User talk:Lugnuts: Difference between revisions

"Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven".

John Milton, Paradise Lost (1667)

"Can't believe it's been nearly 11 years since them slags smashed into the twin towers".

Danny Dyer, Twitter (2012)

"People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people, Jeremy".

Super Hans, (2005)

"The chance to march across Europe with the greatest general of all time and kill Belgians. Marvellous!"

AJ Rimmer, (3m years from now)

Now then, now then.
Six down
Ten Ground and Down

Nomination of Julius Mensah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julius Mensah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius Mensah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 09:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Samson Awiah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samson Awiah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samson Awiah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 10:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Sheraz Khalid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheraz Khalid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheraz Khalid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 10:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

"A Good Man (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect A Good Man (upcoming film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 5#A Good Man (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Latvian

Hey there! If you have time, can you contribute to Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Latvian submissions for the Academy Award for Best International Feature Film/archive1 and give comments, or perhaps support or oppose the nomination? Thanks, GeraldWL 09:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Yes, I remember the initial GA nom before Christmas, but have forgotten about it since. Will take a look - thanks for the reminder. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Fix: it's FL. Thanks for the scan! Looking forward. GeraldWL 09:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Burkett (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Burkett (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Burkett (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

"Shaheen Shah Afradi" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Shaheen Shah Afradi. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 8#Shaheen Shah Afradi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. USaamo ^(t@lk) 17:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Removal of cast IMDB credits

Hi -- I'm curious why you reverted https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Faces_of_Children&diff=999122615&oldid=999121225 (without comment) my additions to the cast list using IMDB links where there is no Wiki article. Thanks! SmallRepair (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I can't find the exact guide/policy right now, but we don't link to external sites in the body of the article like that. I've never seen cast lists linked that way, and I've worked on a lot of film articles in the past 15 years or so. Also, Template:IMDb name is for use in the external links section of the person in question. If you need further, drop a post at WT:FILM for more. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Correction

Hi ! In first let me inform you that i am not tracking you.There is some mistake on the last fixtures of Momentum One Day Cup 2021.If i edit this mistake then you tag me with previous statement.As you know that this page has only one editor so it is difficult for you to update accurate information.so,please grant me permission to edit this page freely without any problem mention to me.(Fade258 (talk) 08:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC))

Correction

Hi ! please correct fixture date of Ireland vs uae.(Fade258 (talk) 12:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC))

Hi. It has been corrected due to the date change because of COVID. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Irish cricket team in the UAE

Hi! Why aren't we updating on suspension/postponement of the matches in Ireland Vs. UAE series page? I thought, we should reflect this information till the time more clarify is shared on this. Vikram Maingi (talk) 10:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

All the salient points are covered in the lead. The matches could still be rescheduled. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Disambiguation not for empty talk pages

Hi, thank you for your recent addition to Guzelkoy. However, just a hint: it is not necessary to create a talk page with Template:WikiProject Disambiguation: See the section Usage in the template's documentation and the corresponding footnote with the two links to the discussions. --Cyfal (talk) 17:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Hmmm, once discussion from 10 years ago with one person saying they don't like it, and another from six years ago with someone saying it's "an inconweenience". Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, but on the other hand also no one who gives a reason why the template is useful at this place. --Cyfal (talk) 18:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

If it's not useful, then take it to WP:TFD. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

That revert...

That was actually an LTA, who is obsessed with gender and pedophilia, and who likes to doxx and harass editors. If you run into them, feel free to email your neighborhood admin, or ArbCom. Thanks, and take care, Drmies (talk) 17:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Sounds like a nice person. Thanks for the heads-up. The change did look a bit odd, but I didn't think to question it TBH. Thanks again! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:04, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Rashid Khan

