Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 March 28

< March 27	March 29 >

March 28

File:I corps.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete Ricky81682 (talk) 05:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused locally, superior version available: File:I corps.svg FASTILY 02:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I used it sometimes on my userpage. I don't want to use your "superior version". Niteshift36 (talk) 03:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, in that case could you please explain why a raster image file is superior to a vector file? -FASTILY 04:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, where did I say a raster image file is superior to a vector file? I don't use it in articles or anything else, just my own page. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin: Niteshift36 just linked the file to their user page -FASTILY 05:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, like I said, I sometimes use it on my userpage, just like I did before [1]. I may even remove it and restore it again. Since it's my page, I can do that.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niteshift36 (talk • contribs) 2016-03-30T00:55:43

Delete. This is not a personal file storage site. There is already a better replacement available. Reh man 13:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And what makes it better? Because Fastily likes the format? If I'm actually using it on my page, then it's not "file storage", is it? Niteshift36 (talk) 13:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag-of-vestlandet.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MER-C (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in mainspace, superior version available at File:Flag of Vestlandet.svg FASTILY 08:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom. Reh man 13:14, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Inseethong.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove from Mitr Chaibancha, keep at Insee thong Ricky81682 (talk) 05:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This fails WP:NFCC#8 and/or WP:NFCC#9 on all pages except Insee thong. Stefan2 (talk) 11:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in Insee thong, Remove from all others. The poster clearly passes WP:NFCC for use in the film's infobox. The poster fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8 in use in the actor's biographical article. The poster caption talks about his death in the film that is already better described in paragraphs in the article. There is no commentary about the poster thereby doing nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the topic and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the topic. The poster fails WP:NFCC#9 for use in the user page. Aspects (talk) 02:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CBBCLogo2007.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to {{PD-USonly}}. — ξ ^xplicit 03:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logo being used in a gallery of former logos in CBBC#Logos and also within the same article in CBBC#History. File has a non-free use rationale for one of the uses, but the rationale erroneously states the image is being used in the infobox at the top of the article to identify the station. In addition, there is only a single rationale provided so WP:NFCC#10c is not met. The usage in the logo gallery is clearly decoarative which is not something allowed per WP:NFCC#8 (WP:NFG). The usage in the "History" section also seems decorative since the context required by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking since the logo itself is not the subject of any sourced discussion within the section. I believe this image is too complicated to be below the threshold of originality for the UK to be considered {{PD-logo}}, but perhaps {{PD-USonly}} is a possibility. If the logo is too complicated for even "PD-USonly", then the multiple uses in the article clearly fail to comply with WP:NFCC#3a and I suggest remove from the gallery regardless since there does not seem to be any way to write a valid non-free use rationale for such usage. I also suggest remove from the "History" section unless the NFCC#8 concerns are properly addressed and the non-free use rationale is updated to reflect such usage. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mitr-red.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 (talk) 11:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The screenshot fails WP:NFCC#8 in use in the actor's biographical article. There is already a screenshot used in the infobox for the dead actor where his face is not covered up by a mask. The one sentence about the character has no commentary about the screenshot thereby doing nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the topic and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the topic. The screenshot fails WP:NFCC#9 for use in the user page. Aspects (talk) 02:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:University of Missouri seal bw.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:University of Missouri Seal.svg, and current usage fails WP:NFC#UUI §17 and WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 (talk) 11:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care what version is used, but all universities in the University of Missouri system use this seal. It's the seal for each university. So it does not violate §17. That is why it is included in each of the articles. I recommend using the black and gold seal in all articles the b/w is used in, except the sandbox. 🍀 Corkythehornetfan 🍀 16:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit body Al-Raed 0910 A.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused football kit image. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No foreseeable use. Reh man 13:18, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Packet.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and no description on what the image is trying to portray. Reh man 13:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Will1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unidentified person. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom. Reh man 13:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit left arm Al-Raed 0910 A.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused football kit image. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No foreseeable use. Reh man 13:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Occupational Structure of Manfield in 1831.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

