User talk:We stand for editing

Welcome!

Hello, We stand for editing! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Končulj Agreement (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Urban Versis 32 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Končulj Agreement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 23:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, We stand for editing! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk / contribs) 23:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Končulj Agreement has been accepted

Končulj Agreement, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations on this article, and I also do recommend the use of AfC for new users for quite some time. There's nothing wrong with that, and may garner more support from other editors on such complex and obscure topics. — Smuckola(talk) 02:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Multiple accounts

I would like to point your attention to Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry, the policy of using multiple accounts. There are strong reasons to suspect that you're the same person as Overthrow-dictator (talk · contribs). While, per policy, using multiple accounts may be permitted in some circumstances, this is not the one: those two operate on the same set of articles, in the same manner. I acknowledge you weren't using this account while Overthrow-dictator was blocked, since WP:EVASION is strictly forbidden. However, if you continue such use, you may easily be subjected to further sanctions.

While I do not always agree with your edits, I wish you no ill, and please take this as a friendly reminder. Please stick to one of those accounts and just abandon the other. Thank you. No such user (talk) 12:08, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

We stand for editing must stop messing around and answer this right now. No such user, because you're familiar, could you go file a report at WP:SPI? I see what you're saying. The first account stopped editing on November 28 and this account started the same pattern on November 30, and won't answer you. — Smuckola(talk) 04:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

I could stop entirely if you want me too. It is true that this account is owned by @Overthrow-dictator. I recently found this accounts password and forgot the other ones. I wish both of you guys no ill. We stand for editing (talk) 11:40, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

The reason why I haven't responded is because I have switched to other games other than Wikipedia. We stand for editing (talk) 11:42, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Oh okay, we were just checking, because WP:SOCK is super duper serious policy, so never mind about that. But WP:MULTIPLE has the procedure for you to label the accounts as multiples and shutting one down, because Wikipedia does not support deletion of accounts. Creating a new account just instead of clicking on the password recovery procedure is not a valid reason. Ok thanks.

By the way, I see that you have a ton of advanced skills, like using wikicode for formatting citation metadata and infoboxes, and proper use of sandboxing and drafting. Wow. Even for just those skills alone, I wish you could tutor half the userbase on that. I'd sure like your articles to be more thoroughly covered and sourced so please don't abandon them, and please don't create any perma-stubs on ultra-niche subjects like 1994 Republic of Serbian Krajina presidential election because that is still spammy! I hope you're not creating permanent stub or start level that aren't fully WP:N. You have created some subjects of world news with broad coverage. If these articles are in fact WP:N as standalone subjects, then you're covering some very complicated subjects and with rich formatting, which would be most impressive. — Smuckola(talk) 02:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Remember the Siege of Žepa article, owned by @Overthrow-dictator? If you take a look at the history of that article, you will find the article (or should I say draft) was very small. After a few months the article grew very large, with more and more citations being thrown. Same with my Končulj Agreement article. It only had 1 citation before it grew in size with 10 citations. Oh, and btw, I abandon articles ONLY IF THEY ARE NOT WRITTEN GOOD. Sincerely, We stand for editing (talk) 11:54, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Good job but if they weren't at least C class (stub or start), and weren't written well, then that's called a draft and so they should have never left the Draft space or they should have been a part of an existing article. They should be well written and with at least 3 WP:RS which have substantially broad coverage in the source, to be a standalone article or published in Main space. The only exception would be for the gazzeteer (mapping) function of Wikipedia, which is for cities, rivers, highways, and historical register sites. Those can be published as stub or start class. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 23:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

And then, some days after I posted that, you bypassed AfC and created another perma-stub Vitez massacre (1993) which obviously belongs in Croat–Bosniak War. That's just a waste of everybody's time. — Smuckola(talk) 06:35, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Serbian Autonomous Oblast of Krajina (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Serbian Autonomous Oblast of Krajina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Serbian Autonomous Oblast of Krajina

Hello, We stand for editing. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Serbian Autonomous Oblast of Krajina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)