User talk:Quackslikeaduck: Difference between revisions

Welcome!

Hello Quackslikeaduck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --Nlu 04:11, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

DC election results

You seem to be the one who added most of the election history for DC politicians, so I thought I'd let you know that Gogo Dodo wants to delete that section from the Carol Schwartz article, saying it's too much data and doesn't add to it. I tend to agree that the election results clutter the articles, but I think they are valuable, especially when some of the articles haven't progressed to the point of covering all the elections. I'm wondering whether they should be handled differently, maybe even in separate election articles, and probably with tables. —KCinDC (talk) 02:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

More discussion here. —KCinDC (talk) 16:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for minding the Affordable Care Act article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks!

I appreciate very much the details you have added to Nevertheless, she persisted. Thanks for correcting the copy and making the account on the Senate floor more accurate—details matter, and your contributions make the article better. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For your team work on Nevertheless, she persisted. Bearian (talk) 00:31, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Willow, Wisconsin

Hey, it's probably the only time in the history of Willow, Wisconsin that it will ever get any national attention! --Orange Mike | Talk 21:20, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Agreed. Still not notable. ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 02:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Leif Garrett

Hello! I noticed your recent edit to Leif Garrett, and I wanted to ask you why you removed the references and text from the 2006 incident. I haven't gone and reverted it, I just wanted to ask why. ☶☲SouthernKangaroo☶☲ (☎) 13:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello! I didn't delete the text. I broke up a very long paragraph into several paragraphs and did some other minor revisions. If you look at the Difference Between Revisions [1], it will show that. ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 16:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Discord edit summary

While looking at the page history of Discord, I noticed your edit summary where you reference WP:MILLION. Just FYI, you're thinking of MOS:MILLION. Most style related things are prefixed by MOS, and if you're not already, try to check links you're putting in your edit summaries first :-). Thanks, ― Levi_OP^Talk 15:59, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct. I was thinking of MOS:MILLION. Thanks. ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 17:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Employee Retention Credit has been accepted

Employee Retention Credit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 00:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, Tutwakhamoe! ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 19:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Quackslikeaduck. Thank you for your work on Employee Retention Credit. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:28, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

@North8000: Thank you very much. ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 22:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Octopusflyingclublogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Octopusflyingclublogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

"TrumPAC" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect TrumPAC has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24 § TrumPAC until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)