Hey,

We built this encyclopedia on information, right? Why was the Rashid Khan Ultimate Kricket Challenge edit of mine reverted exactly? No hard feelings just thought it was notable enough to be on his page, SpongeRick Starpants (talk) 14:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi. WP:BLPREMOVE. It may be "factually accurate" but I doubt it's notable, certainly not in the context of Khan's career. I've asked for further input before I take the article to AfD. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Does Instagram count as reliable sourcing? If so then boy it's out there, SpongeRick Starpants (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not really. I've nominated it for deletion, so best to ask there. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Turkey Barnstar of National Merit
		For creating all those articles on Turkish villages. I am jealous of your speed. Scorpions13256 (talk) 03:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Scorps! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

I found it strange how nobody else seemed to notice your work. I can't wait to see you become the first person to create 100,000 articles. Scorpions13256 (talk) 03:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm sure some people notice, afterall I'm Wikipedia's loveable rascal! Thanks again. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you and farewell!

		The Cricket Barnstar
		For continuous contibutions to the cricket project in creating new articles and expanding our coverage like a machine! StickyWicket (talk) 11:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Lugnuts. Been meaning to give you a barnstar for a while! I've decided to retire, but wanted to wish you all the best. PS: Did Emerging Cricket ever figure out who you were? StickyWicket (talk) 11:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Why thank you. Sad to hear your are retiring - you've done some amazing work over the years here. No, E/C have not done so yet! Although I'm quite happy to speak to them. All the best for the future, and take take care. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 11:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Pearl Jam and Soundgarden

Hi, you're right about a single member in common in Pearl Jam and Soundgarden, but they have an entire album in common as "Temple of the Dog". In fact, by this rule, Pearl Jam and Soundgarden belong to this category more than Soundgarden and Audioslave (same singer). Bass-Kuroi (talk) 19:57, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi. If you think the guidance should be changed, then your best move is to start a WP:RFC on the talkpage of the infobox template. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Sam wisniewski- assistance

Not sure how to add to wiki. Sam wisniewski youngest player from england to be selected for t10 tournament. Selected for pune devils. Tournament starts 28th. Thanks Ramonezzz (talk) 23:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry, I don't have any interest in T10 cricket. Have a read of this in the meantime. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vladimir Krstić (rower)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vladimir Krstić (rower) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 10:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

You've been here ten+ years, time enough to cast your peepers at WP:NOLY. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Papers Past

Hey Lugnuts. I've been noticing that many of your New Zealand cricketer articles are coming under fire. It really is a shame that some incompetent editors are now trying to remove notable sportspeople from Wikipedia. Anyways, I've found a source that may help you with proving that some of these New Zealand cricketers meet GNG. At this link, there are digitized newspaper articles from the 19th and 20th centuries in New Zealand, which have proven helpful in trying to find sources (for example, while searching for refs for Thomas Austin (cricketer), I found a whole bunch of cricket reports concerning the man and even an obituary). Either way, I hope that helps. Best wishes, Lettler^{hello • contribs} 16:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you - very helpful. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you and goodbye

	Oldest cricket bat
	Hi, I too have decided to go the way of Associate. I think that Omani international AFD tipped me over the edge. Anyway before I go I wanted to say thank you for all your help while I've been here and thanks for being the one to update every article after every match. Goodbye and good luck in the future. CreativeNorth (talk) 16:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry to hear your dissatisfaction with the project. I'm up to the crease next, but don't worry, I'm going to be the wall. All the best for the future. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ulkenpinari, Corum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ulkenpinari, Corum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jenyire2 (talk) 18:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jenyire2: - apologies, typo on the word "redirect" which I've now fixed. Should redirect to the correct spelling. Ta. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Super Smash and Women's Tournaments

Hi, great work with the Super Smash (cricket) season pages. I have a suggestion for you. Could you please also add the points table and results for the women's tournaments to the Super Smash seasons since 2018-19 where each competition is joint? From 2018-19 the Super Smash consists of both a men's and women's tournament. These pages are 2018-19 Super Smash, 2019-20 Super Smash and 2020-21 Super Smash which currently only feature the men's results and are missing the women's. Socks 01 (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Socks. Thanks for this - I thought they did have their own pages, but I guess not. Might be best if they were stand-alone articles, much like the Women's Big Bash League seasons. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 11:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Maybe if the article was at 2020–21 Super Smash (women), it could be started from that. Happy to help if you want to start it off. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Regading manual undo of description added of Siddhant sharma

