User talk:VegetarianSatvic: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:06, 15 January 2017

January 2017

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one or more of your recent contributions to Sattvic diet because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Non-Dropframe _talk 00:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VegetarianSatvic, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi VegetarianSatvic! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Marvellous Spider-Man 16:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chinna Jeeyar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO I FIXED THE CITATION PLEASE STOP CHANGING IT I WORKED SO HARD ON IT I WILL PROMISE TO CITE IT FROM NOW ON

Hello, VegetarianSatvic. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Chinna Jeeyar ‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 21:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Chinna Jeeyar has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Chinna Jeeyar, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove independent sources and replace them with sources exclusively citing the subject's website. —C.Fred (talk) 22:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note the next time you attempt to turn the encyclopedia article into a fan page I will block you from editing. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 22:04, 15 January 2017 edit NeilN (talk \| contribs) 134,455 edits Warning: Edit warring. (TW) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:06, 15 January 2017 edit undo NeilN (talk \| contribs) 134,455 edits →January 2017 Next edit →
Line 48:		Line 48:

	If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule\|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:NeilN\|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN\|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 22:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)		If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule\|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:NeilN\|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN\|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 22:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

			Note the next time you attempt to turn the '''encyclopedia''' article into a fan page I will block you from editing. --[[User:NeilN\|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN\|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 22:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)