New York must be written Albany, NY then why not the places in Delhi. Many of the articles which I created and I moved it were reverted, which was my right because I created it. I added references as well but some people keep on reverting the articles and blocking people. I invested my time and energy here and what I got is block. I heard many stories on the internet like mine that people were bullied here.[[User:Futuristicediting|Futuristicediting]] ([[User talk:Futuristicediting#top|talk]]) 16:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)|decline=This does not address your disruptive edits, including 85 edits to this very request, mostly one character at a time. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)}} |
||
:@[[User:Futuristicediting|Futuristicediting]], Ignoring all of your misdeeds, I had to respond to this: {{xt|which was my right because I created it}} |
|||
- You do not "own" anything here. Just because you created an article, you do not have an extra right to it. It's a collaborative project where we build and contribute to this encyclopedia, maintaining humility. [[User:Xkalponik|X]] ([[User talk:Xkalponik|talk]]) 17:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:: I offered to help you but you chose to go your own direction. My offer still stands should you be unblocked. No one is bullying you. Think of Wikipedia like a job, a volunteer job but a job nonetheless. You can not do whatever you want on a job. You have to follow procedures, policies and work instructions. You do not own anything you create on "company time". Every time you publish and edit, whether it is as an IP or User, you agree to following Wikipedia policy. This encyclopedia is owned by the WMF. Editing is a privilege that most of us take very seriously and, respective of that fact, do so in good faith as a community. We accept criticism and guidance even when it hurts our feelings. We do not claim some one is bullying or hounding or harassing us unjustifiably just because we don't like what was said or done. If you are allowed the privilege to edit again, ad I do hope you are able to one day, I should hope you will keep this in mind. --[[User:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b76e79">'''A'''</span><span style="color:#be4f60">'''Rose'''</span>]][[User talk:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b87333">'''Wolf'''</span>]] 17:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
:: I offered to help you but you chose to go your own direction. My offer still stands should you be unblocked. No one is bullying you. Think of Wikipedia like a job, a volunteer job but a job nonetheless. You can not do whatever you want on a job. You have to follow procedures, policies and work instructions. You do not own anything you create on "company time". Every time you publish and edit, whether it is as an IP or User, you agree to following Wikipedia policy. This encyclopedia is owned by the WMF. Editing is a privilege that most of us take very seriously and, respective of that fact, do so in good faith as a community. We accept criticism and guidance even when it hurts our feelings. We do not claim some one is bullying or hounding or harassing us unjustifiably just because we don't like what was said or done. If you are allowed the privilege to edit again, ad I do hope you are able to one day, I should hope you will keep this in mind. --[[User:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b76e79">'''A'''</span><span style="color:#be4f60">'''Rose'''</span>]][[User talk:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b87333">'''Wolf'''</span>]] 17:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:47, 8 April 2024
If it's free encyclopedia then why people bully others. Who gave him the right to damage the work on which someone gave his/her 100%. They don't let anyone edit anything. There is a Indigo Line Delhi Metro article about a metro line which will not be a separate metro line instead will be an extension of the Green Line. I requested the merger and I even edit the Green Line and they reverted it. Many names in hindi of the metro stations were wrong and corrected it and they revert it. This is actually not free encyclopedia instead few people don't let others participate. I even requested to close my account after getting bullied but they did nothing. Many people suffered the same. If you are talking about the User name change request then it was not happening so I thought maybe I didn't do it properly so I did it few times. If you are talking about my talk page edit, I'm sorry because I wasn't aware.