Hi lugnuts, i have added changes to siddhant sharma https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siddhant_Sharma with proper references and citations. still u have undo the changes. may i know the reasom ? What is wrong with the changes added ? They are proper references of siddhant sharma that he has represented DDCA in all tournaments and all links to those tournament scorecard are added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayushsh149 (talk • contribs) 12:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2020–21 Ranji Trophy

The article 2020–21 Ranji Trophy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Didn't happen, so not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

"2021 ICC Men's T20 World Cup (temp)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2021 ICC Men's T20 World Cup (temp). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 1#2021 ICC Men's T20 World Cup (temp) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

"from Swedish Wikipedia"

Hello! I assure I do know that we do not use any other Wikipedia articles, domestic or foreign, as references to reliably source facts. At Gunnar Cederschiöld my edit summary was "from" not "ref:". Swedish Wikipedia has begun to add info boxes via something called "Wikidata-objekt". There were several reliable sources somehow embedded in that in Cederschiöld's case so I couldn't get them from there by what I'd have to call normal editing, as I know it. I've added one source now to the English article. Still don't know how/where to get the rest to transfer. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for the update. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 11:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

is there life left in German cinema task force?

Hi Lugnuts,

I am a user who works mainly in the German Wikipedia, but I thought I would focus some attention here too, for instance on the German Film Award, which seems quite neglected, and is missing most of its potential sub-pages. So I just entered my name in the German cinema task force – and then discovered that "Active Members" is a bit of a misnomer: The first four names haven't been active anywhere in Wikipedia for many years now. The user next on the list, JanderVK is still around, but has less than 50 edits in the last two years. The last user on the list is banned indefinitely – so that leaves you as the only really active member of this task force! Although even you may now be focused more on other things, right? So basically the task force is dead – shouldn't its page own up to this sorry truth somewhere? I will unfortunately not be the one reviving it, since I have plenty tasks in the German Wikipedia that I still want to focus on. But I will work on the German Film Award here, which I can also talk to the Film awards task force about, if there are still active people over there... Greetings from --Sprachraum (talk) 11:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I think all the (film) taskforces are technically dead, but that doesn't mean that no one is working on those areas within its scope. I put my name against all the film taskforces when they were setup, and still dip into each of them from time to time in a round-about way. For example, with the German one, I'll be working on the next edition of the Berlin Film Festival, along with anything related to the German submission for the Best International Feature Film at the Oscars. Maybe worth dropping a note at WT:FILM to see if there are any other users interested in German film as a specific area, or those who simply don't know the taskforce(s) exist. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 11:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok thanks Lugnuts, happy to hear you will be working on my hometown festival the Berlinale – always a worthy endeavour, even after it had to move and split up this year due to the pandemic. I'll remove myself from the German cinema task force for now, since I signed on to two others already (Filmmakers and Film awards), that seem to still have a bit of life in them. They should be able to answer most of my questions, but if not I will take up your suggestion and write on the main film project talk page. Have a good day. --Sprachraum (talk) 12:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

No problem. Yes, Berlin is a great city - been there a couple of times. Have a good day too. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Just curious

Hi Lugnuts,

it's certainly not an important matter, but I'm asking because I'm not well versed yet in the English Wikipedia: Why was this change in System Crasher, from {{short description|2019 film}}to {{short description|2019 German fiction feature film}} wrong? To me (and coming from the what I'm used to in the German Wikipedia), "2019 film" seems too unspecific, even for a short description. Alternatively I had thought about adding the director's name; had you adjusted it in that direction, it would have made sense to me. Having clicked randomly amongst other German films submitted to the Oscars (e.g. The Captain from Köpenick or Nowhere in Africa, there doesn't seem to be an universal standard for the short description that would limit it to just "2019 film". Greetings from --Sprachraum (talk) 12:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I was doing some general fixes on the article, and changed the S/D at the same time. As it goes, there was this discussion about the S/D only yesterday. I tend to go for the shortest S/D to keep it simple. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. So there isn't a standard, but you are trying to establish one. I will adhere to that going forward, and have put that talk page on my watch list. --Sprachraum (talk) 13:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Another thing...

