[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Hatnote: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 3: Line 3:
== Examples of improper use ==
== Examples of improper use ==
<!-- Examples for which permalinks are given are taken verbatim from said revisions. Do not perform any copy editing on such examples without discussing it first on the talk page. -->
<!-- Examples for which permalinks are given are taken verbatim from said revisions. Do not perform any copy editing on such examples without discussing it first on the talk page. -->
==={{anchor|NAMB}}Disambiguating article names that are not ambiguous===
{{shortcut|WP:NAMB|WP:NOTAMB}}
It is usually preferable not to have a hatnote when the name of the article is not ambiguous.
<blockquote style="margin-bottom: 0pt; background-color: white; color: red; border:1px solid black; padding: 1em;">
<big>'''Water (Wu Xing)'''</big>
----
{{Other uses|Water (disambiguation)}}
'''Water''' ({{zh|c=水|p=shuǐ}}), is the low point of the matter, or the matter's dying or hiding stage. Water is the fifth stage of [[Wu Xing]]. ...
</blockquote>

Here, the hatnote can be removed. A reader who is following links within Wikipedia is unlikely to end up at [[Water (Wu Xing)]] if they were looking for other meanings of water, since [[water]] does not redirect there.

A hatnote may still be appropriate when even a more specific name is still ambiguous. For example, [[Tree (set theory)]] might still be confused with [[Tree (descriptive set theory)]].

The presence or absence of hatnotes in articles with disambiguated titles has been a contentious issue, and this guideline doesn't prescribe one way or the other. There are cases where some editors strongly believe that such hatnotes should be included, such as the various articles about treaties called [[Treaty of Paris]].

A hatnote '''may be appropriate''' in an unambiguously named article '''when an ambiguous term redirects to it''', as explained in {{section link|#Ambiguous term that redirects to an unambiguously named article}} above.


Each additional link in the hatnote besides the ambiguous or confusable topic(s) makes it more difficult to find the desired target. For

'''WTIX''' (980 [[AM broadcasting|AM]]) is a [[radio station]] broadcasting a [[sports talk|Sports radio]] format.
</blockquote>

In this case, the link to [[New Orleans, Louisiana]], in the hatnote leads to an article that is not ambiguous with the title. Linking only to the possible other destination ([[WIST (AM)]]) makes it easier to find the link.

===External links===
===External links===
{{shortcut|WP:ELHAT}}
{{shortcut|WP:ELHAT}}

Revision as of 08:09, 14 May 2021

Examples of proper use

Examples of improper use

A previous version of the Hurricane Katrina article contained:

Hurricane Katrina, which made landfall near New Orleans, Louisiana, on August 29, 2005, was one of the most destructive and expensive tropical cyclones to hit the United States. ...

The use of external help links in Wikipedia, though noble, cannot reasonably be maintained. In special cases, a link to an "External links" section may be appropriate, but POV favoritism can be obstructive. In this case, the hatnote was removed entirely.

Non-existent articles

Hatnotes should not contain red links to non-existent articles since hatnotes are intended to help users navigate to another article they may have intended to find. The exception is if one intends to create the linked article immediately. In that case, consider creating the new article first, before saving the addition of the hatnote.

Hatnote templates

Generic hatnote

{{Hatnote}} allows general text to be shown in hatnote format. It is appropriate when none of the other specific templates listed below includes the combination of parameters needed, or to combine several of them in a single hatnote.

  • {{Hatnote|CUSTOM TEXT}}
{{Hatnote|For other senses of this term, see [[etc…]]}}
  • {{Selfref}} (a generic template for self-references to Wikipedia material)

Other uses of the same title ("For …, see …")

Per WP:NAMB, it is usually preferable not to have a hatnote when the name of the article is not ambiguous.

"This page is about … For other uses …"

{{About}} is the main template for noting other uses.

Note: When used in main namespace (aka mainspace), the word "page" in the following hatnotes is replaced by "article".

