Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 August 10
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
August 10
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Unclear if the uploader is the copyright holder. Kelly hi! 04:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep.-FASTILY (TALK) 00:10, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eden II.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This picture of a statue is tagged as being own work. However, the United States does not have freedom of panorama that applies to art. (FOP in the US only applies to buildings) Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:01, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: it's a ship and "a guard house constructed with plywood and galvanized steel, containing LCD monitors, security cameras, a media player, and an audio amplifier", according to the article. Except for the guard house and the ship, nothing is visible, and both ships and guard houses are simple functional objects: copyright law does not prohibit me from taking photos at Lowe's or a dockyard, and this is not substantially different. Nyttend (talk) 00:51, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Function is also important. As stated in the lead of the article, it is a "public artwork"; a ship in a random dock would not function as artwork. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's still a ship; if I put two manufactured objects in front of my house and call them art, I can't use copyright law to prevent people from taking and publishing pictures of them. Nyttend (talk) 22:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Julfa 04.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Julfa 05.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:50, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Julfa 06.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Julfa 05.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:50, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Julfa 07.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Julfa 08.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Julfa 09.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Julfa 08.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kharian cantt green.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Small, web-resoultion image. Uploader has a history of both text and image copyvios, so I'm inclined to think that this is another. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:40, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cantt station.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Small, web-resoultion image. Uploader has a history of both text and image copyvios, so I'm inclined to think that this is another. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:40, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kharian cantt1.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Did the uploader really create both the included maps? Uploader has a history of both text and image copyvios, so I'm inclined to think that this is another. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:41, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kharian cantt road.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphaned, small, web-resolution image. Uploader has a history of both text and image copyvios, so I'm inclined to think that this is another. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:41, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Main cantt.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader has a history of both text and image copyvios, so I'm inclined to think that this is another. Of all his uploads, however, I'd say this one is most likely to be legit (due to the image's larger size), but I still think it is better to be safe than sorry. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:43, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hassan satpara shop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Small, web-resolution image. Uploader has a history of both text and image copyvios, so I'm inclined to think that this is another. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:43, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:With presedent.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Small, web-resolution image. Uploader has a history of both text and image copyvios, so I'm inclined to think that this is another. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:43, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hassan satpara.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Small, web-resolution image. Uploader has a history of both text and image copyvios, so I'm inclined to think that this is another. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:43, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:On top of G1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Small, web-resolution image. Uploader has a history of both text and image copyvios, so I'm inclined to think that this is another. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; delete original rev.-FASTILY (TALK) 00:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Proxyblock.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The component images include File:Exquisite-kwrite.png (GPL) and File:Schematic Proxy Server.png (GFDL, CC-BY-SA). AFAIK, these licenses are incompatible, with all of them requiring that derivative works be released under the same license. However, the derivate can't be licensed under any of them because of the other images having a different license. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:49, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The derivative work—my creation—is released under the same licenses, and because of their versions, they're compatible with the entire Wikipedia relicensing. That is, I explicitly dual-licensed my creation, because it was around the same time that the dual-license referendum at meta was occurring. Because one is GFDL <= 1.3, it, like the other contributions to wikipedia, are compatible with relicensing to CC-BY-SA 3.0 as far as I know. That's the reason why we were able to switch to dual licensing. Please see Wikipedia:Multi-licensing and Wikipedia:Licensing update. --slakr\ talk / 09:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- ...and if I'm not mistaken, they all meet Wikipedia:Image_license_migration#Media_file_relicensing_criteria, but if I'm totally wrong, feel free to let me know. --slakr\ talk / 09:46, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The GPL is not eligible for relicensing, if I remember correctly. only the GFDL. I know their names are similar, but they're quite different. Since the GPL can't be relicensed, the derivative work cannot be Cc-by-sa, and must by GPL. However, it cannot be GPL because the other image is GFDL (and vice versa). Technicality, I know, and I'm not 100% certain; another pair of eyes would be nice. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:50, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well I guess I'll take your word for it. I thought that since I'm clearly the derived-work copyright holder that if someone wanted to take issue with it, they'd have to deal with me, personally. If you get a chance, please make a replacement for it so that User:ProcseeBot has an easy way of showing confused users why they're blocked, because you're far more well-versed than me in the nuances of derived works with copyleft licensing. With a full-time job, I have no time otherwise. Thanks. --slakr\ talk / 23:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The GPL is not eligible for relicensing, if I remember correctly. only the GFDL. I know their names are similar, but they're quite different. Since the GPL can't be relicensed, the derivative work cannot be Cc-by-sa, and must by GPL. However, it cannot be GPL because the other image is GFDL (and vice versa). Technicality, I know, and I'm not 100% certain; another pair of eyes would be nice. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:50, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- ...and if I'm not mistaken, they all meet Wikipedia:Image_license_migration#Media_file_relicensing_criteria, but if I'm totally wrong, feel free to let me know. --slakr\ talk / 09:46, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The derivative work—my creation—is released under the same licenses, and because of their versions, they're compatible with the entire Wikipedia relicensing. That is, I explicitly dual-licensed my creation, because it was around the same time that the dual-license referendum at meta was occurring. Because one is GFDL <= 1.3, it, like the other contributions to wikipedia, are compatible with relicensing to CC-BY-SA 3.0 as far as I know. That's the reason why we were able to switch to dual licensing. Please see Wikipedia:Multi-licensing and Wikipedia:Licensing update. --slakr\ talk / 09:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete because of simple conflicted license. So much for the claim that copyleft free licenses are so much better than non-copyleft free licenses. Nyttend (talk) 00:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- PUF no longer needed I replaced writing icon with File:Notepad icon.svg, which is licensed as Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported. Now there is no license conflict. We can just revdel the old version and carry on. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete only original revision, keep current revision, per Sven's changes (Thanks!). I've updated the licensing to be only CC-BY-SA-3.0, because File:Notepad_icon.svg is not GFDL. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:33, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GrudemWA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- no evidence that source website released this or other images on it under public domain Warfieldian (talk) 15:56, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WFQuinn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder. Kelly hi! 18:15, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hoff.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 18:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cwr referendum2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- A personal photo of a poster is not substantively different from scanning the poster. Unlikely uploader holds the rights to the poster. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:29, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cwr referendum1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- As above. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:29, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cwr referendum3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- As above. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:30, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kenshi characterselect.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Looks like a screen capture and not the property of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 21:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Quie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 23:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.