Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2019-05-31/Discussion report

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

← Back to Discussion report

Discuss this story

Surprise me about admin corruption. Tony (talk) 01:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pythoncoder, thank you very much for this summary. The azwiki proposal page has reached a size that, combined with the chaotic history, makes this Signpost article a welcome overview. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Pythoncoder and The Signpost for this excellent summary. I think it effectively lays out some reasonably contentious debates both locally and globally. StudiesWorld (talk) 10:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great summary.--Vulp here 13:33, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not surprised about this corruption at all. Many people are made about corrupt administrators, illegally blocking and threatening people. All corrupt administrators should be fired! If I had it my way administrators should be required to renew their position every year. I think that would help to weed out corrupt administrators.Catfurball (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While I wouldn’t have the renewals quite so often (because it'd get a bit inefficient, maybe 1.5-2 years?), I support your idea. Remagoxer (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]