Dear Lugnuts,

sorry to bother you with another learning curve of mine: The topic of deleting redirects has irritated me, because in the German Wikipedia it is considered not just standard but actually good practice to clean up after a page move, by adjusting all the links that led to the old page, and then deleting the old page once there is nothing linked to it anymore. These orphaned pages are routinely speed-deleted by admins within minutes upon request. As I have found out after this and this, the philosophy here in the English Wikipedia is quite different. You seem more worried about breaking possible external links, while the Germans seem more worried about leaving unused/unneeded page rests lying about everywhere! Quite telling, actually.

Again, I am happy to learn and adapt to the standards here, but after this revert today, I seem to still not understand the criteria for deletion, even though I have read through them. In fact I would have thought there is good reason to delete in all three cases:

• The first move, "Bill Johnson (editor)" to "Bill Johnson (film editor)", is something I intend to do all across the Category:Film editors, since there are many different occupations containing the word "editor", and the standard interpretation would be that of a book editor or a newspaper editor. So I feel that film editors should always have the more specific addition – and most already have, but there are quite a few articles that only have an (editor) added to the name. In such a case, I feel that leaving the old page as a redirect is the perpetuation of a false practice; it would be better to make a clean break and establish what should be the standard.

• In the second case, "Vi (editor)", the redirect wasn't even a leftover from a move – it had always been just a redirect to Vi, and since 2015 the far better and more precise redirect Vi (text editor) already exists. Why not then delete the imprecise page, in order to avoid it being used by any article?

• The third case seems to me to be the most clear cut: The German Film Award is called "Deutscher Filmpreis", which is singular, and remains singular even when used to talk about the sum of all the award categories; the event is never called the "Deutsche Filmpreise". Therefore I moved the page German Film Awards 2015 (the only year page in existence) to German Film Award 2015. Now I can live with that redirect remaining, but there was also a redirect called 64th German Film Awards – which was an error, since the 2015 ceremony is actually the 65th. And even if one wants to have such a relink to the not-yet-existent page "German Film Award 2014", one would want to call it 64th German Film Award without an "s". So surely, I thought, this time a speedy delete should happen – but no. Instead, I was advised by Onel5969 to take this to RfD. Ok, so I looked at that page, but please, before I delve into all that complication: Could you (and/or User:Onel5969) advise me on the likelihood of this delete (or the other two above) being approved after RfD? Because if none of these three cases are ever cause for deletion according to the norms here, I will just shake my head in puzzlement and work on more important things. Greetings from --Sprachraum (talk) 15:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi. In short, if the redirect is a likely search term, it is kept. See also WP:CHEAP. The only examples I can think of off the top of my head where they get deleted is an impossible typo, or the term "upcoming film". I wouldn't worry about leaving redirects behind. Hope that helps. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Sprachraum, hi. While not going into the philosophy behind the redirects, my action was solely procedural, as your rational for speedy deletion did not appear to meet our criteria for speedy deletion. Rather, I suggested you take it to RfD (Redirects for Discussion). If I was casting a !vote at RfD (which is something I do not do frequently), I would most likely vote to delete, for both the reasons you stated in your CSD, as well as the fact that the redirect is not mentioned in the target. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok thanks Onel5969. Yes, that helps, and means I will take case No. 3 to RfD. What about the first case "Bill Johnson (editor)", since I will be doing quite a bit of that sort of moving? You agree with keeping that redirect, even though it would always be better to have the more precise (film editor) – and a search would still find the page without the other redirect existing, as I have tested with "James Galloway (editor)" for example?