Blocked unnecessarily
Futuristicediting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all few editors here revert just anything even without reading it. There is no freedom of speech here. Many articles which were needed to be moved were moved. For example Albany in New York must be written Albany, NY then why not the places in Delhi. Many of the articles which I created and I moved it were reverted, which was my right because I created it. I added references as well but some people keep on reverting the articles and blocking people. I invested my time and energy here and what I got is block. I heard many stories on the internet like mine that people were bullied here.Futuristicediting (talk) 16:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not address your disruptive edits, including 85 edits to this very request, mostly one character at a time. 331dot (talk) 16:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I offered to help you but you chose to go your own direction. My offer still stands should you be unblocked. No one is bullying you. Think of Wikipedia like a job, a volunteer job but a job nonetheless. You can not do whatever you want on a job. You have to follow procedures, policies and work instructions. You do not own anything you create on "company time". Every time you publish and edit, whether it is as an IP or User, you agree to following Wikipedia policy. This encyclopedia is owned by the WMF. Editing is a privilege that most of us take very seriously and, respective of that fact, do so in good faith as a community. We accept criticism and guidance even when it hurts our feelings. We do not claim some one is bullying or hounding or harassing us unjustifiably just because we don't like what was said or done. If you are allowed the privilege to edit again, ad I do hope you are able to one day, I should hope you will keep this in mind. --ARoseWolf 17:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Lost hope, bye forever
Futuristicediting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was told that it's not someone's property if they created an article, it's also not a property of someone who revert someone's hard work on any article. They don't even read while reverting. I even asked to close my account after getting bullied here. But they did nothing. I joined 18 years ago and created many articles. If it's a free encyclopedia then why people are getting bullied. They give their time on something and people revert articles even there's a reference there. I heard many stories like mine. If they will not let others create articles, who will give time here? To Be honest it's like living in matrix and for sure it is. Where you don't know if you are talking to a human or an NPC. I am not saying that the articles I created are my property but it's also not the property of someone who revert people's hard work on a topic.[[User:Futuristicediting|Futuristicediting]] ([[User talk:Futuristicediting#top|talk]]) 17:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was told that it's not someone's property if they created an article, it's also not a property of someone who revert someone's hard work on any article. They don't even read while reverting. I even asked to close my account after getting bullied here. But they did nothing. I joined 18 years ago and created many articles. If it's a free encyclopedia then why people are getting bullied. They give their time on something and people revert articles even there's a reference there. I heard many stories like mine. If they will not let others create articles, who will give time here? To Be honest it's like living in matrix and for sure it is. Where you don't know if you are talking to a human or an NPC. I am not saying that the articles I created are my property but it's also not the property of someone who revert people's hard work on a topic.[[User:Futuristicediting|Futuristicediting]] ([[User talk:Futuristicediting#top|talk]]) 17:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was told that it's not someone's property if they created an article, it's also not a property of someone who revert someone's hard work on any article. They don't even read while reverting. I even asked to close my account after getting bullied here. But they did nothing. I joined 18 years ago and created many articles. If it's a free encyclopedia then why people are getting bullied. They give their time on something and people revert articles even there's a reference there. I heard many stories like mine. If they will not let others create articles, who will give time here? To Be honest it's like living in matrix and for sure it is. Where you don't know if you are talking to a human or an NPC. I am not saying that the articles I created are my property but it's also not the property of someone who revert people's hard work on a topic.[[User:Futuristicediting|Futuristicediting]] ([[User talk:Futuristicediting#top|talk]]) 17:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Futuristicediting (talk) 17:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
There's a misunderstanding
Futuristicediting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=If it's free encyclopedia then why people bully others. Who gave him the right to damage the work on which someone gave his/her 100%. They don't let anyone edit anything. There is a Indigo Line Delhi Metro article about a metro line which will not be a separate metro line instead will be an extension of the Green Line. I requested the merger and I even edit the Green Line and they reverted it. Many names in hindi of the metro stations were wrong and corrected it and they revert it. This is actually not free encyclopedia instead few people don't let others participate. I even requested to close my account after getting bullied but they did nothing. Many people suffered the same. If you are talking about the User name change request then it was not happening so I thought maybe I didn't do it properly so I did it few times. If you are talking about my talk page edit, I'm sorry because I wasn't aware. [[User:Futuristicediting|Futuristicediting]] ([[User talk:Futuristicediting#top|talk]]) 17:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=If it's free encyclopedia then why people bully others. Who gave him the right to damage the work on which someone gave his/her 100%. They don't let anyone edit anything. There is a Indigo Line Delhi Metro article about a metro line which will not be a separate metro line instead will be an extension of the Green Line. I requested the merger and I even edit the Green Line and they reverted it. Many names in hindi of the metro stations were wrong and corrected it and they revert it. This is actually not free encyclopedia instead few people don't let others participate. I even requested to close my account after getting bullied but they did nothing. Many people suffered the same. If you are talking about the User name change request then it was not happening so I thought maybe I didn't do it properly so I did it few times. If you are talking about my talk page edit, I'm sorry because I wasn't aware. [[User:Futuristicediting|Futuristicediting]] ([[User talk:Futuristicediting#top|talk]]) 17:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=If it's free encyclopedia then why people bully others. Who gave him the right to damage the work on which someone gave his/her 100%. They don't let anyone edit anything. There is a Indigo Line Delhi Metro article about a metro line which will not be a separate metro line instead will be an extension of the Green Line. I requested the merger and I even edit the Green Line and they reverted it. Many names in hindi of the metro stations were wrong and corrected it and they revert it. This is actually not free encyclopedia instead few people don't let others participate. I even requested to close my account after getting bullied but they did nothing. Many people suffered the same. If you are talking about the User name change request then it was not happening so I thought maybe I didn't do it properly so I did it few times. If you are talking about my talk page edit, I'm sorry because I wasn't aware. [[User:Futuristicediting|Futuristicediting]] ([[User talk:Futuristicediting#top|talk]]) 17:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}