[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles written by a single editor: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Undid revision 341007208 by 99.204.100.102 (talk)
Hiabc (talk | contribs)
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{shortcut|WP:ASE|WP:AWSE|WP:AWBASE}}
{{shortcut|WP:ASE|WP:AWSE|WP:AWBASE}}
'''Articles written by a single editor''' have a higher probability of needing attention than those which have received contributions from several editors. So, we generate a list of articles that have been written by an inexperienced editor and have not yet received any collaboration.


Some of the articles are good, but others need to be fixed or flagged appropriately, so that the topic experts can enhance them. When reviewing an article, the underlying idea is: Fix what you can fix and [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup|tag]] the rest, so that more experienced editors can find and fix them.
'''Articles written by a single editor''' have a higher probability of needing attention than those which have received contributions from several editors. So, we have generated a list of all articles that have been written by an inexperienced editor and have not yet received any collaboration.


Helping is easy, fast and even entertaining, if you are curious. First open the <u>'''<big>[[Wikipedia:Articles written by a single editor/Articles list|Articles list]]</big>'''</u> in a new window, and begin reviewing the articles. When you're done, delete the article(s) from the articles list. Feedback is always welcome on the [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|talk page]].
Some of the articles are good, but others need to be fixed or flagged appropriately, so that the topic experts can enhance them. When reviewing an article, the underlying idea is: Fix what you can fix and tag the rest, so that more experienced editors can find and fix them.

Helping is easy, fast and even entertaining, if you are curious. First open the <u><b><big>[[Wikipedia:Articles written by a single editor/Articles list/B|Articles list]]</big></b></u> in a new window, and begin reviewing the articles. When you're done, delete the article or articles from the articles list. Feedback is always welcome on the [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|talk page]].


==How to review an article==
==How to review an article==
{{MiniAWFP}}
For each article, check all of the following things:
For each article, check all of the following things:
* If the article contains insults, random characters, such as "dkhgdsklhskl" or any other nonsense, then revert the problems or delete the nonsense. If there are no good revisions to revert back to, then nominate for speedy deletion.
* If the article appears to be a blatant advertisement, then place '''{{tl|advert}}''', or if it's irredeemable, add '''{{tl|db-g11}}''' at the top of the article.
* If the article does not have enough wikilinks, then place '''{{tl|dead end}}''', for no links or '''{{tl|underlinked}}''', for few links at the top of the article.
* If the article is about something that might not be notable enough, then place '''{{tl|notability}}''' at the top of the article.
* If you feel the article needs a topic expert's attention, then place '''{{tl|expert-subject}}''' at the top of the article.
* In any other cases of problematic content, place '''{{tl|cleanup}}''', and '''explain the problems''' in the tag or on the talk page, at the top of the article.
Please also check:
* '''Stubs:''' If the article is very short, perhaps only a few sentences and needs to be developed, then it is a [[wp:stub|stub]]. If the article is not yet tagged as a stub, then place '''{{tl|stub}}''' at the bottom of the article.
* '''First sentence:''' The first sentence of the article must introduce the context. For instance, the Jazz article's first sentence must at least explain that Jazz is a kind of music, with a wikilink to the Music article. If it does not, please fix it. If fixing it is too difficult, place '''{{tl|lead rewrite}}''' at the top of the article.
* '''Sources:''' If the article does not cite any [[Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Adding_the_citation|sources or references]] for facts that are likely to be challenged, then paste '''{{tl|unreferenced}}''' at the top of the article. If it has some sources, but you think it needs more, place '''{{tl|citations missing}}''' at the top of the article. If there are sources, open them and check that the content of the article matches.


