Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian post-hardcore: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 01:51, 6 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christian post-hardcore

Delete is this a definable and notable genre? is this article the right start? no sources, no context, no nothing... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 16:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It barely isn't A1 because of the second sentence even though it really doesn't help the context by adding two bands to it. I'll agree that there isn't any sources and thus fails WP:GNG. Tavix | Talk 16:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix | Talk 16:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix | Talk 16:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an unsourced arbitrary combination of two topics. Jclemens (talk) 17:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - technically, this could be speedily deleted due to lack of context. I found 14,300 Ghits, but nothing in Google news. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrocrunk. Bearian (talk) 18:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not only does the article not have any sources.....it doesn't really have any information. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was  '''Delete''' --[[User:JForget|<span style="color:orange;">'''JForget''' </span>]] 23:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 ===[[Christian post-hardcore]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|U}}
 :{{la|Christian post-hardcore}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Christian post-hardcore|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian post-hardcore]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian post-hardcore|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 June 30#{{anchorencode:Christian post-hardcore}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 '''Delete''' is this a definable and notable genre? is this article the right start? no sources, no context, no nothing... [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] ([[User talk:Carlossuarez46|talk]]) 16:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' It barely isn't A1 because of the second sentence even though it really doesn't help the context by adding two bands to it. I'll agree that there isn't any sources and thus fails [[WP:GNG]]. <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;">[[User:Tavix|<b>Tavix</b>]] | [[User_talk:Tavix|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 16:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' It barely isn't A1 because of the second sentence even though it really doesn't help the context by adding two bands to it. I'll agree that there isn't any sources and thus fails [[WP:GNG]]. <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;">[[User:Tavix|<b>Tavix</b>]] | [[User_talk:Tavix|<span style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</span>]] </span></small> 16:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
-*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Music|list of Music-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;">[[User:Tavix|<b>Tavix</b>]] | [[User_talk:Tavix|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 16:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)</small>
+*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Music|list of Music-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;">[[User:Tavix|<b>Tavix</b>]] | [[User_talk:Tavix|<span style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</span>]] </span></small> 16:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)</small>
-*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Christianity|list of Christianity-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;">[[User:Tavix|<b>Tavix</b>]] | [[User_talk:Tavix|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 16:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)</small>
+*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Christianity|list of Christianity-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;">[[User:Tavix|<b>Tavix</b>]] | [[User_talk:Tavix|<span style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</span>]] </span></small> 16:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' as an unsourced arbitrary combination of two topics. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 17:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' - technically, this could be speedily deleted due to lack of context.  I found [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Christian+post-hardcore%22&aq=f&oq=&aqi= 14,300 Ghits], but [http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=%22Christian%20post-hardcore%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn nothing in Google news].  See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrocrunk]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 18:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''. Not only does the article not have any sources.....it doesn't really have any information. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 02:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>