[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 30

[edit]

Category:Jandek

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: interlink and delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 10:54, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is a little too slim for an eponymous category. Suggest interlinking the two subcats with {{catseealso}}. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 23:11, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Academics of the University of Cape Coast

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 June 29#Category:Academics of the University of Cape Coast

Category:Pablo Today Records albums

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 June 29#Category:Pablo Today Records albums

Category:Academics of the University of Ghana

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 June 29#Category:Academics of the University of Ghana

Festivals

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 June 29#Festivals

Category:Former administrators

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:02, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is, basically, a little used user category. When I ran into it, I thought about appending it to hundreds of former administrators' user pages but I think that it should be a self-chosen category and not imposed by another editor. But it is not being utilized except for one former administrator so I don't think it is serving a purpose and that is unlikely to change. Besides we have Wikipedia:Former administrators which has much more detailed information for any editor who wants to inquire about the status of former administrators and it is a well-maintained series of pages.
At first I thought I'd go to AN about this category and see what fellow administrators thought but decided to put it up for discussion here instead. Liz Read! Talk! 01:17, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.