Nomination of Dennis Brady for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dennis Brady is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Brady until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 19:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Dab talk pages

There's no need to create them. At least not if all they will contain is the project banner. You can see its documentation. – Uanfala (talk) 19:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

See above. Maybe an RfC would help. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh, you've already been told. No, we don't need an RfC, we've got consensus that: a) dab talk pages shouldn't be created if all they will contain is the dab banner, and b) that it's OK to add that banner to talk pages of non-dabs if they're relevant to the dab project, and c) it's fine to add it to talk pages of dabs if they already have some other substantial content. If you would like to change that consensus, you can then start an RfC. But if you're not interested in changing it, then you're expected to stick to it, just like everybody else is. It's not difficult, given that adhering to the consensus will take you less effort than ignoring it. If you feel very strongly about that, sure, do what you want, as long as you're happy to expend effort doing work that others judge to have a net negative value. – Uanfala (talk) 20:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

One person not liking it from ten years ago is hardly a consensus. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Awards and nominations for A Copy of My Mind

Hi, appreciate that you did a check on the page, but it's really discouraging that you reverted the edits without giving me a chance to provide said reliable sources. All of the information I added were based on reliable, independent sources. These awards are given out in the Indonesian domestic film industry, which you may not be familiar with. I thought the main awards did not require an additional column for Ref. because these are major awards that have individual articles for each year's edition. Even if these were unreliable sources, you could have left me a message and gave, say, 2-3 hours (not even 24 hours) to perform edits to satisfy Wikipedia standards. Now that you've hastily deleted them, I can't undo your change due to conflict and now have to redo the whole thing manually, whereas had you given me a note about it, all I needed to do was add the references to the award table. Again, understand you think you're enforcing the rules, but you could've done it with more consideration. CalliPatra (talk) 15:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC).

Or you could have added the sources when you added the info, and not leave it 2-3 hours, which can become 2-3 days, weeks, months, etc. Let's face it, you could be hit by a bus tomorrow. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Wild Pear Tree.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Wild Pear Tree.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Hershel Shanks

He was actually more of a magazine publisher and editor, and writer about archaeology, than he is an archaeologist as such (certainly in terms of academic credentials)... AnonMoos (talk) 01:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Babakale, Ayvacık

On 8 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Babakale, Ayvacık, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the manufacturing of knife cutlery at Babakale in Turkey goes back to the 1720s, started by masters immigrated from Kazakhstan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Babakale, Ayvacık. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Babakale, Ayvacık), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Sock

Hi Lugnuts, is this a sock? They have restored their edits. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, they're a sock (more info). It's their fourth or fifth account in a month. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll keep an eye. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi

Anudip Ghosh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Hi! I'll keep this simple, what should we do about this editor? I'm pretty sure you're aware about what they've been doing. ☎️ Churot ^DancePop 08:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I think they are a classic case of WP:CIR and will no doubt be blocked shortly. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hamdiye, Güney

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hamdiye, Güney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SoyokoAnis 14:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Mudurnu District Entries Comment

Hi, I have been linking the Turkish village articles to the Villages of Turkey article and notices a lot of the articles for villages in Mudurnu district are described as being in Hizan district in the body of the article. I am going through things to update, but thought i should pass the info along to you. Ulric1313 (talk) 20:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Ahh, thanks for spotting that! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Reporting aggressive behavior

Hi, I don't know how to contact an admin to report someone for making aggressive remarks and saw your extensive history so wanted your assistance in the matter. You can see in the following link [1] an editing dispute I had with User:A Simple Human

I provided the fact that the table should be updated according to the source in Cricinfo while User:A Simple Human didn't agree and then made an aggressive remark in the edit history for no reason. I'm not sure how to proceed but I don't think this kind of attitude should be tolerated, especially when I did nothing to provoke such behavior. I hope you can help me by pointing out how to report this person to get a warning against them. Thank you. User:Saimcheeda

Hi. First step is to discuss the issue with the user on their talkpage. If that goes no-where, then go for the article's talkpage, and ask for other editors of that page to add their input. Still no joy from that, head to WP:ANI, but make sure you have plenty of evidence in the form of page diffs. Hope that helps. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Ireland Wolves in Bangladesh

Hi - Are you planning to create an article for this tour? I am going to put something together this evening, but thought I would check if you were already on it. Bs1jac (talk) 18:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi. No, I wasn't planning on doing this one - go for it! Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

