User talk:KojiDude: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
even worse, my first thought after finding out you were a chick was "I bet she plays as Sheva". not a good reflection on me, nope, not so |
|||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
Just incase you didn't see it on the discussion page I thought I'd say it here; the Missions section to me seem completely redundent as all the information in it is/can be covered in the plot section, it also clutters up the page with lots of small bits under new headlines. [[User:Ninjalemming|'''<font color="#black">'</font><font color="#gold">The Ninja]]</font>'''''<font color="#gold">[[User talk:Ninjalemming|lemming]]</font>'''<font color="#black">'</font>''' 17:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC) |
Just incase you didn't see it on the discussion page I thought I'd say it here; the Missions section to me seem completely redundent as all the information in it is/can be covered in the plot section, it also clutters up the page with lots of small bits under new headlines. [[User:Ninjalemming|'''<font color="#black">'</font><font color="#gold">The Ninja]]</font>'''''<font color="#gold">[[User talk:Ninjalemming|lemming]]</font>'''<font color="#black">'</font>''' 17:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
:That's what I was thinking as I re-wrote it. I'd support removing it and probably would have done it myself sooner or later.--[[User:KojiDude|<font color="silver">''Koji''</font>]][[Faith|<font color="gray">†</font>]] 20:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC) |
:That's what I was thinking as I re-wrote it. I'd support removing it and probably would have done it myself sooner or later.--[[User:KojiDude|<font color="silver">''Koji''</font>]][[Faith|<font color="gray">†</font>]] 20:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Er... == |
|||
First of all, I'm not a guy, but obviously because I'm arguing about a video game that's the stereotype you come up with. Super. Secondly if you'd have READ I was responding to one person who said he ducked before the rockets went through when he clearly didn't, I even said I'm not debating it and I'm happy with where it is. I don't appreciate you coming in my talk page making accusations that I'm trying to bring it up when I even said "I'm happy with what's there now and people can come up with their own decisions". All I was doing was showing him that the rockets passed before he ducked so he could see what I meant. I also don't care if a billion people come in saying I'm wrong and he "ducked before the rockets" because it's obviously there and those who deny it for the sake of bringing Wesker back (and I mean those who want him back, not those who want not to have speculation in the article) are just grasping at straws. Also your argument that is was "resolved 14 days ago let it drop", I'm sorry, I missed it because I've not been online much. Sorry if my lack of Internet time means I can't respond to something I wanted to respond to 14 days ago. I even said I wouldn't be responding anymore because ''I know it's resolved'' and I don't see why you felt the need to barge in on my talk page and tell me what I already said I'd do just to stick up for your friend. I'm sure you're just trying to calm the situation but please, at least read what I said first, then you wouldn't have to waste your time. As of now, I'm done and not going back on the subject. Feel free to remove this at your discretion. <font face="Trebuchet MS">[[User:Earisu|<font color="#CC66FF">Earisu</font> <font face="Times New Roman" size="3" color="#CC6699">♥</font>]]|[[User talk:Earisu|<font color="#999999"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]]</font> 00:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:41, 22 June 2009
 |
This is not a forum for general discussion of KojiDude, unless it is positive. In that case, it is perfectly O.K. |
Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)
Low to moderate level of vandalism
[view • purge • update]
4.67 RPM according to Huggle. Bot is down. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 23:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
 My Sexy Archives |
|---|
Hi, this is my talk page (me being KojiDude). Feel free to leave me a message.
- If you're looking to reach me off-wiki you can E-mail me at koji@dbzvortex.co.uk, or contact me at my forum. Your best bet besides that would be my PlayStaion Network adress (CptJakHarkness) which isn't as much of a long shot as you might think...
Rules to Follow unless, of course, you want your message deleted
- Don't be a dick
- Try not to insult me. If I'm acting like an ass or breaking policy, just report me. I'm sure someone at WP:AN/I will deal with me.
- Don't ask me to do tedious work. Unless it pertains to one of the projects I'm part of, I'm not going to do it. Even then it's a stretch. If you've got a truck full of double redirects, you're asking the wrong guy.
- Don't try to call in-civility on me for something stupid. Swearing isn't un-civil, it's American damnit.
- Don't argue with me. I'm right. And if I'm wrong, I'm going to pretend I'm right until either you shut up, or I end up at ArbCom. I've never been taken to ArbCom before, so odds are good you'll shut up.
- I'm expecting that not alot of people will read this, since it's at the end and most people will have realized how flippant my rules are by now, but don't break up conversations. If we start a conversation on a talk page, leave it there (unless you're bulletproof3:16).