c:File:Occupational Structure of Manfield in 1831.png is better as the words 'chart area' do not appear on that copy. Stefan2 (talk) 13:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The 'chart area' file might be a mistaken upload. Reh man 13:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit right arm redblue stripes.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused football kit image. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom. Reh man 13:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Profile Picture.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MER-C (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused userphoto. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No longer used. Reh man 13:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clipboard.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low resolution. Stefan2 (talk) 13:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. Move to Commons? Reh man 13:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete From the Fermilab site -- not all national laboratories have PD works. Apparently Fermilab has nonexistent copyright policy. See Template_talk:PD-USGov-DOE. Also I'm skeptical that a DOE lab would have created an image like this (may have pulled it from non-PD clipart for example). Delete as likely copyright violation. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 03:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unknown what it's meant to show. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to the uploader's edit history it's a list of "Irevna Delivery Centres and Sales Offices".Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Rename and keep if it fits in the Irevna article. Reh man 13:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TPC.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The text on the file information page suggests that it might not be own work by the uploader. Additionally, the file is unused without foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the licensing is unverifiable. I support a deletion also because of the usefulness concerns.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No foreseeable use. Reh man 13:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tcs.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No existing article or foreseeable use. Reh man 13:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SmallLogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo of unclear notability. No foreseeable use. Also, if it really is a logo, then the authorship claim is questionable. Stefan2 (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Landscape Arch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality. c:File:Landscape Arch.jpg is much better and doesn't contain the photographer's finger. Stefan2 (talk) 14:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slide0001 image002.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's also not clear at all what the file is about.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TV-icon.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Twin Lakes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 15:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Projects.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, possibly unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit body alb10a.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused football kit image. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 16:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shannon Flynn.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted by BethNaught - ((F5: Unused non-free media file for more than 7 days) –Davey2010^Talk 19:30, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image was on the Shannon Flynn article instead of the character she's portraying and although it could be added to the List of Dani's Castle characters it would be stupid to only include one image to the article and plus there's No infoboxes on the list article anyway, Personally I think the image's better off deleted, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 18:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LuisPares.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent copyright violation -- see https://www.flickr.com/photos/ateneubarcelones/9458032935/in/album-72157634969094979/ Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TWPHW61.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 19:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wiring.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 19:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thinking.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit body redbluequarters.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Price.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep Grumpy2006's upload. — ξ ^xplicit 03:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overwritten file: three in one.

File uploaded by Grumpy2006 (talk · contribs) and Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs): Appears to be licensed, but is unused and without foreseeable use. Delete this file.
File uploaded by Slaval (talk · contribs), Nikthestunned (talk · contribs), McGeddon (talk · contribs) and Godzilladude123 (talk · contribs): Unlicensed, unsourced and out of scope. Delete this file.
File uploaded by Godzilladude123 (talk · contribs): Sourced to a website. Copyright violation, so delete the file. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the file uploaded by Grumpy2006, it is Dave Price (publisher) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:41, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skin1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit right arm Al-Raed 0910 A.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ladytechsterslogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Cryptic (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PD logo; File:LA Tech Lady Techsters logo.png has replaced this file on Commons. 🍀 Corkythehornetfan 🍀 22:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tribe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unidentified subject. Stefan2 (talk) 22:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently a photo of the Tribe Fastball Club, but we'd need an admin to confirm.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Since the article has been deleted, I assume that pictures of the club are out of scope for Wikipedia. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pills.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Glanmire Kitty.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not used anywhere. Personal picture with no value. Kafka Liz (talk) 23:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Hi Kafka Liz. The file is now being used on your user page and in one of your user talk archives. Does this mean you now want to save the file? -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Marchjuly, and thanks for pinging me. Yes, I would like to withdraw the nomination for deletion. Thanks again, Kafka Liz (talk) 21:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - In use and of major historical (to me) interest. Ceoil (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.