  • {{About|USE1}}
  • {{About|USE1||PAGE2}} (When the disambiguation page has a different name – Note the empty second parameter) →
  • {{About|USE1|USE2|PAGE2}} (When there is only one other use) →
  • {{About|USE1|USE2|PAGE2|and|PAGE3}} (Two pages for USE2) →
  • {{About|USE1|USE2|PAGE2#SUBSECTION{{!}}PAGE2TITLE}} (Using the {{!}} magic word to give the link a different title) →
  • {{About|USE1|USE2|PAGE2|other uses}} (When there are several standard other uses and also a disambiguation page with default name – Note that the last page name is not specified) →
  • {{About|USE1|USE2|PAGE2|other uses|PAGE3}} (When there are several standard other uses and also a disambiguation page with non-default name) →
  • {{About||USE2|PAGE2|USE3|PAGE3|other uses}} (When you don't need to state the focus of this article/page – Note the empty first parameter) →
  • {{About|||PAGE1|and|PAGE2}}
Note: {{for||PAGE1|PAGE2}} produces the same result.
Note: this hatnote says "section", instead of "article" or "page".
  • {{About|USE1|text=TEXT}}

"This page is about … It is not to be confused with …"

{{About-distinguish}} is a template for noting other uses when there could be confusion with another topic.

"For other uses, see …"

When such a wordy hatnote as {{About}} is not needed, {{Other uses}} is often useful.

Variations
There are, historically, a whole family of "other uses" templates for specific cases. {{About}} is the standard hatnote for "other uses" and many of them can be specified using the {{About}} template. However, the individual templates may be easier to use in certain contexts.
Here are the variations and (when appropriate) the equivalents using the {{About}}, {{Other uses}} or {{For}} templates.
"For other uses of …, see …"

Redirect

=

  • {{Redirect|REDIRECT}}
  • {{Redirect|REDIRECT||PAGE1}}
  • {{Redirect|REDIRECT|USE1|PAGE1}}
  • {{Redirect|REDIRECT|USE1|PAGE1|USE2|PAGE2}} → {{Redirect|REDIRECT|USE1|PAGE1|USE2|PAGE2}
  • {{Redirect|REDIRECT|USE1|PAGE1|and|PAGE2}}
Variations

"For technical reasons, … redirects here. …

… redirects here. It is not to be confused with …

Similar proper names ("For other people named ...")

Other people

Note: defaults to "named" as in {{Other people}}, exists for options like "nicknamed", "known as", etc.

Other places/ships/hurricanes

Distinguish

"Not to be confused with …"

"… redirects here. It is not to be confused with …"

Family names

Family names can also be clarified using inline footnotes, such as with {{Efn Chinese name}}.

For use in sections

"Main article: …"

{{Main}} is used to make summary style explicit, when used in a summary section for which there is also a separate article on the subject:

"Further information: …"

{{Further}} can supplement {{Main}} in summary sections, or can indicate more details in nonsummary sections:

"See also …"

{{See also}} can be used at the head of a section.

Note: use only when OTHER TOPIC PAGE is related to current article and contains a self-explanatory parenthetical.

Article or section transclusions

For category pages

Category-specific templates:

This is a template for linking categories horizontally. Horizontal linkage is often the right solution when vertical linkage (i.e., as sub-category and parent category) is not appropriate. In most cases, this template should be used on both categories to create reciprocal linkage between the two categories.

Lists

What to do before editing or creating a template

These templates are used in literally thousands of articles; therefore, changing the syntax could break thousands of articles. If you wish to create or edit a disambiguation or redirection template, first ask yourself the following questions:

  1. Is there already a template that will do this job? Since many disambiguation and redirection templates have already been created, first check: Category:Hatnote templates.
  2. Do I really need a new template for this? Will it likely be used on any other articles or should I just use {{Hatnote}} instead? Before creating a new template, see the template namespace guideline.
  3. If I change the parameters around on an existing template, do I know what the result will be? Will it break existing uses of the template and if so, can I fix all of the errors? Before making any changes, see Wikipedia:Template sandbox and test cases.

See also

References