User talk:Maximus7792: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:05, 15 September 2012

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/ConEmu.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 01:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitrij, You said, "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources". How many reliable sources article must contains? There is, for example, Scott Hanselman, jpsoft.com. Are they not reliable? Maximus7792 (talk) 07:52, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs are unreliable. You need at least reputable news media coverage. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 10:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitrij, is TechNet Magazine reliable enough? — Maximus7792 (talk) 10:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Dmitrij, You said, "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources". How many reliable sources article must contains? There is, for example, [http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ConEmuTheWindowsTerminalConsolePromptWeveBeenWaitingFor.aspx Scott Hanselman], [http://jpsoft.com/blogs/2012/04/windows-console-replacements-part-6-take-command-and-conemu/ jpsoft.com]. Are they not reliable? [[User:Maximus7792|Maximus7792]] ([[User talk:Maximus7792#top|talk]]) 07:52, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 :Blogs are unreliable. You need at least reputable news media coverage. —&nbsp;[[user:czarkoff|Dmitrij&nbsp;D. Czarkoff]] ([[user talk:czarkoff|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/czarkoff|track]]) 10:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
+::Dmitrij, is [http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/jj649372.aspx TechNet Magazine] reliable enough? —&nbsp;[[User:Maximus7792|Maximus7792]] ([[User talk:Maximus7792#top|talk]]) 10:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)