User talk:ZlatanSweden10: Difference between revisions

Minor edit

Hello - a polite reminder to only tick the minor edit box when your edits have made a a superficial difference - edits you've recently marked as minor have not been so. "A good rule of thumb is that edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of the content should be flagged as minor edits"

Best wishes, Turini2 (talk) 06:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks! ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

My edit request, please?

Can you please add these following ideologies to the Freedom Party of Austria's infobox? Here is the following:

Anti-Immigration

Social conservatism

Welfare Chauvinism

A great please and thank you from 97.97.98.76 (talk) 01:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Not necessary. Those ideologies are already covered in the infobox indirectly by the existing ideologies.

Social conservatism is part of the overall national conservatism ideology

And right-wing populists advocate for welfare chauvinism and stricter immigration laws.

Infoboxes are meant to be simple, quick and easy to read. ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 01:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

If you want to add a source, add it under the ideology/policies section of that particular party's page. Not in the infobox. Hope you understand. ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 01:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

If you want an example of a before and after, look at the Sweden Democrats page on 21 May 2023 and 26 May 2023. It was agreed upon to condense it. ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 01:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Okay, but social conservatism is different from national one. Look at Swiss People's Party, it had both national conservatism & social conservatism and anti-immigration & right-wing populism on its infobox. Should we add welfare chauvinism to Swiss People's Party?

Also, does European Conservatives & Reformists have some parties that are Hard on Euroscepticism? Just calmly reminding you, wishes from 97.97.98.76 (talk) 01:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

No, majority of the parties in ECR are either soft-Eurosceptic or just normal Eurosceptic (the ECR supports EU reform, not leaving the EU like the ID Group - even most ID parties now don't support leaving the EU since Brexit has made it so unpopular now)

Also I'm aware that the Swiss People's Party has a long infobox. There are plans in the talk page to reduce it and I plan to join in the convo to reduce it. The discussions do take time but they always eventually lead up to a smaller infobox for easier reading (look how long this discussion took: Talk:Democratic Party of Korea just to agree on the ideology list lol).

National Rally for example used to have an infobox just as long as the Swiss People's Party one but now its just 2 ideologies with a footnote (same with Alternative for Germany). We don't want pages like Alliance for the Union of Romanians or Conservative People's Party of Estonia lol ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 23:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

You know what? Yeah, I agree now! Can I have your opinion - if Freedom Caucus (Trumpist Republican) was an European party, would it be a member of Identity and Democratic Party or European Conservatives and Reformist? Still, I understand why we want the info box simple, you don’t want random people going into your space just to advertise and make you buy stuffs. 97.97.98.76 (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Well the GOP is officially a global partner of the ECR. But imo the Trumpist faction would be more part of ID more than ECR (ECR has moderate factions as well like the Freedom and Solidarity and Civic Democratic Party). Maybe some Freedom Caucus members would be part of the Alliance for Peace and Freedom lol ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 00:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Make sense for Freedom Caucus to be Identity & Democratic Party as it is more nationalist, right-wing populist and more social conservative than ECR. Well, if it is nationalist and right-wing populist then why is Brothers of Italy in ECR rather than ID. 97.97.98.76 (talk) 00:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)