User talk:WikiDan61: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:48, 28 May 2010

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|WikiDan61}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Please post all new discussions at the END of the page, to allow for easier chronological tracking! Thank you! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the template ...

~~Proposed deletion of Charter College of Health and Massage Therapy~~

~~The article Charter College of Health and Massage Therapy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:~~
~~School of uncertain notability; spam was deleted but it still has many issues, including zero references.~~
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 23:32, 13 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

I didn't create the page. I nominated it for speedy deletion. No need to prod warn me. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Salpeter

The AFD tag that you added to Bob Salpeter is not linking to the AFD discussion page that you have started. I dont know how to correct the issue, but thought I should let you know. Active Banana (talk) 16:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I often find that Twinkle creates redlinked AFD banners, but when I click on the red link, it brings me to the correct AFD page. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Çorum

that refrences are reliable , the problem is that the isbn numbers are belongs to the other system.They are all related with Turkish history.Some of the resources was also in 1980 Turkish coup d'état. You shouldn't delete it because it is important subjects for history of Turkish Political life and the informations are true...thank you for your time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arizayim (talk • contribs) 21:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive

Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 00:16, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making vandalism

In the articles it is clearly written that bald men have lower testosterone levels and thay are more likely easily have diabetes, say me EXCATLY what is NOT present in the articles?--250GP (talk) 13:18, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now I've changed something in the article, now it is excaltly like the articles--250GP (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actin remodeling

Hey, I noticed you nominated Actin remodeling for speedy. A brand new user, User:Cvs6 removed the speedy template (and has made no edits since). I'm not entirely sure just what's going on there but I thought I would let you know if you wanted to take it to AfD or if you wanted to look into the possibility that the new user is a sockpuppet. --Non-Dropframe _talk 22:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Port of Rotterdam

Yesterday i created a new page with corporate content of the Port of Rotterdam Authority. Thats a totally different approach then the artcile 'Port of Rotterdam'. All my effort is gone and I kindly ask you to put it back please. If you look at the content it's not the same. I know it because I work at the Authority. You have said also that the article is merged with Port of Rotterdam article, but I dont see the content I created. Please explain! --Ketelbinkie 07:37, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

The content isn't gone -- it's still there in the page's history. You are free to revert my change. However, you should understand that, other than the factual content that the Port of Rotterdam Authority is a joint venture of the Municipality of Rotterdam and the Dutch State (a fact that I did merge into the Port of Rotterdam article), the rest of your article was highly promotional in tone. And since you admit that you work the Authority, you have a conflict of interest and should be careful to avoid any such promotion. Rather than recreate the Authority page, I suggest you edit the Port of Rotterdam page to add any non-promotional content you feel is necessary. Wikipedia tries to keep only one article on any single topic, so that all editors may concentrate on improving the single article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:59, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Random comment

heyyy wyd? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samantha1011 (talk • contribs)

Sorry -- Wikipedia is not a chat site or social networking site. If you'd like to help build an encyclopedia, please do. If you'd like to chat, please try MySpace, Facebook, AIM, or Yahoo! Messenger.

hey by the way so like i really cant really txt you on myspace unless your account is not private. is it private? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samantha1011 (talk • contribs)

I do not wish to chat with you. I'm trying to work on improving an encyclopedia. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moutray

you are either : a. a joker b. autistic

i thought wiki , said " dont be a dick !!!@

1. i had only started to create the page 30 mins ago . 2. you have already tried to delete it , for @ providing no context@!!!.

1. give me a chance 2. there is a context ... its related to the book written by raineval , a genealogist . hence the fact that i was linking from it

also , : who the F*@king hell , made you the arbitrater ... this is a voluntary endevaour . so BUTT OUT !

i am sick of you officious assholes, who try to delete entries .

i will start to erase every entry you make , and see how you like it .

IMBECILE!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moutray2010 (talk • contribs)

Your article is a mess; it is impossible to tell from the text you have created what it is you are trying to write about. It's not clear if you are writing about a book, or a family, or a place or what. Since Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, article that do not provide enough context about their subject to help other editors collaborate are meaningless and pointless. If you would like time to clean up the article, you should do so in your own user space. Reading through your user talk page, I see that this suggestion has been made to you in the past. Please follow that suggestion. Further, if you continue to make threatening remarks on my or other users' talk pages, you will be reported to Wikipedia administration, and likely have your editing privileges suspended. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:28, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. if you dont want threatening remarks, dont provoke me , you smart arse gobshite . - if you dont have the intelligence to give someone a chance to make an entry , dont expect me to waste my time discussing with you . i am on a learning curve , trying to learn how to use this system , and every time i submit an entry , wasting my time and effort , some moron prick , puts it for speedy deletion.

its up to me , how , i submit my article , you are abusing your position . honestly , if i am gognt o start deleting everything you submit , then see what your response is . it is totally ridiculous, and the fact taht i even have to spell this out , to make you aware of this , makes it apparent the type of austic cretin i am dealing with . back off . give people a chance you f$@king NAZI!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moutray2010 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. you should give people more than a few seconds, before attempting to interfer and asking for a delete.

