User talk:JimmyHook19202122: Difference between revisions

Modifications list

I removed the modifications lists from pages 4960, 29, 18, 734, T&G 30, SPLCo 28, 1316, and 425, because a highly experienced user called Trains13 taught me that having the modifications list at all is unreliable and unencyclopedic. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 16:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

I don't care. You just wanna listen to a goody two shoes who wants the modifications page removed. >:/

IT WILL STAY! >:( JimmyHook19202122 (talk) 10:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

It will not. The list is very badly sourced and is far too detailed to be considered encyclopedic. A train's whistle being replaced really isn't that noteworthy. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 16:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

It is too. >:/ JimmyHook19202122 (talk) 21:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Is NOT, you ignorant foamer. Trains13 (talk) 00:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Listen, “Jimmy”, Wikipedia is about creating pages while keeping details at a VERY minimal amount. I have learned that the hard way. If you want to add all the modification facts about a locomotive, do it on some other websites, like Fandom, or Wordpress. PLEASE don’t add such excessive detail on a Wikipedia article and DON’T go out of the way to insult or name-call people! It’s impolite, unprofessional, uncalled for, and immature! Someone who likes train writing (talk) 01:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for standing up. Trains13 (talk) 01:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

You are an a$$hole, Jimmy! Trains13 (talk) 04:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Grand Canyon Railway 4960. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

You want a war? You got a war. >:/ JimmyHook19202122 (talk) 14:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 15:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Pah. JimmyHook19202122 (talk) 15:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Don't be a self-absorbed a-hole and listen to the Wikipedia's reasons and policies. |:( Trains13 (talk) 16:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Screw you mister goody two shoes. JimmyHook19202122 (talk) 21:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Don't be rude! There's a lot of reasons why the modifications list should be removed from the locomotive:

1. It does not have any sources added.
2. It was made to prevent an article from being removed.
3. Highlighting these nitty-gritty details is NOT how Wikipedia articles are supposed to be written.

YOU need to understand the fact that adding these unnecessary contents will not work whatsoever. Trains13 (talk) 21:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Whatever. JimmyHook19202122 (talk) 23:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Excuse me?! Trains13 (talk) 00:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)