Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 December 23
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
December 23
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ambassador Akbar Ahmed.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a screen capture; very low resolution and quality make it unlikely this was a user created free image. Nableezy 01:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wicked Lady Pub.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See the discussion for this image on commons; this image is not eligible for non-free content based on how it's currently being used. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:23, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Walesvsbush2.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative Work. Photo of George W. Bush appears to have come from a press kit. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:00, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:APCLogoColor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unused banner with trademarks. Uploader claims a "self" license but doubtful. All their other uploads have been from other sources and most of them deleted Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Blatant copyvio. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:APM-Image-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:APM-Image-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)
- File:APM-Image-3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)
- File:APM-Image-4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)
- Series of images all uploaded as "self" but credited to "APM Terminals' photography." Seemingly obtained from the APM Website. The media gallery is for registered users but the disclaimer states Authorized users can download images and purchase prints for company or personal use. All images and graphics © 2010 APM Terminals. - in which case these could be speedied as copyvios. (EDIT: I just saw a note from March of 2008 about these images on the articles talk page. The editor said, in part, However, all three images are exactly the same as the ones on the company website here. This strongly suggests the images are wrongly tagged and a breach of copyright. I have no idea why these weren't tagged/deleted two year ago) Soundvisions1 (talk) 05:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Alphard 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- 28 Tineye hits, a few that clearly outdate the upload date to Wikipedia, indicate to me that this is likely not the work of the uploader. Also, the image is unused and has no description text. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:45, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BLUDFED.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly a promotional image for a band, unlikely that it is owned by the uploader, and unused outside of a sandbox article that hasn't been updated since 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BLUDICON.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Based on the name, the logo for a band, unlikely that it is owned by the uploader, and unused outside of a sandbox article that hasn't been updated since 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hayley Moorwood.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Probably not the work of the uploader - uploader says he is a professional photographer but has managed to upload copyrighted images taken by others MilborneOne (talk) 13:45, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hannah Wall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Probably not the work of the uploader - uploader says he is a professional photographer but has managed to upload copyrighted images taken by others MilborneOne (talk) 13:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rosie White.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Probably not the work of the uploader - uploader says he is a professional photographer but has managed to upload copyrighted images taken by others MilborneOne (talk) 13:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted. RL0919 (talk) 14:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ian Hogg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Probably not the work of the uploader - uploader says he is a professional photographer but has managed to upload copyrighted images taken by others MilborneOne (talk) 13:49, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Image source is http://www.aucklandcityfc.com/assets/uploads/galleries/large-original-54828.jpg where the copyright Phototek in the corner has been cropped out, has been nominated for speedy F9. MilborneOne (talk) 10:42, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted. RL0919 (talk) 14:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Luiz del Monte.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Probably not the work of the uploader - uploader says he is a professional photographer but has managed to upload copyrighted images taken by others MilborneOne (talk) 13:51, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- copyright violation from Getty images http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/90975343/Getty-Images-Sport tagged for CSD-F9 MilborneOne (talk) 10:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Maia Jackman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Probably not the work of the uploader - uploader says he is a professional photographer but has managed to upload copyrighted images taken by others MilborneOne (talk) 13:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Source appears to be http://www.times.co.nz/cms/sport/sports_news/2010/02/four_ferns_for_fencibles.php MilborneOne (talk) 10:46, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Abby Erceg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Probably not the work of the uploader - uploader says he is a professional photographer but has managed to upload copyrighted images taken by others MilborneOne (talk) 13:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Source appears to be http://www.times.co.nz/cms/sport/sports_news/2010/02/four_ferns_for_fencibles.php MilborneOne (talk) 10:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Aztec.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The original uploader gave the image a non-free tag[1]. It was a different user that later came along and assigned the free license to the photo.[2] Kelly hi! 16:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep, licensed as {{PD-text}}. — ξxplicit 00:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AB Logo 300.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is probably not the work of the uploader - the uploader's username is similar to that of the copyright holder but this could possibly not be the copyright holder.--Aamsse (talk) 18:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.