@Bs1jac: I'm in. I've been creating BD A series articles for some times. Human (talk) 21:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

@A Simple Human:. All done. Feel free to add more. Bs1jac (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

@Bs1jac: @Lugnuts: Doesn't this series fail WP:CRIN as the series is not a "top series". HawkAussie (talk) 05:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Possibly, but with the coverage in the Irish press, along with other sources, it should meet WP:GNG. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I checked for other similar tours over the last few years, all of which have pages, so figured this one was ok? Matches will be first class etc. Bs1jac (talk) 07:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

@Bs1jac: I created an article for Afg A tour of Ban last year but got deleted due to this reason. Quite weird when some articles gets noticed and others don't. Human (talk) 08:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Move discussion closure

Hi. You closed the move discussion at Talk:WeatherTech SportsCar Championship as "no consensus". Given that of the nine users who took part in the discussion, only one supported the original title, and everyone else either supported one of the proposed titles or were neutral, could you explain the reasoning behind your decision? The majority of people in the end supported the original proposal and frankly I think the arguments behind it were best founded in policy, but also the full series name received support, so a move to either one would have been reasonable in my opinion. Thanks. Carfan568 (talk) 21:44, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I read it as a no consensus to move it to the proposed title. No problem if you want to undo that close and ask for someone else to look at it. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Infact, there's not that many neutral votes, but plenty of opposes. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

In the end there were five supporters and three opposers for "IMSA SportsCar Championship", but as I said I don't think the opposers had strong arguments against using it. "IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship" had four supporters and one opposer. Carfan568 (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you, but since I couldn't find information about it, what would be the correct way to undo that close and where should I ask for someone else to look at it? Also, regarding your comment that you read it as no consensus for the proposed title, did you take a look at the other proposed titles (in particular "IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship")? Thanks. Carfan568 (talk) 17:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I've just self-reverted and put a note on the talkpage for whoever makes the close in the future. Hope that helps. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I think the discussion needs to be restarted, not reopened. I think the closure was appropriate. I also believe that 359's behavior is concerning.... -GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 17:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Might be best to drop a note at WP:AN to get an uninvolved admin to cast an eye. Just to be clear - I'm neutral on the whole discussion, and was picking off the oldest ones from the request move backlog. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

• Saw the note at AN and took a quick look at the RM. It looks like a WP:TRAINWRECK (carwreck?) and a no consensus close is reasonable given the lack of consensus on where to move it to. While I agree with Carfan568 that there's a consensus that the current title is not ideal, I can't easily figure out what name participants think is better. In that situation, a no consensus close followed by a new RM is probably the best idea. — Wug·a·po·des​ 23:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Wugs! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:51, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

• Hi there; i also saw your words at AN and went for a look; though i'm not an admin, i thought a second view might be helpful. I came here to say i think your close was quite right, there is no consensus to move to any particular title, though there may be a consensus to move, but i see Wugapodes has already said that! Anyway, in my view you were correct; happy days, Lindsay^Hello 16:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Lindsay - reassuring to hear. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

GAs and AFDs

I see that you often cite GA as a reason to keep at AFDs. If you happen to comfortably ignore my rationale that GA and notability can be reassessed, there have been quite a few AFDs on song GAs, this, this, this, this. I would not go on and on with this list, and don't assume that I "forgot" about any. HĐ (talk) 03:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

"Often" As in twice. In the past 13-14 years. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Now you know GAs can be nominated for AFDs. Which is not supposed to be something out of the blue. HĐ (talk) 10:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Sweet merciful heavens! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Day night women's matches

On Australia women's cricket team in New Zealand in 2020–21 and England women's cricket team in New Zealand in 2020–21, the IP appears to be correct that Cricinfo doesn't list the matches starting at 15:00 as day night matches (see [2], [3], [4], [5]). Is there any sources that say they are day/night matches? Joseph2302 (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for this - I've changed them. For the record, the IP is a long-term block evader, who continues with harassment some two+ years after being blocked. Happy days. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

