User talk:Lugnuts: Difference between revisions

WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter

The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:13, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fresh Records (UK)

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Fresh Records (UK) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and give your reasons on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Mtking (talk) 02:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Fresh Records (UK)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Fresh Records (UK), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Fresh Records (UK) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fresh Records (UK) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fresh Records (UK) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking (talk) 00:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Go nuts! Lugnuts (talk) 06:40, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Trailer People

Hi, haven't done that much, just added a pic and added few details. Couldn't find a better cover on the internet to fit the infobox. Would luv to join the film project but am so busy at the moment with my private stuff. In fact, was trying to get a shape to Vášáryová's article, that's why I got to also Trailer People. B (s)well (m)anyway, n thanks for sharing a thought. Btw, u'd keep english articles in EN, and redirect the foreign film titles to EN language. Uzerakount (talk) 07:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Dunno how "the move" works, so I just redirected and left a message to fix it at Wikipedia:Cut_and_paste_move_repair_holding_pen#Repair_requests Uzerakount (talk) 08:22, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Got it now! Damn, that's much simplier. Uzerakount (talk) 08:28, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

East German films

Hi, I'm really grateful for your help filling them out.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:25, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

I'll create the rest of them at one point or other but don't want to open the flood gates too much! Some time I aim to transwiki all of the films currently on German wikipedia which might be tricky and produce some doubles, I'll definitely need help on that one! But not at the moment anyway...♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Isn't there a category for banned films? The Rabbit Is Me♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

The good thing is that the Argentine oldies I started like The Soul of the Accordion are increasingly appearing in google books and can be expanded a bit...♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:53, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Yeah see the source for Kilómetro 111. Its good to see and at last means that some content can be added to some of the films.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Notable?♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Notable?. Contains reliable sources...♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

LOL, its not speediable, I wonder how long it will be before it hits AFD.... Hehe. One could argue though that it is every bit as notable as the Rachel cut which we have an article on. This is more of a spoof more than anything at the shit people are voting to keep nowadays before of "reliable sources". They'll use the excuse of wide coverage in news as encyclopedia criteria to an exasperating level. So why not Bieber's hair I say, has enough reliable sources available eh? LOL I can just see the reason for nominating this for deletion.... somebody'll probably use "I hate Bieber" as a valid excuse to nominate...♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

OMG User:Prodego thinks its legit and AFD'd it!! Hehe!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Pizza connection

Lugnuts--I apologize for removing the reference. It was inadvertent. When I put in the awards section, I had meant to move the reference and I missed it. (Never do editing when you are sleepy).--Foobarnix (talk) 17:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes’’’. cooldenny (talk) 18:41, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Came across this...

I came across the conversation and was a bit surprised that no one has created the article... specially considering the number of redlinks to the (then) unwritten article. So I spent a few minutes and wrote Betrayal (1929 film). What do you think of a DYK that reads

"Did you know... that the 1929 film Betrayal was the last silent film directed by Lewis Milestone and the last silent performed by Gary Cooper?

Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:38, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

It's live

See Wikipedia:Future Films Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

ITN: 2011 Copa del Rey Final

-- tariqabjotu 06:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Wedding dress article

Hi there, I moved the article back to the original title (Wedding dress of Kate Middleton) as the move was controversial (see talk). I recommend Wikipedia:Requested moves if you disagree. Cheers, --KFP (contact | edits) 17:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Death of Osama bin Laden conspiracy theories

Hello. I am preparing a talk page post. I humbly request your input or suggestions. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Fake message box trolling

Do you accept that your fake message box wastes the time of people who have problems using a web browser as well as an able-bodied person? Is your joke worth wasting the time of somebody (for example) using a screenreader to slowly read through an already confusing page and have minutes of their life wasted by a trick?

You have now been made aware of one of many reasons why your prank is a potential problem. Given that the only benefit in keeping it is smug amusement, your leaving it there should be considered an act of belligerence, and there's your policy guideline for taking it down.

The fact that you are blatantly daring people to remove it is trolling, and that in itself is not the way to behave here. Even if you weren't spoofing the UI, putting content up with the express purpose of annoying and baiting other users is reprehensible behaviour and should be dealt with in the same way as any other disruption. Wenttomowameadow (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Apology

I am sorry if I seemed a bit rude or autonomus while reviewing your article. I will leave the little article alone. Shakinglord (talk) 17:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)