User talk:Sakimonk: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 05:59, 16 February 2016

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Welcome to my talk page! For my archived talk page see: User talk:Sakimonk/Archive 1

August 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Islam. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Take it to the talk page. Drmies (talk) 05:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the article talk page to discuss your edit

Please could you use the article talk page to discuss your edit to the article on Wahhabism. In your edit summary you wrote that "Sunnah.org has been discredited as a reliable source a multitude of times". You might want to review your position on this edit (or even self-revert). See WP:SELFSOURCE.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Toddy1, that's seems reasonable, however I would really prefer if an alternative source were used. I'm planning on adding some reliable text on opposition using George Halverson's Political Sunni'ism if that's okay? In the mean time you can revert it if you want? It's up to you I don't mind either way. Sakimonk^talk 18:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That seems a good way ahead.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:42, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	May Allah guide your efforts! Mando Salama (talk) 05:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 -->
+== A barnstar for you! ==
+{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
+|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Civility Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]
+|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Civility Barnstar'''
+|-
+|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | May Allah guide your efforts! [[User:Mandosalama|Mando Salama]] ([[User talk:Mandosalama|talk]]) 05:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
+|}