No worries, I was sure there was a reason for reverting. Though just like a broken clock is right twice a day, it seems an annoying sock can do correct things occasionally ;) Joseph2302 (talk) 12:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Otakar Rademacher

Come to think of it, wasn't this how you got into the Olympics in the first place? Hope you are well! Canadian Paul 21:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

@Canadian Paul: what a good memory! It's all Félix de Pomés' fault! Yes, all good here thanks - hope you are well too. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2019–20 Regional One Day Cup

The article 2019–20 Regional One Day Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-existent tournament; article created prior to (another) restructuring of Pakistan domestic cricket in 2018 merged the regional and departmental competitions into the 2018–19 Quaid-e-Azam One Day Cup. Article was later moved to current title, presumably to be used (following another restructuring) for the 2019–20 Pakistan Cup competition, but that was ultimately not held due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 15:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Public domain

A claim like that is impossible to directly source. I would have to link to all the records from 1955 and 1956 to prove it. Also, for proof that the book it is based on (and all the movie adaptations before it if you want to get pedantic) are in the public domain due to 95-year expiration, I would have to yet again cite a source that talks about the 95 year rule (at least), if not provide records to prove that those were indeed published and recorded in the Copyright Office at that time. All adding up to about 8 or 10 different sources. It is also kind of weird that I would put a source in to have the reader specifically look for something that isn't there to prove a point.

It just so happens that I know how to check whether or not a film is in the public domain due to having not been renewed, and am aware of the fact that lawyers could potentially say "But wait a minute, it's based on work X which is still copyrighted, therefore the film is still copyrighted despite not being renewed," but in this case they can't do that because Ramona (the 19th century novel) went PD a very long time ago.

So there probably should be a note somewhere on every Wikipedia article about a piece of media, at least in the infobox, pertaining to the copyright status of it, especially if it is in the public domain. It's already (I think) included in Wikidata in some places IIRC, but in order to get the evidence you just have to look for it and know what to look for. I can't point you to a source that directly says, infallibly so, "this work is in the public domain" without therefore also referencing the things I just mentioned. PseudoSkull (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

February, 2021

Hi. Can you explain me why you are moving this article to draft and making reverts again and again? I haven't seen anyone else except you doing this, they are rather helping to improve this article. If you continue doing this you will be blocked. Thanks.

It's simply not ready to be in the article space. Can you explain how a brand new account knows how to make an article like that? Would you like to declare any other accounts you've edited with? Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Category renaming frustration

Hi Lugnuts,

I see that you have created plenty of categories for film directors, so could you help me out here on CfD? Either with support for what I propose as a speedy rename, or with some constructive help as to how to go about it in order to achieve a necessary and perfectly proper renaming that costs me the least amount of time and motivation? I experience the myriad bureaucratic obstacles here in the en-WP as life-sapping. Thanks! --Sprachraum (talk) 12:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi. In short, the category should match the article title, esp. when there's two film directors of the same name. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for answering, Lugnuts. As I pointed out in the linked discussion, I've found numerous examples of the redundant (director) being left out in the "Films directed by" category title, including Films directed by George Marshall and Films directed by Robert Stevenson – both of which you have edited on yourself. Admittedly way back in 2008, but both director's articles at that stage already had the parentheses disambiguation in their article name. I searched through 500 director categories now, and this is far more prevalent than the redundant style; it isn't even close. Are you saying they are all doing it wrong?

I wouldn't worry too much about the categories for now, esp. if you're working on expanding/creating articles instead. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

That's exactly my point. All this bureaucratic nonsense is robbing me of the time and motivation to work on articles. --Sprachraum (talk) 14:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

ODI List

Do you want me to create a list on similar pattern for players who have played more than 300 ODI's? or may be 200 ODIs// If yes, let me know the cut off and can work accordingly. Ankurc.17 (talk) 11:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I think maybe 200 would be the cut-off for the ODI list, as there's only about 25 or so with 300 or more matches. Plus this list on Cricinfo also has the 200 mark as the start point. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 11:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Collapsible templates

I've reinstated my edits, removing the collapsible template – if it is not to be used in cases such as these, what purpose does it serve? _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 18:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Best ask at the talkpage of WP:COLLAPSE. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I'll check usage, and maybe list at TFD. Did you have any other objections to my changes, since you reverted again despite me having removed the collapsible templates (although looking at the byte count, I may have made a mess of it!)? _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 18:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Let me check the diffs and I'll get back to you. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Soviet film Othello released in 1955 or 1956?