==What to do if the list is empty==
===Problematic content===
# Take note of the "magic number" which can be found at the bottom of the [[Wikipedia:Articles written by a single editor/Articles list|articles list]] (for instance: 1050).
* If the article contains insults, random characters, such as "dkhgdsklhskl" or any other nonsense, then delete those items. If this is too difficult to do quickly, then place '''{{tl|nonsense}}''' at the top of the article and go back to the article later.
# Go to https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/48504
* If the article appears to be a blatant advertisement, then place '''{{tl|advert}}''' at the top of the article.
# Log in (you can use your Wikimedia account).
* If the article has typos, formatting issues or no wikilinks, then place '''{{tl|wikify}}''' at the top of the article.
# Press "Fork".
* If you feel the article needs a topic expert's attention, then place '''{{tl|expert}}''' at the top of the article.
# At the first line of the script (which starts with "SET @MAGIC"), replace the number with the one you got in step 1.
* In any other cases of problematic content, place '''{{tl|cleanup}}''' at the top of the article.
# Press "Submit Query".

# Wait until the query completes, it can take up to 30 minutes.
===Short articles===
# A list of page titles appears at the bottom. Press "Download" and "TSV".
====Stubs====
# Open the TSV file with any text editor.
If the article is very short, perhaps only a few sentences and needs to be developed, then it is a [[wp:stub|stub]]. If the article is not yet tagged as a stub, then place '''{{tl|stub}}''' at the bottom of the article, below the categories. Using a topic-specific stub, such as '''{{tl|astronomy-stub}}''', is preferred. One can look for the article's topic in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/List_of_stubs|list of stubs]].
# Copy the content to the [[Wikipedia:Articles written by a single editor/Articles list|articles list]] (just the line after "List:").

# Increment the magic number by 50, for instance if it was 1050 replace it with 1100, and save.
====Definitions====
If the article is little more than a word definition, you may use a '''<nowiki>{{subst:prod|reason}}</nowiki>''' tag (proposed deletion) with "WP is not a dictionary" substituting for the word "reason".

====Chemistry====
Short articles on chemicals may be prefixed with '''{{tl|chemical-importance}}''' to flag them for [[WP:Wikiproject Chemistry]].

===Category===
If the article does not have a category, please add one from the [[Portal:Contents/Categorical_index|list of categories]]. This way, experts that specialize in the category's topic can find the article and enhance it. To add a category, place '''<nowiki>[[Category:topic goes here]]</nowiki>''' at the bottom of the article, above any ''stub'' templates. If you have no idea which category fits, just paste '''{{tl|uncategorized}}''' at the top, then a more experienced editor can find the right category for the article.

===First sentence===
The first sentence of the article must introduce the context. For instance, the Jazz article's first sentence must at least explain that Jazz is a kind of music, with a wikilink to the Music article. If it does not, please fix it. If fixing it is too difficult, place '''{{tl|intro-rewrite}}''' at the top of the article.

===Sources===
If the article does not cite any [[Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Adding_the_citation|sources or references]] for facts that are likely to be challenged, then paste '''{{tl|unreferenced}}''' at the top of the article. If it has some sources, but you think it needs more, place '''{{tl|citations missing}}''' at the top of the article.


If anything does not work as expected, please detail the problem on [[User_talk:Syced|my talk page]], thanks!
===Expert attention===
You may ask for expert attention by using a tag similar to '''<nowiki>{{Expert-subject|software|date=April 2009}}</nowiki>''' at the top. (You can omit the date.)


==Userbox==
==Userbox==
Line 50: Line 46:
* If you would like an article to be checked, simply add it to any section of the articles list.
* If you would like an article to be checked, simply add it to any section of the articles list.
* Some of the listed articles may already have more than one author, because the list is not updated that often. It does not matter, just check them like the others.
* Some of the listed articles may already have more than one author, because the list is not updated that often. It does not matter, just check them like the others.
* Technophiles might be interested in collaborating on the [[User:Monk_of_the_highest_order/ASE/code|source code]] used to generate the list.
* Technophiles might be interested in collaborating on the source code used to generate the list:
** SQL script, currently used: See the link above
** [https://github.com/nicolas-raoul/ASE Groovy script], abandoned because it was inefficient, taking a lot of server resources
** [[User:Monk_of_the_highest_order/ASE/code|Dump-based approach]], abandoned because the list would become stale before half of it is reviewed.


