Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 October 25: Difference between revisions
→Template:Recess: Closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
OwenBlacker (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
*'''Comment''' isn't [[Chosungul]] the same as [[Hangul]] ? Thus the stricture of not using it for NK doesn't seem to make sense, you could just redirect {{tl|Chosungul}} to {{tl|Hangul}} or call it {{tl|Hunminjeongeum}} -- [[Special:Contributions/65.92.244.127|65.92.244.127]] ([[User talk:65.92.244.127|talk]]) 05:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' isn't [[Chosungul]] the same as [[Hangul]] ? Thus the stricture of not using it for NK doesn't seem to make sense, you could just redirect {{tl|Chosungul}} to {{tl|Hangul}} or call it {{tl|Hunminjeongeum}} -- [[Special:Contributions/65.92.244.127|65.92.244.127]] ([[User talk:65.92.244.127|talk]]) 05:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
*:There isn't a template for Chosungul anyway; why complicate things when we already have a [[Template:Korean]] that is more neutrally named? I'm not quite fully sure I understood your point so lmk if I misinterpreted [[User:Toobigtokale|toobigtokale]] ([[User talk:Toobigtokale|talk]]) 07:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC) |
*:There isn't a template for Chosungul anyway; why complicate things when we already have a [[Template:Korean]] that is more neutrally named? I'm not quite fully sure I understood your point so lmk if I misinterpreted [[User:Toobigtokale|toobigtokale]] ([[User talk:Toobigtokale|talk]]) 07:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete''' per nom — <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:OwenBlacker|OwenBlacker]]</span> <small>(he/him; [[User talk:OwenBlacker|Talk]])</small></span> 13:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:51, 3 November 2023
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Template:Recess (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Not enough links to warrant a navbox. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 15:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, only two links, much less than the unofficial five link rule. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Template:The Da Vinci Code (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Dan Brown (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:The Da Vinci Code with Template:Dan Brown.
Major crossover with {{Dan Brown}}. No reason the two cannot be combined. --woodensuperman 12:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose, two different topics. The series has its own long-term notability which is well-covered in the navbox. Would be nice if he wrote another in the series, it's been awhile. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- We're not talking about notability, that is firmly established. What we're taking about here the amount of duplication of navigation over the two navboxes. If these are not merged, then {{Dan Brown}} needs to be trimmed of articles such as the soundtrack and video game that are not directly related to him. --woodensuperman 15:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- See the novel series navbox, it has a section for 'Derivative media' and other links which would likely be lost in a merge. If not, please be plainer about what you are thinking of merging and what you would remove in a merge. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- If not merged, would suggest we trim the non-Dan Brown specific articles such as the soundtrack and video games of the films from {{Dan Brown}}. If merged, then would intend to keep all the articles, except Gregory W. Brown which should be trimmed from {{Dan Brown}} anyway as we do not need to link to the author's brother from every article. It is enough that he is mentioned in the article. --woodensuperman 11:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Then would support trimming only the soundtrack and games from Dan Brown's biographical navbox. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:35, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- If not merged, would suggest we trim the non-Dan Brown specific articles such as the soundtrack and video games of the films from {{Dan Brown}}. If merged, then would intend to keep all the articles, except Gregory W. Brown which should be trimmed from {{Dan Brown}} anyway as we do not need to link to the author's brother from every article. It is enough that he is mentioned in the article. --woodensuperman 11:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- See the novel series navbox, it has a section for 'Derivative media' and other links which would likely be lost in a merge. If not, please be plainer about what you are thinking of merging and what you would remove in a merge. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- We're not talking about notability, that is firmly established. What we're taking about here the amount of duplication of navigation over the two navboxes. If these are not merged, then {{Dan Brown}} needs to be trimmed of articles such as the soundtrack and video game that are not directly related to him. --woodensuperman 15:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Satisfies WP:NENAN, useful for navigation among Da Vinci Code articles. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Navbox with only one bluelink. Jenks24 (talk) 11:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Links one other article. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 09:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Template:BS11 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
A deprecated BS-map template per the most recent consensus Wikipedia talk:Route diagram template#RfC: deprecation of BS-map (result: BS-map to be deprecated) and related TfD Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_September_15#Template:BS-map and the only one evaded from deletion by moving from {{BS11/safesubst}} which was kept in a former TfD Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_November_6#Template:BS11 years ago. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- No more using BS-map and related templates. Pldx1 (talk) 10:07, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Template:Hangul (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Documentation on template isn't great, and scope overlaps heavily with Template:Korean and Template:lang-ko toobigtokale (talk) 03:41, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Using the 북-romanisation here, in en:wp, has nothing to do with NK. This is only a retaliation from some old-crocodiles against SK for not having required their permission for deciding about Korean topics. 존경받는 악어 (pun intended). Pldx1 (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- ? "Hangul" is the South Korean romanization, where is the North Korean romanization used? toobigtokale (talk) 13:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment isn't Chosungul the same as Hangul ? Thus the stricture of not using it for NK doesn't seem to make sense, you could just redirect {{Chosungul}} to {{Hangul}} or call it {{Hunminjeongeum}} -- 65.92.244.127 (talk) 05:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- There isn't a template for Chosungul anyway; why complicate things when we already have a Template:Korean that is more neutrally named? I'm not quite fully sure I understood your point so lmk if I misinterpreted toobigtokale (talk) 07:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 13:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)