Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Victoria's Secret models: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
k |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fashion|list of Fashion-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Jinkinson|<font color="orange">Jinkinson</font>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<font color="green">talk to me</font>]] 13:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fashion|list of Fashion-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Jinkinson|<font color="orange">Jinkinson</font>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<font color="green">talk to me</font>]] 13:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''' - There are problems with the list that the nom brings up, but none that merit deletion as far as I can tell. It needs sources, but even a brief gsearch returns a ''lot'', suggesting it easily passes GNG. Nationality might not be necessary and other information would be good, but neither are cause to [[WP:BLOWITUP]]. --— <tt>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></tt> \\ 15:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - There are problems with the list that the nom brings up, but none that merit deletion as far as I can tell. It needs sources, but even a brief gsearch returns a ''lot'', suggesting it easily passes GNG. Nationality might not be necessary and other information would be good, but neither are cause to [[WP:BLOWITUP]]. --— <tt>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></tt> \\ 15:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - no need for flags and sources are available. <span class="vcard"><span class="nickname">[[User:Zambelo|Zambelo]]</span>; [[User talk:Zambelo|talk]]</span> 06:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:46, 19 October 2014
- List of Victoria's Secret models (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Effectively unsourced list that does not provide any additional information other than nationality (which is also unsourced, frequently debated, and not generally relevant for models). Tgeairn (talk) 05:49, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - There are problems with the list that the nom brings up, but none that merit deletion as far as I can tell. It needs sources, but even a brief gsearch returns a lot, suggesting it easily passes GNG. Nationality might not be necessary and other information would be good, but neither are cause to WP:BLOWITUP. --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - no need for flags and sources are available. Zambelo; talk 06:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC)