Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet Professional: Difference between revisions

Pet Professional

A "3 month old web comic" -- Longhair | Talk 09:00, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete -- Longhair | Talk 09:00, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Gazpacho 09:13, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable yet. Also, avoid terms like "going on for three months" because such terms need to be updated every month. It is better to write "Going on since ... ". Sjakkalle 11:24, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 03:51, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advert. ping 08:12, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It looks like it might be notable someday, but not today. Nestea 02:11, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Voting to Keep if only because several well-known (to me, at least, who knows nearly no web-comic producers) web-comic writers are heavily behind this and believe it will take off in a big way. The concept is also nicely twisted. Is there a vote-category of "reveiw in 6 months" ? --Simon Cursitor 07:04, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I follow the webcomics community, and the closest this gets to notable even within that fairly small community is some ill-tempered comments about "What is this doing on the top of The Webcomics List?" A Man In Black 10:06, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Hush whiners. Would you rather prefer the term "pet professional" to refer to the veterinarian? And I've yet to see something else as unique in referance to this term. Also, quite an original theme as well as funny. - Gravitron, pet owner (all you slashdot critics-dissers need a good hour in subspace SVS duelbox spanking, damned sony station newbies)
• Keep Keep it I like it.
• Delete, not notable enough yet.
• Keep. Becoming increasingly well known and is the only known reference to this term.