[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:Malcolmxl5: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 103: Line 103:
From the [[WP:BDAYCOM|Birthday Committee]], [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 22:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
From the [[WP:BDAYCOM|Birthday Committee]], [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 22:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
</div>
</div>

== Contested deletion ==

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --[[Special:Contributions/114.125.200.81|114.125.200.81]] ([[User talk:114.125.200.81|talk]]) 11:18, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:18, 11 April 2021

RPP

Hi! I had filed this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Sindhu_Joy Would you be able to address it? Thanks. Vikram Vincent 09:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Vikram Vincent 09:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
hth! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unrelated request (also at RFPP, about a page which you protected), don't know if you got the ping, here? Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ey up, sorry, I missed this one. When I looked at the protection log, I saw three periods of protection in ten years - two months, six months, and most recently, one month, and long periods without protection. That didn’t scream out to me that this was a page that needs to be protected indefinitely but, you know, I’m open to reviewing the protection I placed. I’ll have a look. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for undeletion of Barry Aycock for improvement

Hi- hoping we can discuss the article here? I feel like several sources were not cited in the previous published article, and I'm more than happy to make some adjustments. Please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachhedrick (talkcontribs) 15:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the article was nominated for discussion by an editor; you can find the discussion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Aycock. It was discussed for seven days and then I assessed the consensus of the discussion - all perfectly normal, this process happens hundreds of times every week.
The consensus was very clearly for deletion, that the subject does not meet inclusion criteria for an article in the encyclopaedia. The general notability criteria, which requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, is cited and also the inclusion criteria for politicians.
If you are going to improve the article, you will need multiple high-quality sources that discuss the subject in depth - what are your three best sources? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, thanks so much for your response. On the article in question, I included a variety of quality sources. Several were from from the largest news outlets within the designated region. On the biography at the front-end, In realize there was not a great deal of citations. I can remove that section for now, and include a citation to the profile when posted. I'm providing a link to the Ownership Biography section of the NBA's G-League Texas Legends. There is some additional information within this site, and I am more than willing to provide more if you'll consider reversing the deletion.

Thanks so much, take care! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachhedrick (talkcontribs) 22:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you able to link to your three best sources? I can then give you advice on the best way forward. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - here are three: • https://ingrams.com/article/50-missourians-you-should-know-2/https://showmetimes.com/Blogpost/upt9/Aycock-Considers-Missouris-Director-of-Agriculturehttps://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/southeast-missouri-businessman-named-to-judge-discipline-panel/article_24c0f15d-40ee-51eb-a4a4-3e958934f39f.html

I have others I'm happy to provide upon request. I look forward to your response.


-- Hi - just wondering if you were able to consider my request. Please let me know at your convenience, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachhedrick (talkcontribs) 21:11, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sarhaan Singh

Hello There, Want to discuss about Sarhaan Singh wikipedia. Now this actor have enough reliable news to create page. please take a look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anish1121 (talkcontribs) 15:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anish1121. Who is Sarhaan Singh? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for the Undeletion of "Rick Peterson (Politician)"

Rick Peterson most certainly meets Wikipedia's notability standards.

He has ran for leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada twice, has ran for member of parliament multiple times. He is also president of Canada's 6th largest capital investment company by investor connections. Peterson is currently running in Edmonton-Strathcona.

Peterson was also considered as a possible replacement for Peter Mackay. He is the former head of Suits and Boots, a conservative advocacy group.

It astonished me to learn he didn't have an article, considering how well known he is. BasedMises (talk) 23:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rick Peterson has been discussed twice on Wikipedia, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Peterson (Canadian politician) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Peterson (politician). The outcome of both discussion was that he did not meet inclusion criteria for an article in the encyclopaedia. Two criteria were cited: the first is WP:POLITICIAN, essentially that the person must have held office at a high level; the other is the general notability guideline, which requires that the person should have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Is there new information that shows he meets these inclusion criteria? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

removed AlexandriaHappyme22RexxS

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration


Sir, please provide protection to this page . The page has already vandilized many times by a lots of IP Users. Please provide semi-protection or pending changes for indefinite period of time. I have already request on WP:RPP. But, still I am requesting you. いちか かすが (talk) 06:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --114.125.200.81 (talk) 11:18, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]