User talk:Subzzee: Difference between revisions

Hi, from your article, it seems there are 2 people bearing the same name, with very different dates. The infobox dates are different from the intro dates, and the dates in the text are also different from the intro.

Could you please review and correct it, according to your sources ? --Hsarrazin (talk on wd) 18:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot :) --Hsarrazin (talk on wd) 22:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Cashless Society) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Cashless Society, Subzzee!

Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I enjoyed reading the article you created on Cashless Society. Very well done.

To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Football manager history

I noticed you did some "manager history" work (example) and in case you do some more you might like to know that there is a new system. An example of changing a managers list for the new syntax is diff. Please see the documentation at {{Football manager history}}. Apart from the simplicity, the reason for the new syntax was that some articles were broken because the old system sometimes exceeded the maximum allowable number of templates, causing further templates to not be processed. Johnuniq (talk) 07:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see, let me read up on it and get up to speed, thank you for sharing this. (Subzzee (talk) 08:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC))[reply]

At my talk you asked how the existing navboxes will be changed. I don't think it's worth getting a bot because the effort of getting the code correct may be greater than the effort of doing the edits. However, please don't bother with that yourself because I'll get around to it ... eventually. Feel free to poke me if I get too distracted and forget. I made some editor macros that allow me to automate most of the editing steps and I use WP:WIKEDDIFF to do a final diff for checking. I converted about 50 of them. I only included the diff of one of my edits to show you the difference between the old and new syntax. Johnuniq (talk) 00:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:F-side logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:F-side logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:54, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Cape Verde Barnstar of National Merit
		For your contributions to Cape Verdean football and coverage of our national team. Obrigadu! Quehan ("Talk") 11:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Subzzee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017 at Women in Red

February 2017
	Black Women & Women Anthropologists online editathons Faciliated by Women in Red

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 08:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Subzzee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:André Tete concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:André Tete, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of AFC Ajax players (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to International football, Stefan Pettersson, Peter Larsson and Rob de Wit

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:André Tete

Hello, Subzzee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "André Tete".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Future Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Bull Salzburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Labyad

I have no personal feelings relating to this transfer. But as it is usually the case I would expect his Utrecht contract to run until 30 June and his Ajax contract to start on 1 July. And it is consensus at WP:Footy to update the storyline to mention that the transfer has been agreed but to reflect a player's current club per his contract, in this case Utrecht, in the infobox, in the lede, in the squad template, and so forth. Regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for repeatedly adding unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 07:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are special Snowman. Is the Sun too strong this Summer for the bleach blond hair? Did you even bother reading the reference that was added to Frits Purperharts page at the time of his death? Scroll down a bit, he passed away in Amsterdam with a memorial service held in Schiphol and his burial in Suriname. The information is already available in the source provided. You can stop acting like you own the place. I created the article Frits Purperhart btw, based off that fact alone, why do think I would vandalize an article I created myself? Also, regarding your big grumpy impulsive display following the edits made to Roger De Sa's page, he has not been a manager at Ajax CT for 2 years. This information is also already available in the references provided. You are quite impulsive with your ban hammer and I will report this silly display, young one. Talk to you soon (Subzzee (talk) 09:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Regarding Roger De Sá, you removed the template with no explanation. The article still states in the infobox that he is the manager, and he is still present in the very navigation template you removed.

Regarding Frits Purperhart, nowhere in the article does it mention him dying in Amsterdam.