{{DEFAULTSORT:{{PAGENAME}}}}
[[Category:Wikipedia maintenance]]
[[Category:Wikipedia maintenance]]

Latest revision as of 19:47, 30 December 2020

Articles written by a single editor have a higher probability of needing attention than those which have received contributions from several editors. So, we generate a list of articles that have been written by an inexperienced editor and have not yet received any collaboration.

Some of the articles are good, but others need to be fixed or flagged appropriately, so that the topic experts can enhance them. When reviewing an article, the underlying idea is: Fix what you can fix and tag the rest, so that more experienced editors can find and fix them.

Helping is easy, fast and even entertaining, if you are curious. First open the Articles list in a new window, and begin reviewing the articles. When you're done, delete the article(s) from the articles list. Feedback is always welcome on the talk page.

How to review an article

[edit]

For each article, check all of the following things:

  • If the article contains insults, random characters, such as "dkhgdsklhskl" or any other nonsense, then revert the problems or delete the nonsense. If there are no good revisions to revert back to, then nominate for speedy deletion.
  • If the article appears to be a blatant advertisement, then place {{advert}}, or if it's irredeemable, add {{db-g11}} at the top of the article.
  • If the article does not have enough wikilinks, then place {{dead end}}, for no links or {{underlinked}}, for few links at the top of the article.
  • If the article is about something that might not be notable enough, then place {{notability}} at the top of the article.
  • If you feel the article needs a topic expert's attention, then place {{expert-subject}} at the top of the article.
  • In any other cases of problematic content, place {{cleanup}}, and explain the problems in the tag or on the talk page, at the top of the article.

Please also check:

  • Stubs: If the article is very short, perhaps only a few sentences and needs to be developed, then it is a stub. If the article is not yet tagged as a stub, then place {{stub}} at the bottom of the article.
  • First sentence: The first sentence of the article must introduce the context. For instance, the Jazz article's first sentence must at least explain that Jazz is a kind of music, with a wikilink to the Music article. If it does not, please fix it. If fixing it is too difficult, place {{lead rewrite}} at the top of the article.
  • Sources: If the article does not cite any sources or references for facts that are likely to be challenged, then paste {{unreferenced}} at the top of the article. If it has some sources, but you think it needs more, place {{citations missing}} at the top of the article. If there are sources, open them and check that the content of the article matches.

What to do if the list is empty

[edit]
  1. Take note of the "magic number" which can be found at the bottom of the articles list (for instance: 1050).
  2. Go to https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/48504
  3. Log in (you can use your Wikimedia account).
  4. Press "Fork".
  5. At the first line of the script (which starts with "SET @MAGIC"), replace the number with the one you got in step 1.
  6. Press "Submit Query".
  7. Wait until the query completes, it can take up to 30 minutes.
  8. A list of page titles appears at the bottom. Press "Download" and "TSV".
  9. Open the TSV file with any text editor.
  10. Copy the content to the articles list (just the line after "List:").
  11. Increment the magic number by 50, for instance if it was 1050 replace it with 1100, and save.

If anything does not work as expected, please detail the problem on my talk page, thanks!

Userbox

[edit]

You may be interested in placing the userbox shown below onto your userpage with the following code:

  • {{Wikipedia:Articles written by a single editor/Userbox}}

Notes

[edit]
  • If you would like an article to be checked, simply add it to any section of the articles list.
  • Some of the listed articles may already have more than one author, because the list is not updated that often. It does not matter, just check them like the others.
  • Technophiles might be interested in collaborating on the source code used to generate the list:
    • SQL script, currently used: See the link above
    • Groovy script, abandoned because it was inefficient, taking a lot of server resources
    • Dump-based approach, abandoned because the list would become stale before half of it is reviewed.