Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 March 10

< March 9	March 11 >

March 10

File:Debashree Roy in Justice Choudhury (1983).jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a screenshot from a 1983 Indian film. The uploader is asserting to the copyright holder, but editting a screenshot from a copyrighted movie does not make one the copyright holder. Whpq (talk) 00:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Debashree Roy in Prohor (2004).jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a screenshot from a copyrighted film. The uploader is asserting to the copyright holder, but editting a screenshot from a copyrighted movie does not make one the copyright holder. Whpq (talk) 00:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Debashree Roy in Phulwari (1984).jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a screenshot from a copyrighted film. The uploader is asserting to the copyright holder, but editting a screenshot from a copyrighted movie does not make one the copyright holder. Whpq (talk) 00:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Australian Celebrity Survivor Cast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free cast photo that for use in Celebrity Survivor, but the role of primary image in this article is taken by the infobox image of the program's logo. The cast photo is simply being used to illustrate the cast of the particular season, and appears to only be a partial cast photo with some cast members being omitted for no significant reason. Rationale exists for use in only one article but is currently used in two articles. The image depicts living people playing themselves in the program, and thus is replaceable with free images, for similar reasons to recently deleted Real Housewives cast photos at an earlier Files for discussion. -- Whats new?^(talk) 07:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Comintelli logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Consolidated Aircraft Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 April 30. czar 03:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Consolidated Aircraft Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Confederate Lot on the NRHP.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 April 30. czar 03:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Confederate Lot on the NRHP.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:COB CELEBRATE Sculpture, Oct. 2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

derivative of non-free content (statue); there is no FOP for 3D works in the USA FASTILY 08:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Colarmyflag.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, superior version available: File:National Army of Colombia flag.svg FASTILY 08:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CNRS logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

low res, unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Collectrium logo 300px.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Collin H Haughton ceo nocainc.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Sphilbrick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cold process Aleppo Soap.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

possible derivative of non-free content (logo) FASTILY 08:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think the bigger concern is that the image looks professional and that there isn't EXIF data or confirmation from the author on its origins. But the graphics appear over the threshold of originality too czar 05:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coat of Arms of Pentortoise.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, dubious licensing FASTILY 08:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Codevalley-logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. czar 05:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cocovoicelogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Comintelli logotype.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coat of Arms of Springs.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Files uploaded by Niloydas6801

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted -FASTILY 02:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has a history of copyright violations. The latest set of uploads all make the claim that the source was "Walking through Newtown" however other images marked as such were clear copyright violations including File:NARKELBAGANMORE.jpg where a watermark identifying the photographer was removed. This deliberate lying about the sources makes any claim of images being own work as dubious, doubly so when some images are sized at lower resoltutions indicating they were likely taken from a web site. Whpq (talk) 15:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Georgia Historical Society logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

incorrect logo Brendanghs (talk) 16:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Georgia Historical Society logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is an incorrect version of the Georgia Historical Society's logo. Note the A in Historical being taller than the first A. This is an incorrect recreation of the official logo. Brendanghs (talk) 16:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Milica Fajgelj.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to the comments for this photo, the "photo was taken in Belgrade, during a freelance photoshoot by a friend" which would mean the friend is the copyright holder, and not the uploader as asserted. We would need OTRS confirmation for the licensing on this image. Whpq (talk) 17:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charles Sobhraj in 1995.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image is from the Hindustan Times. Their archives of text and images can be purchased as a feed or individual items can be purchased. Fails to satisfy WP:NFCC#2. Whpq (talk) 18:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Due to shortage of time, I would argue that the image does not violate commercial interests of Hindustan Times because the image can be found in other sources as well, such as youtube videos for non commercial purposes. Even if this were not the case, I petition that the image does not go against the commercial interest because the image can be found in other sources, which I will be willing to provide at a later time if need be. Hopefully I can be given time to resolve this dispute peacefully. Thank you in response. TTTAssasinator (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those other uses of the image may be:

A copyright violation. That others infringe on Hindustan Times' commercial interests does not mean we should
A licensed use of the image. That would mean that they have purchased a license to use the image from Hindustan Times. That would reinforce that this use on Wikipedia does not respect the commercial opportunity of the Hindustan Times with respect to this image.
A legal fair use of the image. But Wikipedia's non-free content policy is much stricter than fair use, so examples of such aren't really relevant.

As such, the use of the same image elsewhere on the web does not mean that WP:NFCC#2 has been met. -- Whpq (talk) 22:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If such, I'll concede as I am unable to argue against your third point. Thank you for the respectful reaponse, I must admit. TTTAssasinator — Preceding unsigned comment added by TTTAssasinator (talk • contribs) 22:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alaska-district-judges.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. I can restore the file whenever the source is verified—just link this discussion and let me know. czar 03:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged with {{di-no source}} on February 11. Since there are derivative files on Commons and related files both here and on Commons that would be affected by any action on this file, I feel it should be discussed. I'm not holding out much hope, though. From what I've seen, FFD is not so much about genuine concern over copyright issues as it is another venue to further purge the encyclopedia of organic matter, leading towards making it a lazy repeat of some other place on the web (read: "missing clear and verifiable source information" = "no URL means no WP:V as far as we're concerned"). This is amplified by the fact that certain editors have strived to make our coverage of United States federal courts nothing more than a carbon copy of their own website. The revision history and my past experiences with WP:MCQ shows a pattern of anti-AGF behavior causing me to question whether you really want free content. Anyway, the catalog of the library I obtained this from shows that they still have a copy, so I will try to make an effort to provide whatever information you appear to be requesting (kinda hard for me to tell exactly from the robo-message). RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 05:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since it is from a printed medium, ideally a 'full citation'. Thanks for checking. -FASTILY 08:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: @RadioKAOS:, I guess that http://www.worldcat.org/title/united-states-district-court-for-the-district-of-alaska-our-first-fifty-years/oclc/570203049 is the source work? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 18:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @RadioKAOS, for page citation, if scanned from book czar 18:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@RadioKAOS, last ping czar 05:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.