User talk:Sjb72: Difference between revisions

Not to be confused with User:Stephen.

Here because I deleted your article? Read through this first to find out why.

If you do leave me a message I will generally respond here, unless you want me to reply elsewhere.

Nomination of Vladyslav Yakubovskyi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladyslav Yakubovskyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladyslav Yakubovskyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

• In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics and another wikirace on live TV

• News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law

• WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)

• Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users

• Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

• News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections

• Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?

• Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24

• In the media: Deadnames on the French Wikipedia, and a duel between Russian wikis

• Op-Ed: Wikidata to split as sheer volume of information overloads infrastructure

• Comix: Generations

• Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation publishes its Form 990 for fiscal year 2022-2023

• Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade

• Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor

• In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say

• News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024

• Opinion: Public response to the editors of Settler Colonial Studies

• Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth

• Featured content: We didn't start the wiki

• Essay: No queerphobia

• Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!

• Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer

• Comix: The Wikipediholic Family

• Humour: Wikipedia rattled by sophisticated cyberattack of schoolboy typing "balls" in infobox

• Concept: Palimpsestuous

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

AcademyTech

Hi @Sjb72, too busy to prevent the deletion of the page AcademyTech which you recently deleted, i would have rather preferred to request it be moved to draft to improve it and remove advertising materials/content on the page. I would request you please restore the page as a draft so i can work on it and improve it until it is ready to be published in the main space. Thank you Nuel Jr (talk) 13:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

I just realized you deleted two pages! Could you restore them both to draft space please? Thank you for your input. Nuel Jr (talk) 13:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

For reference; AcademyTech & Austere Systems Nuel Jr (talk) 13:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

I have reviewed both articles, and I do not believe either of them are suitable for Wikipedia, even if you did a complete rewrite to remove all the promotional material. I did not see any references, only links to press releases, YouTube videos; nothing made either topic notable. If I were to restore them, the articles would only be speedily deleted again.

As such, I will not be restoring them now, as it will be a waste of your time. However, I will restore them, provided you meet these conditions:

First, explain how you will write the articles so they do not read like advertising copy.

Second, for each article you wish me to restore, you need to show me three different references from reliable sources that demonstrate why the article meets the notability requirements.

Finally, you declare whether or not you have any paid connection with these organisations.

If you can meet these conditions, I will restore the articles.

Alternatively, if you'd rather someone else review these articles for deletion, you can take them to WP:DELREV. Stephen! ^Coming... 14:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

1. I believe the way to write both articles so they do not read like advertising copy is by me being neutral and removing all puffery or biased content. I do not have the write up currently as i started in my sandbox, but i doubt i took this into much note when writing the articles. I apologize for that. To amend, i will remove all that and be neutral in my perspective. Including adding these contents/links where the company Austere Ltd was mentioned https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/665a1f5f761b2b5bb626576d & this https://indiankanoon.org/doc/47155388/. In general, what i mean is i will take a neutral tone in my write up.
2. For Austere Ltd, i have https://www.thehindu.com/incoming/gurugram-admin-launches-online-encyclopaedia-on-districts-villages/article67562964.ece where the company is mentioned, the above earlier stated links, https://www.justdial.com/jdmart/Pune/Austere-Systems-Pvt-Ltd-Nigdi/020PXX20-XX20-170819133552-H2N6_BZDET/catalogue i believe. I have not really done a deep enough dive, which is why i requested they be restored as a draft and not article space. For AcademyTech, i have https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/teknoloji/cisco-advanced-services-egitimleri-artik-turkce-17815622, https://shiftdelete.net/academytechden-ccie-v40-r-s-kursu-15682, https://www.itnetwork.com.tr/360-derece-bilisim-uzmanligi-academyteche-ciscodan-inovasyon-odulu-getirdi/ among others which i believe i added in the articles late.
3. No i have not been paid for either article. I am a lawyer, and i came across Austere Ltd's case and looked more into it and decided to give it an article. I should have probably included the case as well. And for AcademyTech, i also came across one of its students, Yildiz, which led me to creating a page for both. I found other companies and i was going to make more.

Thank you Nuel Jr (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

I would honestly prefer if they could be restored as drafts. Not back to the main space. So i can have enough time improving them rather than being worried about speedy deletions because they are in the mainspace. Thank you. Nuel Jr (talk) 15:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)