[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 19: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 83: Line 83:


==== [[Template:2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group A]] and related templates ====
==== [[Template:2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group A]] and related templates ====
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''

The result of the discussion was '''delete'''<!-- Tfd top -->. [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 14:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
* {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group A}}
* {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group A}}
* {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group B}}
* {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group B}}
Line 98: Line 102:
*'''delete''' per nom, [[WP:LST]] works here. [[User:Frietjes|Frietjes]] ([[User talk:Frietjes|talk]]) 23:19, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''delete''' per nom, [[WP:LST]] works here. [[User:Frietjes|Frietjes]] ([[User talk:Frietjes|talk]]) 23:19, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as per nom. [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 13:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as per nom. [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 13:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''</div>


==== [[Template:Inter-Provincial Twenty20 color]] ====
==== [[Template:Inter-Provincial Twenty20 color]] ====

Revision as of 14:21, 26 October 2022

< October 18 October 20 >

October 19

Template:Invalid parameters category

No transclusions, incoming links, categories, or documentation. An abandoned experiment? – Jonesey95 (User :Jonesey95) 23:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

example.com:Pppery|it has begun...]] 01:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Template:Zen Lineage Mel Weitsman

Unused and is article content. Same list exists on the Mel Weitsman article. No need for this anymore. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tanduay Light Rhum Masters roster

Single-use. Substitute on mainspace article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Café France Bakers roster

Unused. Hasn't been updated since 2016. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1920/21 Richmond dual premiership players

Respective navboxes for each season already exist. Template:1920 Richmond premiership players, Template:1921 Richmond premiership players, Template:1932 Richmond premiership players, Template:1934 Richmond premiership players. Dual premiership is not a thing for any sport. Even if players win two ore more championships. More navboxes are not needed here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1973/74 Richmond dual premiership players

Navboxes for both teams championship exist with Template:1973 Richmond premiership players and Template:1974 Richmond premiership players. No need for another when two are already doing the job. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1967/69 Richmond dual premiership players

Navboxes for the championship Richmond teams exists with Template:1967 Richmond premiership players and Template:1969 Richmond premiership players. No need for another. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2017/19 Richmond dual premiership players

Thr 2017/2019 is unused and duplicates the entries already on Template:2017 Richmond premiership players, Template:2019 Richmond premiership players, and Template:2020 Richmond premiership players. Dual and triple premierships do not exist as a thing in Australian rules football. I think this navbox is trying to make one championship navbox for Richmond's three championship seasons for 2017, 2019, and 2020. But normally for championship teams, we use a single navbox for each season. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:46, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GridStart

These three new column-generating templates were used at Wikipedia:WikiProject Autonomous Zones until I modified that page to use one of our existing column-generating template sets (without changing the page's appearance). We do not need yet another set of column-generating templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Afghanistan conflict detailed map

Totally fails WP:V. The war is over and this map has outlived its usefulness. People are updating control of towns based on hearsay (from Twitter, including citing rebels themselves!) that there was a clash in the town with rebels. A clash does not mean control, and these reports are unverified. RS tell us the Taliban have effective control of the whole country. Many of the reports being used are wildly out of date. These clashes need to be discussed in prose; there is not enough verifiable information for a map. 25stargeneral (talk) 21:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'm not entirely sure what effective control means, but consider putting any recent info from RS into Republican insurgency in Afghanistan, as its tone seems to imply there's a reasonable area not under their control, and its lead seem to be over half a year out of date. If poor info is being put into the detailed map, it likely is ending up there too. Banak (talk) 00:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Yes there is a thing with being out of date due to the poor information environment (this is why the idea of removing non-NRF rebellions from the map after a certain amount of inactivity has been floated before). However, tweets are used in compliance with WP:TWITTER and WP:SPS (I don't use anything that isn't from a news outlet or a verified journalist.) I don't see anyone citing the NRF spokesman either (he's a clown but that's besides the point).
Regarding clashes, I think we're well-aware that they don't mean control. There was a questionable addition of "clashes" to the map at the beginning of October, which was reverted. However, I don't see anyone purporting that "clashes = control." Firestar464 (talk) 03:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that one? I didn't cite him in the actual edit; I simply found an article with the names of the villages so that I could search for coords. --Firestar464 (talk) 03:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While the map most certainly may be somewhat out of date in some areas, the claim against us using twitter as a source doesn't make sense as we have only been using (as Firestar said) either tweets coming from Afghan journalists, or news sources and we have even reverted some territorial changes on the map which aren't covered by any RS. Cryw 9 (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The key point is that the war is over, so the map is no longer needed. No insurgent group is holding significant amounts of Afghan territory for any substantial amount of time. I would like to see an actual RS article saying otherwise, since there hasn't been anything other than clashes described since Panjshir Valley, last resistance holdout in Afghanistan, falls to the Taliban. This is a low-level insurgency, and it is misleading to be portraying it as a full-scale civil war. 25stargeneral (talk) 18:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not per the nominator's rationale, but per Talk:Taliban insurgency#RfC on the Taliban insurgency situation map establishing this map shouldn't be used. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That was referring to the map on Commons, not the template map. --Firestar464 (talk) 03:39, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Are those different? My understanding was that the map on Commons was generated from the template map, and thus the two are the same. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:54, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Commons map was entirely based on some Twitter dude, while the one currently being discussed was obviously better sourced (albeit somewhat polluted as well) AFAIK. Hence the debate about the Commons map. Firestar464 (talk) 09:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. It appears that the relevant article(s) have been adjusted to transclude this article content from another article instead of using templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Inter-Provincial Twenty20 color

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links from discussions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NS Stoptrein lines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Nederlandse Spoorwegen Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NS Sprinter color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Nederlandse Spoorwegen Frietjes (talk) 19:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Train templates with no transclusions; replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/DB Regio Baden-Württemberg and similar as part of the S-line migration project. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User United States territory/cat

Shared documentation page that is no longer used, because Category:United States user categories and Category:United States territories user categories are container categories, and all of their subcategories use shared documentation pages that are unique to a state or territory. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User za-0/doc

Not needed, since the parent template uses the standard shared documentation template, {{User x}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Userstats

No transclusions after existing for eight months. The creator did not express an interest in keeping it around for development. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Lombardy/cat

Unused documentation template. The relevant categories that apparently hosted it have been deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User currently listening to/doc/main

Unused subpage of a template documentation page. Created in 2012. Created as a test? – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User attribute

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Created in 2013. Presumably, some other template does the job that this one was created for. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2022–23 ICC T20 World Cup East Asia-Pacific Qualifier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As per previous deletions, we now only use inline invoke sports table within cricket articles for most events other than things like the World Cup. See the other table used on the same article. The template for this regional qualification event is highly unlikely to be used any where other than this one article. Bs1jac (talk) 11:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per discussion at WT:SPORT - proposed deletion and replacement with List of current National Football League staffs. WP:NAVBOXes are designed for linking articles to other articles, not for linking an articles to many other templates as is the use in the template. There's no need for a navigation box half way through an article only for current leagues. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_19&oldid=1118346142"