You have a long history of adding unsourced to articles, particularly BLPs, and you never use edit summaries. You have been warned multiple times, and your behaviour has not changed. Add sources, use edit summaries, and this will not be a problem in the future. Giant Snowman 09:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.beri.nl/condoleance.php?nr=14995 You know so much about Suriname and Mr, Purperhart. I wrote everything there is to be found about him on Wikipedia. I might have known him for all you know, but don't trust my judgement. You wouldn't know who he is if I hadn't added some information about him on here. But suit yourself. You really put the <REDACTED> in your last name. Would love to run into you in <REDACTED> one day, so I can shake your hand. Take care. (Subzzee (talk) 11:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC))[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Subzzee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I work very hard, and spend a lot of my free time to write articles that shed light on areas on sports and culture for people's enjoyment. I have been working hard on this platform for a number of years now and simply don't deserve this level of disrespect. Snowman has repeatedly been incredibly disrespectful and shown that he obviously thinks manners are a waste of time. He also likes to threaten people from his authoritative position, and doesn't think it is necessary to be polite, or maybe address the situation otherwise before threatening (and then actually doing it) throwing someone in Wikipedia jail. There are people on here who are truly vandalizing articles and not simply trying to either upload entire articles (I have written around 400) and also looking to improve pages on what might have been left out of an article. I have dedicated a lot of time and energy in helping to improve the content on Wikipedia. Snowman has definite way of giving one the feeling that this is his house and he decides who gets to stay and who doesn't. There was a case a few years ago, where him and another user were hounding me across Wikipedia. I guess Snowman is back, and has not changed his ways much. I don't think my recent edit deserve a ban at all. I think this is overly excessive and his actions should be repealed. Regards, Subzzee (talk) 12:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I work very hard, and spend a lot of my free time to write articles that shed light on areas on sports and culture for people's enjoyment. I have been working hard on this platform for a number of years now and simply don't deserve this level of disrespect. Snowman has repeatedly been incredibly disrespectful and shown that he obviously thinks manners are a waste of time. He also likes to threaten people from his authoritative position, and doesn't think it is necessary to be polite, or maybe address the situation otherwise before threatening (and then actually doing it) throwing someone in Wikipedia jail. There are people on here who are truly vandalizing articles and not simply trying to either upload entire articles (I have written around 400) and also looking to improve pages on what might have been left out of an article. I have dedicated a lot of time and energy in helping to improve the content on Wikipedia. Snowman has definite way of giving one the feeling that this is his house and he decides who gets to stay and who doesn't. There was a case a few years ago, where him and another user were hounding me across Wikipedia. I guess Snowman is back, and has not changed his ways much. I don't think my recent edit deserve a ban at all. I think this is overly excessive and his actions should be repealed. Regards,  [[User:Subzzee|Subzzee]] ([[User talk:Subzzee#top|talk]]) 12:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I work very hard, and spend a lot of my free time to write articles that shed light on areas on sports and culture for people's enjoyment. I have been working hard on this platform for a number of years now and simply don't deserve this level of disrespect. Snowman has repeatedly been incredibly disrespectful and shown that he obviously thinks manners are a waste of time. He also likes to threaten people from his authoritative position, and doesn't think it is necessary to be polite, or maybe address the situation otherwise before threatening (and then actually doing it) throwing someone in Wikipedia jail. There are people on here who are truly vandalizing articles and not simply trying to either upload entire articles (I have written around 400) and also looking to improve pages on what might have been left out of an article. I have dedicated a lot of time and energy in helping to improve the content on Wikipedia. Snowman has definite way of giving one the feeling that this is his house and he decides who gets to stay and who doesn't. There was a case a few years ago, where him and another user were hounding me across Wikipedia. I guess Snowman is back, and has not changed his ways much. I don't think my recent edit deserve a ban at all. I think this is overly excessive and his actions should be repealed. Regards,  [[User:Subzzee|Subzzee]] ([[User talk:Subzzee#top|talk]]) 12:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I work very hard, and spend a lot of my free time to write articles that shed light on areas on sports and culture for people's enjoyment. I have been working hard on this platform for a number of years now and simply don't deserve this level of disrespect. Snowman has repeatedly been incredibly disrespectful and shown that he obviously thinks manners are a waste of time. He also likes to threaten people from his authoritative position, and doesn't think it is necessary to be polite, or maybe address the situation otherwise before threatening (and then actually doing it) throwing someone in Wikipedia jail. There are people on here who are truly vandalizing articles and not simply trying to either upload entire articles (I have written around 400) and also looking to improve pages on what might have been left out of an article. I have dedicated a lot of time and energy in helping to improve the content on Wikipedia. Snowman has definite way of giving one the feeling that this is his house and he decides who gets to stay and who doesn't. There was a case a few years ago, where him and another user were hounding me across Wikipedia. I guess Snowman is back, and has not changed his ways much. I don't think my recent edit deserve a ban at all. I think this is overly excessive and his actions should be repealed. Regards,  [[User:Subzzee|Subzzee]] ([[User talk:Subzzee#top|talk]]) 12:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Giant Snowman 11:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 172: / Line 172: @@
 http://www.beri.nl/condoleance.php?nr=14995
 You know so much about Suriname and Mr, Purperhart. I wrote everything there is to be found about him on Wikipedia. I might have known him for all you know, but don't trust my judgement. You wouldn't know who he is if I hadn't added some information about him on here. But suit yourself. You really put the <REDACTED> in your last name. Would love to run into you in <REDACTED> one day, so I can shake your hand. Take care. ([[User:Subzzee|Subzzee]] ([[User talk:Subzzee#top|talk]]) 11:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC))
+{{unblock|reason=I work very hard, and spend a lot of my free time to write articles that shed light on areas on sports and culture for people's enjoyment. I have been working hard on this platform for a number of years now and simply don't deserve this level of disrespect. Snowman has repeatedly been incredibly disrespectful and shown that he obviously thinks manners are a waste of time. He also likes to threaten people from his authoritative position, and doesn't think it is necessary to be polite, or maybe address the situation otherwise before threatening (and then actually doing it) throwing someone in Wikipedia jail. There are people on here who are truly vandalizing articles and not simply trying to either upload entire articles (I have written around 400) and also looking to improve pages on what might have been left out of an article. I have dedicated a lot of time and energy in helping to improve the content on Wikipedia. Snowman has definite way of giving one the feeling that this is his house and he decides who gets to stay and who doesn't. There was a case a few years ago, where him and another user were hounding me across Wikipedia. I guess Snowman is back, and has not changed his ways much. I don't think my recent edit deserve a ban at all. I think this is overly excessive and his actions should be repealed. Regards,  [[User:Subzzee|Subzzee]] ([[User talk:Subzzee#top|talk]]) 12:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)}}
 == ANI notification ==