[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:Nixeagle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
OTRR (talk | contribs)
I'm confused
Line 136: Line 136:
I was not sure if something was vandalism and reverted myself, that's why I used rollback. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754]] ([[User_talk:Rschen7754|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|contribs]]) ''' 06:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
I was not sure if something was vandalism and reverted myself, that's why I used rollback. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754]] ([[User_talk:Rschen7754|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|contribs]]) ''' 06:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
:Thanks, I appreciate it! --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754]] ([[User_talk:Rschen7754|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|contribs]]) ''' 06:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
:Thanks, I appreciate it! --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754]] ([[User_talk:Rschen7754|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|contribs]]) ''' 06:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

== I'm confused ==

On the subject of old time radio - I've placed a link to our group - www.otterprojectonline.info several times and every time it is deleted. I don't understand why.

We have valuable information concerning old time radio. We have the internets largest database of otr logs which is updated weekly. We have many articles by leading members of the otr community as well as series synopisis and and the internets second largest collection of pdf files of otr scripts.

Can you give me some understanding as to why our link is deleted and commercial otr sites are permitted to 'advertise' on wikipedia, just because they have a few links to otr sources?

Jim Beshires[[User:OTRR|OTRR]] 16:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:50, 30 September 2006

online

Please watch this page as I will respond here, to keep the convosation togather, if you wish me to respond on your page, please make a note of that in your message, thank you.
NO REVERTS OF THIS PAGE ARE ALLOWED, unless the page is blanked
-=[This page is NOT censered, NO COMMENT IS TO be removed, no matter how "offensive"]=-
Section headings are subject to editorial change, but the contents are not.

Please always sign your message by adding ~~~~ at the end of it. And please make your posts at the bottem of this page!!! Else I may lose your comments :)

Archives

I archive 4 days after last post.
Period Archive Link
Old stuff old stuff
March 2006 March 2006
April 2006 April 2006
May 2006 May 2006
June 2006 June 2006
July 2006 July 2006
August 2006 August 2006
September 2006 September 2006


how do you use media links like this one.[[Media:Example.ogg]]

Request for advice

I am concerned with the situation on Old time radio and related pages. You have been an uninvolved contributor with more experience in Wiki than I have. I am left with a feeling that there are some factions here who are following their own agendas rather than Wiki's. In the case of Dnyhagen he is not helping towards any positive agreed solution while working extremely hard on the page that is for his website (the page on Wiki nows comes second on my google search which makes me consider the rationale for it). Into this throw OldRadio who wants his website linked and Wikiotr whose comments suggest a (bad) history with Dnyhagen to say the least.

There are already rather too many external links on the page (in my mind & I've removed some) and I can see that, in trying to compromise, we may end up with a page of links rather than a quality article.

While not as involved as some editors it looks to me as though this may require some outside assessment by a broader body of Wikipedians to try and draw it to a conclusion as soon as possible and allow people to use time more productively. I hope you do not mind me contacting you but I am not sufficiently experienced to know the best way to settle this in a lasting and positive way (& no I have NO interest in any old time radio type sites!). Thanks & regards --Nigel (Talk) 12:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC) And as a PS - don't envy you the one above - I got the sharp edge of a tongue sometime ago on that![reply]

Signpost updated for September 25th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 39 25 September 2006 About the Signpost

Erik Möller declared winner in Board of Trustees election Wikimania 2007 to be held in Taipei
Arbitration clerk Tony Sidaway resigns Report from the Dutch Wikipedia
News and notes Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View RSS Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Georgia categories

Hi, I notice you speedy deleted Category:Georgia and Category:Government of Georgia as empty cats, under CSD C1. These two categories were useful despite being intentionally empty, as they were disambiguation categories. They served two purposes - firstly as disambiguation for users who know about categories and type the undisambiguated category into the search box, and secondly to catch mis-categorisation by editors who don't realise they should be categorising articles using the disambiguated categories (i.e. Category:Georgia (U.S. state) and Category:Georgia (country), or the equivalents for the government cat.) Could you undelete these categories, since CSD c1 shouldn't apply to useful but intentionally empty categories. Thanks, AJR | Talk 23:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

totally guided bot use

I'm using the bot only to disentangle messed-up interwiki links. All the actions made are totally guided. Should I quit it? --Puzzlet Chung 14:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as lots of work has been done of working through this list, mostly by me, I think it needs a re-run. Would you be able to do that in the next day or two. Thanks :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 15:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

message

fdsflsdj GeorgeMoney (talk) 02:47, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

stopped bot

Hi Eagle 101. I stopped your Gnome (Bot), but after re-reading my comment I was concerned about my tone. I think running a bot must be a pretty thankless job, as you often only hear from people that don't like what it's doing! It had edited a template that contained a red-cat, and caused some minor damage. I've restored the template and created the cat to avoid future problems. It's no big deal, but I was wondering if there has been discussion about editing templates, or if this was just a one-off because the template is still being developed (not often that a template would be left with a red-cat in it)? Cheers.--Bookandcoffee 16:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

correct there are few Templates that have red cats this is the first Ive seen and Ive been doing the samething. Betacommand (talkcontribsBot)WP:BAG16:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a prob...

Could you please hit unblock again and leave a message explaining what happened? (So it doesn't show up badly on my block log).

I was not sure if something was vandalism and reverted myself, that's why I used rollback. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 06:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate it! --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 06:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused

On the subject of old time radio - I've placed a link to our group - www.otterprojectonline.info several times and every time it is deleted. I don't understand why.

We have valuable information concerning old time radio. We have the internets largest database of otr logs which is updated weekly. We have many articles by leading members of the otr community as well as series synopisis and and the internets second largest collection of pdf files of otr scripts.

Can you give me some understanding as to why our link is deleted and commercial otr sites are permitted to 'advertise' on wikipedia, just because they have a few links to otr sources?

Jim BeshiresOTRR 16:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]