2. you have stillnot explained to me, what your justification was .. ie not notable . who are you to make that decision ?

you are using/ abusing the position , to use it in a frivioulous manner, adn am going to petition taht you are removed from editing priviledges , .

you are a negative influence here. !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moutray2010 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

ToxicWasteGrounds would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact ToxicWasteGrounds to accept or decline the nomination. A page will then be created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/WikiDan61. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

I undid the transclusion of this RfA, as it appears you haven't accepted any nomination or indeed made any comment whatsoever about it. It seemed supremely premature to launch an RfA without the knowledge of the candidate. If I am in error, please reverse my action - however, I strongly recommend more involvement on your part, such as answering Q1-3 and officially accepting the nomination. Tan | 39 16:07, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More Moutray

i dont know why i am wasting my time on this .

1. it is a charity , 2. it is voluntary .

eg i have added additional information re Seafield Tower , since (a.my Family Owned it b. its now a pile of rubble , so there is only one sentence , saying " it was abandoned in 1733" c. i had thougth , that i would be helpful and add a bit of additional information such as , yes , it is a pile of rubble , however teh significatnce , of it was , that it was part of the Moutray holdings , it was sold in 1618 , when they then moved to roscobie , and then was sold by archibishop law to melville . who then abandoned it .

i am interested in how/ when it was destroyed, as many people who walk past it with their dogs, may be, along the coastal path .

other than that , other family members, may be interested in it , hence, the reason i added the information .

you , however, have removed, the information i have put up , so that all it says is " it was abandoned in 1733:

how is that : a . helpful? b. constructive ?

i believe you are simply a deletionist , and am getting very worn out , and frustrated dealing with you .

if the world consisted of people like you where would we be , as you are not adding anything , but simply removing things, even after 5 mins , before giving anyone else the chance, to decide,

what do you propose about this , as i feel you are quote vexatious , and am going to have to get advice on how to deal with your behaviour . it is wasting my precious time , and yes i am adding relevant parts of my family history , as that is of historical , record, in teh national archives of scotland , england , ireland , and the national archives in washington , so i will continue to include the relevant informaiotn and who are you to stop me , —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moutray2010 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the information you are adding is "part of the historical record", then please provide reliable sources for such information. The fact that "other family members" may be interested in your information does not make it notable. If you would like to publish information for your family members to read, you are free to launch your own family blog. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and tries to maintain certain standards. You have stated several times that you are new and trying to learn how things work here. I suggest that you begin by reading "Your first article", followed by "The Five Pillars". These will give you some valuable insight into what information is needed (and, perhaps more to the point, what information is not needed) to make an encyclopedia article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Franek deletion

Hey, there is evidence the actor played in those films. I'm going to link the films to other Wiki articles, would that be good for you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Safotsa (talk • contribs) 19:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you can provide evidence that the films themselves are notable, that will be helpful. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thankyou for your feedback on my zahia dehar page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kals1234 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haywards Heath

Sub-heading = the Broadway Group:(currently in history) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Charlesdrakew

I'm writng to you for two reasons: Firstly an item posted as headed above was deleted by Charlesdrakew yesterday without feedback. I find it difficult to understand the wiki hierarchy, possibly due to the limititations I have regarding some concepts as as Asperger. You helped last year to agree/straighten out the entry for the Haywards Heath Referendum Group which drake has also now deleted, and I've really worked hard to ensure that the entry for the Broadway Group is neutral/factual/relevant so basically is it me being unreasonable or have I simply run into a self appointed guardian of Sussex entries who will only approve his own entries? Is drakecharlew legit and if not, how do I complain formally to stop his behaviour? Any help you can provide really would be appreciated. Many thanks in advance.--Jivebaby 16:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jivebaby (talk • contribs)

First of all, one does not sign content on articles. Signatures are encouraged on talk page posts, but not on content added to actual articles. Secondly, one does not engage in discussions of article content within the article itself, as you did here. Such discussions are to take place on article talk pages. When Charlesdrakew (talk · contribs) reverted your additions about the Broadway Residents' Group, you should have engaged in a discussion at Talk:Haywards Heath rather than simply revert his edit. In this case, I'm inclined to agree with Charles that the Broadway Residents' Group is not a group worthy of encyclopedic note. They appear to be little more than a group of concerned citizens trying to get their local council's attention. Since they have received no press (at least no reliable sources were provided), the information you have provided is unverifiable, and thus not appropriate for Wikipedia. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

National Insurance Timor Leste

Thank you for the note! — e. ripley\^talk 13:40, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Errigal-Trough

