User talk:ThinkEnemies: Difference between revisions

Archives (Index)

2010/May 2010/June 2010/July 2010/September 2010/October 2010/November 2011/February 2011/March 2011/April 2011/June 2011/October 2011/November 2011/December 2012/February 2013/April 2013/May 2013/June 2013/July 2013/August

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

ThinkEnemies is derived from a CAPTCHA encountered while registering to edit Wikipedia. There is no deep, profound meaning. Unfortunately, ThinkEnemies has no meaning at all. If defined based on contributions, ThinkEnemies would be synonymous with truth.

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement closed

An arbitration case, in which you were named as party, has now closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

Pages related to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed, are placed under discretionary sanctions. This sanction supersedes the existing community sanctions.

The current community sanctions are lifted.

Goethean (talk · contribs), North8000 (talk · contribs), Malke 2010 (talk · contribs), Xenophrenic (talk · contribs), Arthur Rubin (talk · contribs), Ubikwit (talk · contribs), Phoenix and Winslow (talk · contribs) are indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee after no less than six months have passed from the closing of this case.

Collect (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This topic ban will expire after six months from the date this case is closed on.

Xenophrenic (talk · contribs) is indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, Collect (talk · contribs) anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions).

Snowded (talk · contribs) and Phoenix and Winslow (talk · contribs) are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, each other anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions).

For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Are you still editing?

You seem to be one of the few who dodged the big ban hammer in the ArbCom proceeding. Agenda of the Tea Party movement has been nominated for deletion. I think they may be gaming the system since the RFC was just closed with a "keep" consensus. If you have anything to add to the deletion discussion, please do. GoodeOldeboy (talk) 20:20, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Your recent editing history at RealClearPolitics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. I will give you an opportunity to self-revert before I report this. Dave Dial (talk) 20:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

User:ThinkEnemies reported by User:DD2K (Result: 24 hours & page protected)

Page

RealClearPolitics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

ThinkEnemies (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 18:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC) "clear OR/SYN, as cannot be verified by cited source"
2. 20:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC) "Undid revision 572392612 by Goethean (talk)I'm so sorry but your world view cant fix the fact your data doesn't support your retarded ass interpretation of cited refs"
3. 20:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC) "Undid revision 572394899 by DD2K (talk)consensus nononononononononono maybe you meant constupid"
4. 20:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC) "Undid revision 572395531 by DD2K (talk) I'm ready to accept how certain people blame human events for their nuttiness."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 20:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on RealClearPolitics. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Not only is the editor clearly edit warring, his comments(both in edit summaries and on the Talk page) are personal attacks. [I'll stay on the talk page unfortunately little girls outs wants war https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:RealClearPolitics&diff=prev&oldid=572396263] [I'm so sorry but your world view cant fix the fact your data doesn't support your retarded ass interpretation of cited refs https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RealClearPolitics&diff=prev&oldid=572394631]. Plus 2 more. Dave Dial (talk) 20:47, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours for a specific violation of 3RR, and Page protected for 4 days to prevent further edit warring from other users. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 21:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

The blocking admin will explain: Not only is the editor clearly edit warring, his comments(both in edit summaries and on the Talk page) are personal attacks.