Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L3MEDIA: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:43, 28 March 2007

L3MEDIA

Article does not meet the primary inclusion criterion for notable companies: it has not been treated as a subject in reliable secondary sources. The claims in the article cannot be verified from reliable secondary sources, and removing the unverifiable claims would leave an article that would meet speedy deletion criterion A1: little or no context. Finally, the original author of the article, San Diego PR (talk · contribs), appears to be an astroturfing organization similar to MyWikiBiz; if true, this would violate the conflict of interest guideline. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 06:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree mostly with nom. There isn't even a clear assertion of notability here. -SpuriousQ (talk) 06:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 06:36, 28 March 2007 edit Kaustuv (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,870 edits m →‎[[L3MEDIA]]: corrections ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:43, 28 March 2007 edit undo SpuriousQ (talk \| contribs) Administrators 18,086 edits →‎[[L3MEDIA]]: delete Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Article does not meet the [[WP:CORP\|primary inclusion criterion for notable companies]]: it has not been treated as a subject in [[WP:RS\|reliable secondary sources]]. The claims in the article cannot be [[WP:V\|verified]] from reliable secondary sources, and removing the unverifiable claims would leave an article that would meet [[WP:CSD#A1\|speedy deletion criterion A1: little or no context]]. Finally, the original author of the article, {{user\|San Diego PR}}, appears to be an [[astroturf]]ing organization similar to MyWikiBiz; if true, this would violate the [[WP:COI\|conflict of interest]] guideline. <span style="white-space:nowrap">— [[User talk:Kaustuv\|Kaustuv Chaudhuri]]</span> 06:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)		Article does not meet the [[WP:CORP\|primary inclusion criterion for notable companies]]: it has not been treated as a subject in [[WP:RS\|reliable secondary sources]]. The claims in the article cannot be [[WP:V\|verified]] from reliable secondary sources, and removing the unverifiable claims would leave an article that would meet [[WP:CSD#A1\|speedy deletion criterion A1: little or no context]]. Finally, the original author of the article, {{user\|San Diego PR}}, appears to be an [[astroturf]]ing organization similar to MyWikiBiz; if true, this would violate the [[WP:COI\|conflict of interest]] guideline. <span style="white-space:nowrap">— [[User talk:Kaustuv\|Kaustuv Chaudhuri]]</span> 06:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
			* '''Delete''' agree mostly with nom. There isn't even a clear assertion of notability here. -[[User:SpuriousQ\|SpuriousQ]] ([[User talk:SpuriousQ\|talk]]) 06:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)