User talk:Futuristicediting: Difference between revisions

If it's free encyclopedia then why people bully others. Who gave him the right to damage the work on which someone gave his/her 100%. They don't let anyone edit anything. There is a Indigo Line Delhi Metro article about a metro line which will not be a separate metro line instead will be an extension of the Green Line. I requested the merger and I even edit the Green Line and they reverted it. Many names in hindi of the metro stations were wrong and corrected it and they revert it. This is actually not free encyclopedia instead few people don't let others participate. I even requested to close my account after getting bullied but they did nothing. Many people suffered the same. If you are talking about the User name change request then it was not happening so I thought maybe I didn't do it properly so I did it few times. If you are talking about my talk page edit, I'm sorry because I wasn't aware.

Blocked unnecessarily

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Futuristicediting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

First of all few editors here revert just anything even without reading it. There is no freedom of speech here. Many articles which were needed to be moved were moved. For example Albany in New York must be written Albany, NY then why not the places in Delhi. Many of the articles which I created and I moved it were reverted, which was my right because I created it. I added references as well but some people keep on reverting the articles and blocking people. I invested my time and energy here and what I got is block. I heard many stories on the internet like mine that people were bullied here.Futuristicediting (talk) 16:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address your disruptive edits, including 85 edits to this very request, mostly one character at a time. 331dot (talk) 16:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lost hope, bye forever

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Futuristicediting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was told that it's not someone's property if they created an article, it's also not a property of someone who revert someone's hard work on any article. They don't even read while reverting. I even asked to close my account after getting bullied here. But they did nothing. I joined 18 years ago and created many articles. If it's a free encyclopedia then why people are getting bullied. They give their time on something and people revert articles even there's a reference there. I heard many stories like mine. If they will not let others create articles, who will give time here? To Be honest it's like living in matrix and for sure it is. Where you don't know if you are talking to a human or an NPC. I am not saying that the articles I created are my property but it's also not the property of someone who revert people's hard work on a topic.Futuristicediting (talk) 17:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for the block, which is clearly spelled out: disruptive editing (tons of unexplained name changes/moves, and those 85 name changes. Drmies (talk) 18:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There's a misunderstanding

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Futuristicediting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

If it's free encyclopedia then why people bully others. Who gave him the right to damage the work on which someone gave his/her 100%. They don't let anyone edit anything. There is a Indigo Line Delhi Metro article about a metro line which will not be a separate metro line instead will be an extension of the Green Line. I requested the merger and I even edit the Green Line and they reverted it. Many names in hindi of the metro stations were wrong and corrected it and they revert it. This is actually not free encyclopedia instead few people don't let others participate. I even requested to close my account after getting bullied but they did nothing. Many people suffered the same. If you are talking about the User name change request then it was not happening so I thought maybe I didn't do it properly so I did it few times. If you are talking about my talk page edit, I'm sorry because I wasn't aware. Futuristicediting (talk) 17:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This isn't an unblock request as much as it is an attempt to blame others. Drmies (talk) 18:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Don't remove declined unblock requests from this page while you are still blocked. If you continue to do so, your ability to edit this page will also be removed. stwalkerster (talk) 19:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

• You seem to think that "free encyclopedia" means that people can do whatever they want without restrictions or limitations. That's not true. 331dot (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

  No dear, I know it's not like that. I first wanted to delete my account like we always do on other sites but here I am not getting that option to completely delete my account. At least talk page, notifications and user page should be deleted. I didn't use it for 18 years and I tried to added few articles and a guy named Dhruv Edits purposely deleted my pages. Then this guy with the ID Kashmiri did the same. I always corrected the names of the places and added information about them and they said you can't add what you already know instead add a reference. I added that too, even though they deleted that. I corrected the information and they reverted. At least think like a friend. Futuristicediting (talk) 19:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

  I don't know if you believe me, but I know I'm honest. I sometimes feel innocent people face many challenges and sometimes have to prove their honesty. We met many people in our lives but only few are trustworthy. I never met someone who's loyal. Futuristicediting (talk) 20:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)