Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 15

September 15

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 15, 2020.

Beijing bikini

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beijing bikini → Chinese culture (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Procedural nomination on behalf of Lovewhatyoudo (talk · contribs); an AFD was opened containing the rationale Beijing bikini is summer street attire among some older Beijing men. Hardly "Chinese culture". "Beijing bikini" is not mentioned in the target article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:20, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Misleading since this is not mentioned at the target. Also this should be redlinked to encourage the creation of a possible article as per Lovewhatyoudo's rationale at AfD. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tphoon Mujigae (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tphoon Mujigae (disambiguation) → List of storms named Mujigae (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Implausible misspelling. We do not have the redirect "Tphoon", so this is only mention of "tphoon" in enwiki. However, "tphoon" could also be a mispelling of teaspoon. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 22:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per K4. Unambiguous and harmless. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 22:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seventyfiveyears, what could "Teaspoon Mujigae" refer to? -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, likely created in error. I fail to see how this could be a misspelling for teaspoon though. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (disambiguation) redirects aren't really meant to be search terms, so this is kinda useless and implausible. The page was at the title for less than 24 hours, so old links shouldn't be a real issue. Hog Farm _Bacon 02:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Target of the redirect is not a disambiguation page but a set index list article. This redirect may be unambiguous, but it is also incorrect. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- JHunterJ, I wanted to let you know that I restored your improper WP:G14 of Typhoon Mujigae (disambiguation). G14 does not apply to pages that perform a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists). Also, the page was at this title for several years, so the redirect is a useful {{R from move}}. -- Tavix ^(talk) 11:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have responded at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#"or pages that perform a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists).". -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:14, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per J947 and Tavix. This is useful and harmless. Thryduulf (talk) 15:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Typhoon Mujigae (disambiguation) already exists and is useful. The redirect that's discussed here, on the other hand, contains a rare typo – it's the only such item on Wikipedia and so will interfere with searches whenever readers make this typo while searching in a different context. There's no need to preserve it for historic purposes: it is an artefact of an error when creating the article, and it was corrected less than a day after it was made, back in 2016. – Uanfala (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete noting the correctly spelt Typhoon Mujigae (disambiguation) exists, even though that's not required either. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Typo. SMB9 9thx my edits 12:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Utica Bulldogs/Blizzard

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Utica Bulldogs/Blizzard → Utica Blizzard (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete per WP:XY. No sources directly link these two teams, and actually seems to be separate entities. It seems Utica Bulldogs was mistakenly redirected to Blizzard in 2008. I have since merged the Bulldogs content into the Flint Bulldogs and corrected the redirect, but this odd redirect is XY. Yosemiter (talk) 21:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

That Man

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 23#That Man

Philidelphians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Philadelphians. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Philidelphians → Major League Cricket#Minor League Cricket (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Misspelled, but more importantly is as likely to refer to people from Philadelphia as it is to this minor league team. I'd suggest deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How about moving it to Philadelphians (team)? GreekApple123 (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Moving redirects is generally advised against; you can just create Philadelphians (team) rather than making complex page histories. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 20:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Philadelphians as it's more of a plausible misspelling of that term. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 22:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Philadelphians as a {{R from misspelling}} per Seventyfiveyears. Thryduulf (talk) 02:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above proposal sounds good to me. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Babur Lateef

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 23#Babur Lateef

Non-avian

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-avian → Theropod (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete. "Non-avian" is just a term that means "not bird". It is only ever used when paired with a term like "dinosaur", to make, for example, "non-avian dinosaur", i.e. any dinosaur that is not a bird. This article was created to redirect to the Theropoda article, but there is no logic to this connection; Theropoda is just a group of dinosaurs that includes birds and most predatory dinosaurs. This article has no reasonable other place to redirect to, and should be deleted as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Zigongosaurus1138 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Ambiguous and may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Serbo-Croatia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, with no prejudice against turning it into its own disambiguation page. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Serbo-Croatia → Serbo-Croatian (disambiguation) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Implausible misspelling. Could also mean Yugoslavia. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 12:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is the exact opposite of an implausible misspelling. If further disambiguation is needed, then do that. Need for more disambig templates is not a deletion rationale. This has been extensively discussed before; see Talk:Serbo-Croatia. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 14:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems quite helpful, like SMcCandlish says at Talk:Serbo-Croatia it seems very plausible that someone who sees Serbo-Croatian might assume that a region named "Serbo-Croatia" existed. Any reason this would be referring to Yugoslavia? – Thjarkur (talk) 19:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SMcC's comments at Talk:Serbo-Croatia. This definitely isn't an implausible misspelling. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 20:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. It's a plausible misspelling, so where is the proof of deleting this redirect? Seventyfiveyears (talk) 22:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- ...it isn't a misspelling though... — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 22:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do not keep. There are plenty of uses of the term out there in the wild [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. Some may be erroneous, but many aren't. The intended meaning is Serbia + Croatia, in either mediaeval or modern contexts, either as political or as geographic or cultural region. I would imagine this should be covered somewhere, but I can't find a suitable article (though I haven't searched thoroughly). If nothing comes up, then deletion per XY or redirecting to ~~Serbo-Croatian (disambiguation)~~ are viable options. – Uanfala (talk) 00:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- or redirecting to Serbo-Croatian (disambiguation): that's where the redirect is targeted right now. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 01:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you for correcting my silly mistake. Yes, I probably shouldn't do Wikipedia so late at night again :) Though I don't think keeping the current target is the best option: at the very least, this dab page lists only a single viable entry, the rest are all clear WP:PTMs, so it probably shouldn't exist. – Uanfala (talk) 09:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per J947 and SMcCandlish. This looks like another failure to do a proper WP:BEFORE. Thryduulf (talk) 02:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per everyone above and per the discussion at Talk:Serbo-Croatia. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:12, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hummer H0

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hummer H0 → Humvee (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Neither the target article nor Hummer has the text "H0" so this redirect should be deleted as confusing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

H0rrid

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

H0rrid → David Hewlett (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

It is not clear why this redirects here: the target article does not contain "horrid", with the letter O, or "h0rrid", with a zero, or any expression beginning "h0...". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteThe history of this redirect references a previous one created by LogicSequence. Comments at user talk:LogicSequence note that they provided evidence to Dina that this was a nickname used by the subject, which can be found at user talk:Dina#User:Logicsequence. This notes the subject's official youtube page is at http://www.youtube.com/h0rrid but at some point in the past 13 years that has now changed and the url presently redirects to https://www.youtube.com/c/dHewlett, suggesting he has moved away from using this nickname. The mention on A Dog's Breakfast referred to was an external link removed in this edit. As there is no present mention of the name on Wikipedia, and with no evidence I could quickly find that they are currently using the nickname a mention would not likely be DUE, I am left recommending deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 12:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shani Haider

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shani Haider → Shani Arshad (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Shani Haider and Shani Arshad are different singers, and it's not clear why one's name should point to the other. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 04:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article seems to have been originally about Haider [9] – Thjarkur (talk) 19:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but it isn't at the moment. It is confusing, though, that someone would move the article to the other singer's name and rewrite it to be about him. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 20:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.