[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 22: Line 22:
*
*
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Holiday Wishes (Idina Menzel album) | 2 = Holiday Wishes | discuss = | reason = The unqualified title is currently a dab page listing four works. Only one of the four entries is an article, the others are mentions with or without corresponding redirects. In those circumstances, I believe it's generally preferred to have the article at the unqualified address and the dab page at "(disambiguation)", yes? | sig = [[Special:Contributions/89.183.221.75|89.183.221.75]] ([[User talk:89.183.221.75|talk]]) 19:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC) | requester = 89.183.221.75}}
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Holiday Wishes (Idina Menzel album) | 2 = Holiday Wishes | discuss = | reason = The unqualified title is currently a dab page listing four works. Only one of the four entries is an article, the others are mentions with or without corresponding redirects. In those circumstances, I believe it's generally preferred to have the article at the unqualified address and the dab page at "(disambiguation)", yes? | sig = [[Special:Contributions/89.183.221.75|89.183.221.75]] ([[User talk:89.183.221.75|talk]]) 19:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC) | requester = 89.183.221.75}}
*:The dabpage is unnecessary; a hatnote to [[Holiday Wishes: From Me to You]] is sufficient. [[User:162 etc.|162 etc.]] ([[User talk:162 etc.|talk]]) 20:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


==== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ====
==== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ====

Revision as of 20:07, 5 March 2024

Shortcuts
Shortcuts

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Add a new request
Remove all requests

Technical requests

Edit this section if you want to move a request between sections.

Uncontroversial technical requests

Most requests should be placed below this heading.
  • Hunawng (24°49′N 94°53′E) (currently a redirect to Hulaung) → Hulaung (move · discuss) – incorrect place name, based on the map and lack of place code a second Hunaung in the vicinity of this village's coordinates.
Note: I can make Hunawng a redirect to the other Hunawng/Hunaung after this move; overall there are three villages with similar names I'm attempting WP:NATURAL disambiguation with based on the english romanizations used by the two sources I found (the two "Hulaung"s have different Burmese names, so it's a romanization choice to disambiguate) EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 19:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

If your request involves reverting a move, place it here.
  • History of Western Christianity (currently a redirect to History of Christianity) → History of Christianity (move · discuss) – This was recently moved as part of a GA reassessment, where it was suggested that the article didn't have sufficient coverage of eastern Christianity. The "solution" to this was apparently to completely change the scope of the article,which means we now don't have a history of Christianity article at all. I think this was definitely a WP:PCM whcuy should at the very least be discussed at RM. The better solution would be to hive off material into child articles if its excessive, and then bring in the necessary detail on eastern and indeed Christianity in the global south as new summary prose.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested technical requests

Do not insert new requests in this section. Only move requests here if the requested move has been contested.
Unless and until the French writer has an article on the English Wikipedia, this article title is unambiguous. Adding "Peralta" simply for the sake of disambiguation also violates WP:COMMONNAME. 162 etc. (talk) 16:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Benjamin Bryant (broadcaster) → Benjamin Bryant (move · discuss) – Subject is only current, living person named "Benjamin Bryant" on Wikipedia, and is the top result on Google and Bing for "Benjamin Bryant." Additionally, descriptor (broadcaster) is insufficient/inaccurate. Article documents valid notability in multiple fields, including as government official on historic projects, actor/filmmaker, and as a media figure (including, but not limited to, broadcasting). This title is currently a redirect to the disambiguation page. MHWood82 (talk) 20:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Primary topic grabs are, by definition, not uncontroversial. Dabpage has been moved back to its stable title. 162 etc. (talk) 22:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MHWood82: Note that the policy standard for moving this to the base name "Benjamin Bryant" without disambiguation can be found at WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Toolforge:WikiNav shows that there were 11 click-throughs from the disambiguation page Benjamin Bryant to Ben Bryant (American football) in the past month and <10 to Benjamin Bryant (broadcaster) (i.e., fewer than the threshold for Wikipedia to report the numbers). Living subjects aren't the only ones considered (see the essay about WP:Recentism), and the "Ben" articles each indicate those are short for Benjamin. This move is potentially controversial, so it would require a requested-move discussion, which you can begin by clicking "discuss" on your request. You can remove this request after opening a discussion (or if you do not want to continue). SilverLocust 💬 00:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The usage of "clones" is accurate here because there are multiple Apple II clones. The singular would be used if there was only one clone. EggRoll97 (talk) 00:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ComputerUserUser: These three technical requests have been contested. As such, they would require requested-move discussions, which you can begin by clicking "discuss" on your requests. You can remove them after opening discussions (or if you do not want to continue). SilverLocust 💬 00:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This should go through AFC in my opinion. I have my doubts of whether it would survive a deletion discussion. EggRoll97 (talk) 23:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have never gone through AFC unless a WP:COI. On what grounds would this be deleted. It should be clear that an influencer is different than an Internet celebrity, which is the point. Some internet celebrities are not influencers and some influencers are not internet celebrities. Thus, we need a new article. This is stub/start territory, but not AFD territory.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TonyTheTiger The place to discuss this would be the talk page for Internet celebrity. I see you tried and got no response, but you didn't use WP:PROPSPLIT, which would help. You could also let various related wikiprojects know about the discussion. -- asilvering (talk) 06:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TonyTheTiger is well past the autoconfirmed threshhold and unlikely to have a CoI here. I fail to see why this would need to go through AfC, as AfC encourages established editors to create articles on their own. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Three editors have already expressed WP:N concerns, so this should definitely be discussed somewhere, and WP:RMT is not the best place for that. I see OP has opened a thread at Talk:Internet celebrity#Splitting article, but no discussion ensued. 162 etc. (talk) 16:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, but AFC isn't the best place for that either. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Main issue I see here is that content from Internet celebrity would need to be moved to the new article as well, rather than just a new page. As asilvering put it, proposing through PROPSPLIT would make most sense here, as I don't doubt there is enough content that already exists on IC to move to Inlufencer. Best of luck with it. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
With SkyDrive being the former name of OneDrive until 10 years ago, discussion is needed for usurping the SkyDrive title. GTrang (talk) 04:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

Edit this section only if your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been fully protected or move protected (see this guide to which moves need administrators). Place your request in another section if it only requires a page mover.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests&oldid=1212024851"