Nice pruning of the Errigal-Trough article. I've changed it slightly to cite Lewis in standard ref format, and I've italicized the quote - hope you agree -- Boing! said Zebedee 13:55, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely done. I should have been neater but was in something of a rush. (Life intrudes!) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A11 and A12

There are two proposed CSD reasons being discussed. I hope you will join. Some of these articles are clear nonsense and we really need some reasons to cover them. — Timneu22 · talk 16:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment re:Saad Wasiuddin

Just to let you know, I commented here. Parsecboy (talk) 13:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And again. Parsecboy (talk) 17:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

reply2

Hello, WikiDan61. You have new messages at Sophie's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Marie Warder

I should have been more careful. In my haste to respond, I wrote in the wrong tense. I used'Bold text' to be her publicist. Now, having had three members of my family die of Hemochtomatosis (undiagnosed until too late) I support all her efforts in any way I can. Like Nancy Steinbeck I have become her unofficial PRO. I don't consider that a conflict of interest. I believe that she did indeed "make the world aware of HHC."

Murella (talk) 18:34, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of info and careless reading seems to be contributing to the proposed deletion of TOM WARDER

Inventions: If I had been permitted to post images of the Newsweek and Sunday Express articles, it would have been clear that the names of Tom and Selby Warder were included in the article. Then, about the article concerning the Incubator --- the point is that he saw possibilities in scrap iron - a strong character trait - and accompanied the sick kids during their flights.

Music Did your other critic notice that Tom Warder had a very popular and successful dance-band after the war? I can send him a link sothat he can hear it for himself.

Venturian 06:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Venturian (talk • contribs)

Regarding the bottle cap opener, there was a direct quote from the Newsweek article, and it did not mention the brothers' names. The fact that you have now changed the text of the quote tells me that either the information was misquoted before, or it is misquoted now. Since I do not have access to a 1963 South Africa version of Newsweek, I had to rely on the quote provided. Regarding the incubator -- I do not argue that Mr Warder was a clever and compassionate man. That is laudable. But it is not notable, and notability and verifiability are the keys to inclusion of articles on Wikipedia. As for Mr Warder's musical career, some links verifying that would be very nice. And please, not links to blogs, or to record producers sites, or to personal reminiscences, but links (or even unlinked citations) to articles in independent reliable sources that verify that, not only did Mr. Warder have a musical career, but that it was significant. Phrases such as "considered one of the finest swing mandolin players of his time" require citations for verification. Since a search for "Tom Warder" and "swing mandolin" shows only self-published sources, I can't provide the needed reference, so you, as the author who made the claim, must. Finally, I should note that Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs) has insisted on using your first name in discussions on Talk:Tom Warder, leading me to assume that you are, in fact, his widow. While I admire your devotion to your husband, Wikipedia is not a place to memorialize our loved ones. It is an encyclopedia, and the information it contains needs to be factual, neutral and verifiable. If you feel the need to post a memorial to your husband, there are any number of web hosts (many free) that will suit your needs. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse Me?

Vandalism???? I know what exactly going on here! Xeysx (talk) 08:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. Twinkle gives me two options to back a change -- Rollback Vandalism and Rollback AGF (Assume Good Faith). I should have assumed good faith. However, I did not issue a vandalism warning on your talk page, I merely informed you of the mistake you had made. So, what, praytell, do you think is going on here? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have formally requested a page move. That is really the best way to go. I am not familiar enough with Indonesian football to weigh in on whether the move is proper or not, but I hope that those who are will weigh in on the subject. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

help

Hello, WikiDan61. You have new messages at Karabels's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

i dont get it. what's wrong with the entry that i made? about the discography, i understand. but what's wrong with the links?

@@ Line 196: / Line 196: @@
 : My apologies.  [[WP:Twinkle|Twinkle]] gives me two options to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arema_Malang&action=historysubmit&diff=364286592&oldid=364285711roll back] a change -- Rollback Vandalism and Rollback AGF (Assume Good Faith).  I should have [[WP:AGF|assumed good faith]].  However, I did not issue a vandalism warning on your [[User talk:Xeysx|talk page]], I merely informed you of the mistake you had made.  So, what, praytell, do you think is going on here? <font color="green">[[User:WikiDan61|WikiDan61]]</font><font color="green" size="5px"></font><sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 11:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 :: I see that you have formally requested a page move.  That is really the best way to go.  I am not familiar enough with Indonesian football to weigh in on whether the move is proper or not, but I hope that those who are will weigh in on the subject. <font color="green">[[User:WikiDan61|WikiDan61]]</font><font color="green" size="5px"></font><sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 12:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
+== help ==
+{{Talkback|karabels}}
+i dont get it. what's wrong with the entry that i made?
+about the discography, i understand. but what's wrong with the links?