[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Key Largo (boat): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate
Neon white (talk | contribs)
Line 18: Line 18:
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:'''Delete''' Non-notable product stub, article makes no indication of why it is notable. The only mention of this product I can find is on the manufacturers website. --<span style="font-size: 10pt; text-decoration: underline; color:black; border: 1pt solid white; padding: 0pt 4pt; background-color: white;">neon white</span><small> [[User_talk:Neon white|talk]]</small> 13:13, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:13, 10 November 2012

Key Largo (boat) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to demonstrate notability, the page is for all intents and purposes empty and is a dead end with no links to any other pages & possibly WP:NOTCATALOG Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep The company, sessa marine, is a notable yacht builder and the model mentioned comes up easily in a google search. If article can be expanded upon and notable sources are cited. It will qualify.Righteousskills (talk) 23:46, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 11:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep Not a lot, but I was able to find a review from an American magazine and several references in Italian. It might make more sense to have an article on the manufacturer and merge this to that. Mangoe (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable product stub, article makes no indication of why it is notable. The only mention of this product I can find is on the manufacturers website. --neon white talk 13:13, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]