Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 May 3
May 3
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The email allegedly provided by the artist states As the copyright holder of the 2002 Childers Memorial Portrait entitled 'Taking a Break in the Field' I am happy to authorize the use of an image of this painting in conjunction with your Wikipedia text entry., however the uploader has marked it as their own work, being in the public domain or being suitable for any use anywhere in the world. The actual copyright holder has authorised it for use in this one Wikipedia article -- most definitely not released it into the public domain. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 01:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I remember this from before, the photographer gave permission, but not the original artist who painted the picture. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:39, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- From the image description, it looks like the scanner (who is the uploader, Duncan), the photographer (Mary Lewis), and the original artist (Josonia Palaitis) have given permission. The problem is that the original artist Josonia Palaitis, who is the copyright holder, gave only the following permission "...authorize the use of an image of this painting in conjunction with your Wikipedia text entry." Unfortunately that permission is inadequate for use on WP. WP requires that the copyright holder be willing to to license an image under terms that allow anyone the rights of modification, redistribution, and use for any purpose, including commercial purposes. It looks like there was discussion on PUI before about this same (or possibly just similar) image. From the prior discussions and the comments on the uploader's page it looks like the uploader was told about how to go about getting the permissions WP requires (WP:PERMISSION has the details). —RP88 13:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So as it is now then, it's not public domain, right? Is there a licence that applies to it in its current state, or does the uploader need to seek more open permission? Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 21:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No, as it stands now it is not public domain. In its current state the correct license tag is {{Non-free with permission}}. However, for the content to remain on WP, that particular license tag requires that the image also be tagged with one of the fair-use image tags. —RP88 23:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The uploader needs to do one of two things:
- ... ask the copyright holder to allow us to use it under a free license (see WP:PERMISSION). If permission is granted under a license that WP considers to be a "free license", the page should then be updated tp accurately describe the source, copyright holder, and license.
- or, alternatively, tag it as {{Non-free with permission}}, one of the other fair-use image tags, and supply a reasonable fair use rationale for why this image is fair use for Childers Palace Backpackers Hostel fire. I don't think this second option is practical, as I can't see any way for the article in question to be reasonably considered to be critical commentary on this painting.
- —RP88 00:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So as it is now then, it's not public domain, right? Is there a licence that applies to it in its current state, or does the uploader need to seek more open permission? Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 21:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TexasStateNursing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image appears to belong to Texas State University and is displayed on their website (http://www.health.txstate.edu/nursing/Construction.html, second row, first image) whereas the uploader claims it is entirely their work. --TreyGeek (talk) 02:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G10 by JoJan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Baroid.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The odds that the uploader owns the copyright to an image of a MLB player inside a dugout are vanishingly small. Uploader has a history of modifying copyrighted images and attempting to claim a new copyright. Resolute 04:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This looks like a screenshot from elsewhere... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:45, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jollibee SMB2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Visible logos - FoP applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Waltermart april.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logos - FoP applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wikipedia searchbox.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Google Logo inclusion Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Anissa Jones.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- From the quality of the image I am wondering if this a screencap rather than self as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Canonwarnerwindow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- According to the article the stained glass was comissioned as a memorial to a death in 1947, Even if the artist died the same year, the copyright for an artwork comissioned in 1947 might not yet have epxired. Is FoP applicable to stained glass windows? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think Freedom of Panorama does indeed apply in this case under UK copyright laws (see Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_Kingdom for some details). In the UK a stained glass window is certainly a "work of artistic craftsmanship," as stained glass is specifically called out as so in Hensher -v- Restawhile. I think we can definitely say it is "permanently situated." The only question is if it is located in premises open to the public. This is a little less certain, but I think an Anglican church (in this case Holy Trinity Eastbourne) can be considered to be "open to the public" (their web site says "Holiday makers and other visitors are always welcome"). —RP88 15:23, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I think this should be kept for two reasons (either of which would be sufficient in my mind). First, I think RP88 is correct that freedom of panorama does apply. It is permanently situated in premises that are open to the public. Secondly, as the Church of England is headed by the British Monarch, I think it would be fair to say that expired Crown Copyright also applies. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think expiration of Crown Copyright is applicable. Even in cases where the Crown directly commissions works of art, the artist still retains his or her copyright (in the absence of any evidence of a copyright assignment or work for hire agreement). —RP88 23:29, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Game screenshot? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This is an in game screen shot of a game developed by Nigredo Studios, and is lead by my self (Adam McKern) - we release this screen shot to the 'public domain'. --Amckern (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Subject to an appropriate email being sent to the OTRS permissions queue - this can be closed rapidly :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- What is the email address please? --Amckern (talk) 01:31, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Subject to an appropriate email being sent to the OTRS permissions queue - this can be closed rapidly :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This is an in game screen shot of a game developed by Nigredo Studios, and is lead by my self (Adam McKern) - we release this screen shot to the 'public domain'. --Amckern (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AYLESBURY.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Biggleswade united.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Broxbourne fc.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:COLNEY.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HANWELL.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HARES.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Haringey better.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dtfc-badge.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DTFClion.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AFC-Badge-3.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WGC Club LogoCR.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TRING.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ST MAG.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:03, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Oxhey jts badge.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Leverstock.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Georgestit large.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Added info in good faith - Given users talk page not so sure it's self. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:09, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:LANDFORD.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:09, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kl tigers.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kentish-Town-FC-badge.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:11, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hillingdon.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ikar123.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Web resolution - Self claim but no other information - AGF? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- An identical image is available online at this web page, which predates upload to WP. There is no indication that this earlier source is associated with the uploader. —RP88 22:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ThisPrvdnce2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Reffering given uploaders history - see thier talk page for example Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Malaysiamontage.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No information as to status of images used in montage Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SafeeSali.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See watermark in image - No indication uploader is connected with that organisation Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.