A note regarding the WPVG Newsletter
Due to an apparent lack of interest, the WPVG Newsletter will be switching from a monthly publication schedule to a quarterly one. The next issue be delivered on July 1, 2009, and will pertain to the second quarter of the calendar year. If you have any comments regarding this, or suggestions to improve the newsletter, please post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter.
- —VG Newsletter Contributors
- Notice delivery by –xeno talk 15:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Daymeeee
You not buying this guy as much as I'm not? He's trying to convince that "Irving met his end" means he survived, got off the boat, and lived ever after? He's trying to convince me that shaking heads, looking disdainful, and saying, "We're the only three left" means the others got lifted off for medical attention? I just want to make sure that I'm not the only one who's completely not buying this. It seems to me that he's being antagonistic for no reason, now. I just want to confirm that I'm not the only one getting this vibe... This is a really absurd debate, though. --The Guy complain edits 02:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- You're not the only one. It's a stretch of an argument that's using speculation to say that things are speculation (if you can follow that). Some people were clearly killed, bodies shown, comments made by characters, but Wesker really wasn't confirmed one way or the other. The circumstances of his death are different than the others, so the decision for him shouldn't be used to cover all the others. Personally, at this point, I get the feeling Daymeeee is arguing just for the sake of arguing.--Koji† 02:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm feeling he's arguing just to argue as well (that's what being antagonistic is, in case that wasn't clear... I should've made it clear). His argument at this point is majorly pulling at straw ends, trying to find some pressure point. He clearly wants to feel like he has some type of control in this decision. I really think it's a pride issue; he doesn't want to admit defeat. Either way, this is getting long and annoying. I could probably find an external source explicitly stating the deaths of these characters, and he would probably say they're wrong because they're not in-game. I'm getting sick of having to spell everything out for this guy. He's trying to get us on technicalities way too hard. I'm seriously questioning his intentions: are they to help the article, or something else? --The Guy complain edits 02:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm getting the personal intentions vibe too. If we're lucky, he'll come back tommorrow and just go "Fuck it, I'm gonna go donate shoes to the salvation army instead." but judging by his contributions that might be wishful thinking. I don't know, I was originally only in this to be cheeky and see how it eventually played out. If it wasn't for apathy, I'd probably take him to ANI and let it die that way.--Koji† 02:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- It's gotta be personal intentions. I've never seen something deplete to this point where every word is specifically being picked apart with the intention of turning my own words against me (in a very not-believable way, I might add). He's already expressed that he believes these characters have died, so he's just opposing it to oppose it. I just want some of these other people to come around and help. His debate is a very large, unbelieveable stretch that, if you think about logically, doesn't make any sense. If you think about it logically, he's clearly trying to get me on a technicality, but to what end? To improve the article? A 4-hour long debate involving him carefully picking apart my words and claiming that they are saying something different is improvement to the article? Consistency is definitely importance-based, too. Minor characters shouldn't be held to the regulations of major characters, and vice versa. I'm tempted to go in there right now and say, "Well, I guess Excella didn't die then either. Neither was it a pile of dead bodies, they were actually just passed out from last night's party. Oh, and Uroboros? Yeah, we have a bad rodent problem." Also, I'm unfamiliar with the terms ANI. Please inform me. --The Guy complain edits 03:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm getting the personal intentions vibe too. If we're lucky, he'll come back tommorrow and just go "Fuck it, I'm gonna go donate shoes to the salvation army instead." but judging by his contributions that might be wishful thinking. I don't know, I was originally only in this to be cheeky and see how it eventually played out. If it wasn't for apathy, I'd probably take him to ANI and let it die that way.--Koji† 02:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm feeling he's arguing just to argue as well (that's what being antagonistic is, in case that wasn't clear... I should've made it clear). His argument at this point is majorly pulling at straw ends, trying to find some pressure point. He clearly wants to feel like he has some type of control in this decision. I really think it's a pride issue; he doesn't want to admit defeat. Either way, this is getting long and annoying. I could probably find an external source explicitly stating the deaths of these characters, and he would probably say they're wrong because they're not in-game. I'm getting sick of having to spell everything out for this guy. He's trying to get us on technicalities way too hard. I'm seriously questioning his intentions: are they to help the article, or something else? --The Guy complain edits 02:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Not sure this is something that needs to be taken to ANI, you know? Lychosis T/C 03:40, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sure it is, ANI is where you dump things that you don't care to spend time on anymore.--Koji† 20:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I lol'd. --The Guy complain edits 01:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Army of Two
Just incase you didn't see it on the discussion page I thought I'd say it here; the Missions section to me seem completely redundent as all the information in it is/can be covered in the plot section, it also clutters up the page with lots of small bits under new headlines. 'The Ninjalemming'' 17:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- That's what I was thinking as I re-wrote it. I'd support removing it and probably would have done it myself sooner or later.--Koji† 20:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)