[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furanolactone: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Polonium (talk | contribs)
Line 9: Line 9:
[[Image:Furan-2-one.png|thumb|50px|right|Furan-2-one]]
[[Image:Furan-2-one.png|thumb|50px|right|Furan-2-one]]
*'''Comment'''. OK, this has gotten me curious, so I've done a bit of research. The article says that furanolactone is the same as furan-2-one. Furan-2-one is a real compound with the structure at the right. However, Chemical Abstracts (the authorative chemical database) does not include furanolactone as a synonym for furan-2-one. The term "furanolactone" does turn up in the chemical literature, but only to describe a broad class of natural chemical compounds that contain both a [[furan]] ring and a separate [[lactone]] ring, which are completely distinct from furan-2-one. This is probably what [[User:WilyD]]'s Google hits are turning up too. An example is the hallucinogen [[salvinorin A]]. So there are two separate things here which the [[furanolactone]] article seems to conflate. --[[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 17:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. OK, this has gotten me curious, so I've done a bit of research. The article says that furanolactone is the same as furan-2-one. Furan-2-one is a real compound with the structure at the right. However, Chemical Abstracts (the authorative chemical database) does not include furanolactone as a synonym for furan-2-one. The term "furanolactone" does turn up in the chemical literature, but only to describe a broad class of natural chemical compounds that contain both a [[furan]] ring and a separate [[lactone]] ring, which are completely distinct from furan-2-one. This is probably what [[User:WilyD]]'s Google hits are turning up too. An example is the hallucinogen [[salvinorin A]]. So there are two separate things here which the [[furanolactone]] article seems to conflate. --[[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 17:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
:Here are two possible isomers ( I ignored all the info about the furan-2-one, I have just looked at the title name). [[User:Polonium|Polonium]] 17:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
[[Image:3-Furanolactone.PNG|100px]][[Image:2-Furanolactone.PNG|100px]]

Revision as of 17:49, 28 July 2006

Furanolactone

What does the article mean when it states "Furanolactone is a lactone that uses the furan ring structure." Since once the two-position has the double bond to the carbon atom and the single bond to oxygen atom, you can only make a single bond, and not a double bond, as the statement implies (a lactone would need the C=O double bond, whcich would be impossible as specified before). Other arangements may be possible (with only one double bond, etc.), but this article gives a misleading discription (I originally wanted to add a chem structure, but then ran into this problem). Very little context, room for expansion. Only google hits I found where mirrors and refrences to a "diterpenoid furanolactone columbin" which appears to be unrelated. Due to this, delete or rewrite. Polonium 22:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To prevent confusion, this is not Gamma-butyrolactone. It has the structure . It is a different compound, because furanolactone is not listed as an other name of the compound. Polonium 22:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Furanolactone is a real chemical compound, similar to GBL as you note, but with a double bond in the ring. I don't know of any notable uses of furanolactone, either in industry or in research; so unless someone can note some usefullness, there is currently no reason for this article. --Ed (Edgar181) 23:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If it is a real compound, then this article should exist, after a rewrite. After all, Wikipedia is not paper. I can rewrite it, I only need to know the chem structure (where the carbon-carbon double bond is). Polonium 17:00, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Furan-2-one
  • Comment. OK, this has gotten me curious, so I've done a bit of research. The article says that furanolactone is the same as furan-2-one. Furan-2-one is a real compound with the structure at the right. However, Chemical Abstracts (the authorative chemical database) does not include furanolactone as a synonym for furan-2-one. The term "furanolactone" does turn up in the chemical literature, but only to describe a broad class of natural chemical compounds that contain both a furan ring and a separate lactone ring, which are completely distinct from furan-2-one. This is probably what User:WilyD's Google hits are turning up too. An example is the hallucinogen salvinorin A. So there are two separate things here which the furanolactone article seems to conflate. --Ed (Edgar181) 17:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Here are two possible isomers ( I ignored all the info about the furan-2-one, I have just looked at the title name). Polonium 17:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:3-Furanolactone.PNGFile:2-Furanolactone.PNG