Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Block, Inc.: Difference between revisions

Block, Inc.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Block, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page appears to be a duplicate of the existing Square (financial services company) article. I propose that the article be reverted to the redirect that it was prior to 1 February. Chrisclear (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

See Talk:Square (financial services company)#Splitting proposal for more info DownTownRich (talk) 18:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

• Redirect to Square (financial services company) because this is just a duplicate of it. ThePremiumBoy (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 07:55, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
• The company has changed its name. The page should have been moved to the new title instead of copy-pasted at the new title.— Diannaa (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
• Comment As nominator, I agree with ThePremiumBoy, that Block, Inc. should redirect to Square (financial services company). Chrisclear (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

• Redirect per nom - DownTownRich (talk) 17:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete, and then move the Block article to this title, which will leave the redirect around the other direction. W Nowicki (talk) 19:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect because it is a duplicate.Fulmard (talk) 19:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect Square (financial services company) to Block, Inc. (and I mean this title) since Square, Inc. has already been renamed to Block, Inc. The article's title should reflect to the company's current name. 20chances (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect to this one.