Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sfacets: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:42, 10 October 2014

Sfacets

Sfacets (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sfacets/Archive.

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

Requests for checkuser/Case/Sfacets

09 October 2014

– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.

Suspected sockpuppets

Couchbeing (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Zambelo (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

Evidence was collected by AndyTheGrump; I'm sure Andy doesn't mind if I summarize here. All three are/were active editors in the NRM (New Religious Movement) field. Sfacets was blocked in 2008 (for "exhausting the community's patience"), and Couchbeing was blocked for socking. Zambelo caught everyone's attention with their behavior in the NRM field, and Andy discovered that besides all the cult stuff Zambelo and Sfacets also share an interest in Sahaja Yoga and Bohemia (musician): both "patrol" the Bohemia article (Sfacets: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]; Zambelo [6], [7], [8]). That's already a pretty unlikely combination, but most damning is the simple article overlap, which is quite astounding: most of those articles are NRM-related articles, including such esoteric articles as Jean-Marie Abgrall

I don't know if Andy has anything to add; personally I am convinced that these are the same. Drmies (talk) 03:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC) Drmies (talk) 03:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

@Drmies: Sfacets and Couchbeing haven't edited since 2008 and are therefore stale for CU purposes. There is no technical data that can be used to compare against Zambelo. Any connection made will need to be based on behavioural evidence.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ponyo. Sorry, that makes sense. Drmies (talk) 19:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, you really seem to have exhausted all venues of attack now. Zambelo; talk 02:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 {{Ping|Drmies}} {{U|Sfacets}} and {{U|Couchbeing}} haven't edited since 2008 and are therefore stale for CU purposes. There is no technical data that can be used to compare against {{U|Zambelo}}. Any connection made will need to be based on behavioural evidence.--[[User:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">Jezebel's '''Ponyo'''</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup>  18:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 *Thanks {{U|Ponyo}}. Sorry, that makes sense. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 19:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
+Oh wow, you really seem to have exhausted all venues of attack now. <span class="vcard"><span class="nickname">[[User:Zambelo|Zambelo]]</span>; [[User talk:Zambelo|talk]]</span> 02:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->