User talk:Hnedrfrieowjiahfguh: Difference between revisions

In response to your feedback

You are contributing to the education of the masses. ;) I know it can be frustrating to have your edits undone or changed, but it happens to everyone. You're doing a good job with the edits to Scientific notation and the redirect of Normalised notation, so don't get discouraged.

If you ever need anything, let me know or ask at the help desk.

Steven Walling • talk 01:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

For reverting vandalism at Feminism. I note you aren't a frequent editor and that you contributions, although small, are very much appreciated. Tutelary (talk) 02:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for the thanks. FuzzyCatPotato (talk) 02:18, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Seems like a close relative of the ceiling cat.

Kosterortiizbrock (talk) 05:55, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

Hello, FuzzyCatPotato. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Michel Chossudovsky, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. I'm not trying to be nasty about it, but that's not how we roll on this wiki. Edit warring is not allowed, and if there's a disagreement we take it to the talk page or Requests for Comment, especially when one or more parties have a conflict of interest. In the spirit of an open mind, imagine of someone from Conservapedia started linking to that website in articles. How would you feel about that? That's the problem with COI editing. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 18:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

@PCHS-NJROTC:: Already read them. Only reverted because both yourself and Fyddle failed to provide a reason for their removal. Since you're interested, you should surely FuzzyCatPotato (talk) 15:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Seriously?

This is just silly, please stop. Fyddlestix (talk) 04:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

As the name says, it's definitely not me. FuzzyCatPotato (talk) 13:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

In all honesty, the whole thing was not even vaguely amusing to start with. I'd also strongly suggest that you don't try to rally the troops into pursuing the matter. Having come up with a bad idea you, for some reason, think is good(?) ≠ it is recommended that you keep sticking beans up your nose. Thank you for using your judgement wisely henceforth... seriously. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keegscee. That was not FuzzyCatPotato. Sro23 (talk) 03:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

I will point out that the troll is from the same site as FuzzyCatPotato, though he hasn't been active there in years. To clarify, he was a respected member there in good standing, not a "wandal" as they call it. When he was community banned here, the other members there all stood by his side, saying that his ban wasn't fair, and saying derogatory things about me and other Wikipedians. This troll from his site must make FuzzyCatPotato proud of his mothership. Beyond that, congratulations to the troll for creating drama. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 12:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Vaginal steaming. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fuzzy, this has been discussed before. Don't add links to Rational-Wiki, or other places where you would have a conflict of interest without a good reason (like on the site's own article), doing so is spam. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 03:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)