User talk:Muchris: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="infobox" width="100px" |
|||
|- |
|||
!align="center"|[[Image:Vista-file-manager.png|50px|Archive]]<br/>'''Archives:'''<br>[[/Archive 1|1]] | |
|||
|} |
|||
<!-- Template from Template:Welcomeg --> |
<!-- Template from Template:Welcomeg --> |
||
{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;" cellpadding="0" |
{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;" cellpadding="0" |
||
Line 63: | Line 68: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
|}<!--Template:Welcomeg--> |
|}<!--Template:Welcomeg--> |
||
== {{tl|Business-school-stub}} == |
|||
Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at [[Wikipedia:Stub]], at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, new stub types should be proposed prior to creation at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals]], in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. In the case of your new stub type, tertiary institutions are, for the most part, split by location rather than type of course taught (although there are one or two exceptions), and any split by this specific type of school would, like {{tl|lawschool-stub}}, use Business school as one split term, since X-school-stub is used for splits of primary and secondary schools. Your new stub type is currently listed at [[WP:WSS/D]] - please feel free to make any comments there as to any reason why this stub type should not be proposed for deletion at [[WP:SFD]]. And please, in future, propose new stub types first! [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:59, 23 March 2007
Archives: 1 | |
---|
|