I changed the release year of Soviet film Othello from 1956 to 1955, because in the Russian version of Wikipedia the release year is listed as 1955. And on Rotten Tomatoes it's also listed as 1955. But if you don't accept that as a reliable source, I won't do it anymore. Petrandreev13 (talk) 15:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for this. Another WP is not a reliable source, and ideally we'd need something like a film review showing a release date from that time to WP:V the info. Thanks again. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

I've found something here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329933575_Sergei_Yutkevich%27s_Othello_Revisited_A_View_from_the_21st_Century. It says there "The article summarizes and compares various opinions on Sergei Yutkevich’s 1955 film “Othello” expressed both behind and beyond the Iron Curtain and after the collapse of the USSR." and "In 1955, he filmed Othello with Sergei Bondarchuk as the Moor." It's not a reliable source, I just did a quick search trying to find English sources. Also here: https://filmfed.com/movies/12po18u33c8-othello, here: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/the-critics-a-modest-moor-with-much-to-be-modest-about-1319574.html and here: https://lbennie.medium.com/the-moor-of-hollywood-an-analysis-of-oliver-parkers-othello-6ae555dec6ef, where it says "Sergei Yutkevich's 1955 Soviet production". And also here: http://www.alexandermgross.com/othello1.html, where it says "Welles's 1952 film was followed three years later by that of the Soviet director Sergei Yutkevich (1955)". Petrandreev13 (talk) 16:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Nice work - I'll have a closer look at them later and update the article. Thanks again. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:31, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

@Petrandreev13: - article updated and page moved to 1955. Thanks for your help. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Pierre Albrecht

Hi Lugnuts - just another Olympian note for you - it has since been determined that there were actually 2 different Pierre Albrechts who were basketball competitors for Switzerland at two successive Olympics - see [6] and [7]. More to come on the earlier-born one next week as well. Connormah (talk) 21:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Interesting! Thanks for the note and all your hard work in this area. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 03:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

@Connormah: - I've sorted this out and created a second profile. They are now at Pierre Albrecht (basketball, born 1927) and Pierre Albrecht (basketball, born 1931). Thanks again. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much for taking care of it, and likewise for your work here on Wikipedia in this area. Connormah (talk) 04:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:Films directed by Wolfgang Becker has been nominated for renaming

Category:Films directed by Wolfgang Becker has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Some falafel for you!

You do indeed make wikipedia not suck. Thank you! Clamless (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Did you really create 87,000 articles?

I see this on your user page, and I tried searching your contribs (limited to new page creation) set to limit:5000, and I'm still convinced this is a joke and I'm getting memed on. How the hell have you managed to do this? I have created a little over a hundred and it's been a whole exhausting undertaking. jp×g 05:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. It's actually a few more, but I don't count disambig pages and redirects that later become articles by other users. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of James Davis (wrestler) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Davis (wrestler) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Davis (wrestler) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bibliopole5795 (talk) 03:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mohammad Aamer (cricketer, born 1995) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Aamer (cricketer, born 1995) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Aamer (cricketer, born 1995) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 17:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Fran Jonas

On 12 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fran Jonas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that New Zealander Fran Jonas made her domestic cricket debut aged 15, and took three wickets in the final of the competition? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fran Jonas. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fran Jonas), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Impressive!

Truly remarkable! Almost 90 000 articles? I am dumbstruck. Hats off. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 08:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Hats off indeed. All in a days work... Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

aimelaime

Hi, I am sending you the official link to death certificates held by the French government https://deces.matchid.io/search

cordially aimelaime