User talk:Smith Jones: Difference between revisions
→"Thyme.com": new section |
Note |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
What type of source is [http://www.thyme.com/ this]? -- [[User:Consumed Crustacean|Consumed Crustacean]] <small>([[User talk:Consumed Crustacean|talk]])</small> 05:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC) |
What type of source is [http://www.thyme.com/ this]? -- [[User:Consumed Crustacean|Consumed Crustacean]] <small>([[User talk:Consumed Crustacean|talk]])</small> 05:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Neutral viewpoint== |
|||
Thanks for your contribution [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Neutral_viewpoint_needed here]. It's a shame that if you had a problem with my conduct you didn't say to me first as I did with the user in question. It wasn't my intention to "rat" anyone out I just wanted a neutral opinion. Difficult to get round here. [[User:Mallanox|<span style="background:white;color:black">Malla</span>]][[User talk:Mallanox|<span style="background:white;color:black">nox</span>]] 17:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:53, 25 June 2008
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
User talk:Smith Jones/My carhive <---ARCHIVE
Given the level of dysfunction that has come to prevail on Wikipedia, the most appropriate course for a principled scientist is to withdraw from the project.
The bureaucracy should either take corrective steps to fix this situation, or else suffer the eventual loss of huge amounts of valuable talent and volunteered resources.
If you agree with this statement, post it to your pages, and pass it on. (discuss this here)
"Biting" socks
care to weigh in here? I'm really curious as to what you saw as biting. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 00:34, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Your "stern opposition" at Talk:Unidentified flying object
Could you explain your opposition? I thought it was fairly well explained that a neutral administrator determined that several users were sockpuppets, and that these editors were banned as would happen to any sockpuppets. Also, can you explain why you changed the IP signature above your last statement. I will be reverting that, and was wondering why you would do this? LonelyBeacon (talk) 04:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Missed it
I requested information from you at Talk:Unidentified flying object , but you must have missed it in the current screeds being posted. Can you give a few examples of the "frontier scientific view" which you say is not adequately represented in the article? Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 01:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Editing editors comments
Please don't edit other editors comments, rather ask them to. I have clarified my edit. I intended both the (awful) pun and also an actual request for the source. Thanks. SesquipedalianVerbiage (talk) 18:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, no problem. It just altered the meaning slightly, and is always best to check first. A bit of light relief every now and then (although it can go too far!). I find FF3 with it's spell checker is great! SesquipedalianVerbiage (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
"2nd class editor"?
Nah, I don't think so. I think you just kinda got caught up in the moment of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Joseph Didier (2nd nomination). Been there, done that myself. I just think User:Presumptive still doesn't get the point that his standards and those of Wikipedia are not the same. I probably would be more forgiving if he hadn't tried to "game the system" in so many ways. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
"Thyme.com"
What type of source is this? -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Neutral viewpoint
Thanks for your contribution here. It's a shame that if you had a problem with my conduct you didn't say to me first as I did with the user in question. It wasn't my intention to "rat" anyone out I just wanted a neutral opinion. Difficult to get round here. Mallanox 17:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)